Jump to content

User talk:Jarekt

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository

Tech News: 2025-19

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 00:11, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Igenc Tech News

[edit]

Hi Jarekt,
I've finally solved the issue mentioned here (at 'This coat of arms was created with Inkscape…important by xxx'), the “important” option creates a link that leads to a section of the manual with the aim of informing the user that his file is not optimized; the option is generated by the code “im”, its counterpart is the code “iz”, that informs the user that the file is indeed optimized, it's still visible on this file, just click on “optimized” to get to the help in question. It's likely that this attention wasn't correctly perceived by users, as the link wasn't visible, and I think I'll deprecate it when I get to the related extension ; also, the code “iz” is defined elsewhere than in Module:IgenCoa, probably at the top level, i.e. Template:Image_generation that the module depends on.
Which brings to the next point: Managing users in IgenCoa does indeed make it hard to maintain - I'm gradually reducing the number of ids, per each user's files managed in, also the categorization can also be done directly in the file by adjusting the options ; the advantage of user-categorization by igen code (directly in the file page) is to avoid categorization in a user's category of another user's files, when categories entered normally are copy-pasted from one file to another without verification, which happens frequently…
The next point, then, is that IgenCoa is just a part of Template:Image_generation, which doesn't only define CoAs but also logos, diagrams, flags, icons, seals, emblems, symbols, which is great, but the main issue is that it also defines tools and there are too many of them, some of which are barely used, example: this category handles many subcategories for a too-limited amount of files, then it might be relevant to merge the categorization of barely used tools (other than Adobe, inkscape, Corel, Txt, etc.) with Other tools, while retaining the icon on the file description
I'm not there yet. BR,--Kontributor 2K (talk) 10:23, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kontributor 2K, Thank you for the update. I am also still confused by "important" option. I read Help:Inkscape and {{Image generation}} and still message "This vector image was created with Inkscape…important by v" visible in File:Cilician Armenia-en.svg makes no sense and the link does not help. Does it just mean that it is stored as Inkscape SVG not plain SVG? Or if it means it is not optimized than maybe the message should be "This unoptimized vector image was created with Inkscape by v". The message " This PNG …important was created with Inkscape…important." visible in File:Tropfsteine-hell edited with tags.png also makes no sense in English. --Jarekt (talk) 02:26, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for this update too,
"This vector image was created with Inkscape…important by" does just look to mean, according to "Handling Inkscape SVG" section on the target page, that it's "stored in Inkscape SVG" rather than plain/optimized, and tagged as such by a user; that said it's unlikely that users would handle this paremeter correctly, or even simply use it, so this option seems above all to add some complexity, globally.
I think too that the message could indeed be "This unoptimized vector file…", rather than "…important".
The message on the .png file indeed makes no sense, of course there's no reason for Im to be used on raster files, other than a careless code copy-paste, For now I've removed the im/iz parameters from the user table in Igencoa/sb. --Kontributor 2K (talk) 17:13, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2025-20

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 22:34, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2025-21

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:09, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2025-22

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 20:01, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Koszyszcze cmentarz Legionów Polskich.jpg

[edit]
Witam. Czy byłbyś uprzejmy sprawdzić, czy usunięcie w/w pliku przez @Stifle było właściwe?
Pozdrawiam.

Grzes1966 (talk) 09:41, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Grzes1966, usunięcie pliku File:Koszyszcze cmentarz Legionów Polskich.jpg, nie jest niewłaściwe. Szablon {{PD-Poland}} powinien być używany jedynie jeśli jest to skan z polskiej publikacji wydanej przed 1994 rokiem. Twoja fotografia nie spełnia tego wymogu. Nie sądzę że Stifle wziął to pod uwagę, ale decyzje na podstawie tego pliku i tej licencji nie jest niewłaściwa. W przypadku tej i podobnych fotografii, szablon {{PD-anon-70-EU}}, dla fotografii anonimowych fotografów których prawa autorskie wygasają "70 lat od czasu kiedy praca została udostępniona dla publiczności", może być lepszy. Co prawda nie znamy dokładnej daty kiedy ta fotografia była "udostępniona dla publiczności", ale fakt ze jest to fotografia z 1933 roku dostępna dla publiczności a polskim archiwum, może znaczyć że przypuszczalnie trafiła do tego archiwum przed 1955 roku (70 lat temu). Tak przy okazji, jak przesyłasz podpisy to używaj {{PD-signature}}. Jeśli masz w przyszłości pytania na temat Commons czy licencji to chętnie pomogę. Pozdrowienia --Jarekt (talk) 13:52, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Jarekt Dziękuję za odpowiedź.
Czy można przywrócić usunięty plik, czy też musiałbym go pnownie przesłać?
Grzes1966 (talk) 14:00, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Grzes1966, Jakby to było na 100% w domenie publicznej to bym przywrócił, ale nie jest to wolę się do tego nie dotykać. --Jarekt (talk) 11:54, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Jarekt Ok. Grzes1966 (talk) 12:46, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]