User talk:Ruthven

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


This is a Wikimedia Commons user talk page.

This is not an article, file or the talk page of an article or file. If you find this page on any site other than the Wikimedia Commons you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this talk page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than the Wikimedia Commons itself. The original page is located at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Ruthven.

This is the user talk page of Ruthven, where you can send messages and comments to Ruthven.

  • Be polite.
  • Be friendly.
  • Assume good faith.
  • No personal attacks.
  • Please sign and date your entries by clicking on the appropriate button or by typing four tildes (~~~~) at the end.
  • Put new text under old text.
  • New to Wikimedia Commons? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers as soon as possible.
  • Click here to start a new topic.


2005 - 2011
2012 - 2016
2017 (Gen - May)
2017 (Jun - Dec)
2018 (Jan - Jun)
2018 - 2019 (Jul - Apr)
2019 (May - Dec)
2020 - 2021
2022 -

Violazione copyright[edit]

Ciao, ho visto una segnalazione su Wikisource di violazione di copyright. In effetti l'autore Giacomo Debenedetti è morto nel 1967, quindi ci sarebbe da cancellare (forse) almeno la prima pagina di File:Il Baretti - Anno II, n. 2, Torino, 1925.djvu e anche l'angolo in alto a sx della pagina 2. Te lo segnalo perché non sono sicuro se i diritti siano dell'autore e quindi ancora sotto copyright o dell'editore morto nel 1926 e quindi con copyright scaduti. ValterVB (talk) 17:01, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ValterVB CIao, il caso è simile a quello dei numeri de La difesa della razza contenenti testi di Almirante sotto copyright. Se l'articolo non è pubblicato separatamente, si può tenere, in quanto l'opera collettiva ha il copyright scaduto. Ruthven (msg) 20:15, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Studio Harcourt et PD[edit]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:BrigitteAuber-1954-Harcourt.png

Bonjour ami Ruthven,

J'espère que ton existence IRL et ici ou là sur WP se déroule au mieux. ;)

Si tu as un moment et que tu veux bien donner ton avis concernant les principes (assez pointus il faut le reconnaitre) concernant la collection de photo Studio Harcourt... Comme je tente de l'expliquer à mon interlocuteur avec les refs à l'appui, pour confirmer cette spécificité légale :

  • Les photos de cette collection d'avant 1991 sont considérés appartenir à l'État français et de facto conformément à la réglementation nationale, être automatiquement portée au Domaine Public.
  • Les photos du Studio Harcourt ont été définitivement qualifées d'oeuvres collectives dont aucun de ses différents auteurs ou collaborateurs ne peut être distingué spécifiquement.
  • Même si une mention de copyright contraire est publiée, le domaine public s'applique sur Commons et WP, dès lors que la mention "Studio Harcourt" est clairement spécifiée comme crédit.

On m'oppose certains arguments d'ancienneté d'une photo (70 ans minimum) alors que d'autres photos de la collections Harcourt bien plus récentes ont bien été publiées dans Commons sous licence libre, y compris par les Studio Harcourt eux-mêmes ou par d'autres sources.

Merci de ton aide pour valider ces points très spécifiques au droit et à la règlementation française (J'ai aussi sollicité nos amis Yann et Racconish sur ce point).

Je te souhaite une belle fin de journée et de semaine. Tisourcier (talk) 16:32, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Tisourcier Salut, je passe beaucoup moins de temps sur WP ou Commons dernièrement. Pas trop motivé en vrai...
Laissons tasser la discussion (2 admins sont intervenus aujourd'hui), puis on verrqa comment conclure. Normalement, on n'efface pas des fichiers uniquement parce qu'ils ne sont pas PD dans les EEUU.
Bonne journée ! Ruthven (msg) 13:33, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Coat of arms[edit]

Hello, please do a favor to me. Could you design to me a coat of arms also coloring it as I say to you? Please, I know you are really keen on it. I’ll tell you what to do if you agree to collaborate. 12Akragas12 (talk) 21:30, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@12Akragas12 Hello, I am pretty busy lately, but you can ask to Progetto:Laboratorio grafico/Immagini da migliorare. Even if you write in English, somebody will help you. Ruthven (msg) 13:27, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Italy-CAD-OBD[edit]

Ciao! Visto che l'icona attualmente utilizzata nel template è un jpg di qualità scarsina, ho pensato di creare questo equivalente in vettoriale, che potrebbe andare a sostituire l'attuale. Eventualmente si può ritagliare per mantenere le proporzioni attuali, anche se c'è piuttosto spazio a sx. Fammi sapere se potrebbe andare come sostituzione. Un saluto! Arrow303 (talk) 22:49, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Arrow303 Buona idea! La fai tu la maschera al file svg? Ruthven (msg) 13:26, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Stesse dimensioni del jpg attuale? Arrow303 (talk) 13:30, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Stesse proporzioni. Poi si può scalare. Ruthven (msg) 06:44, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done: File:Open data key 2.svg :) Arrow303 (talk) 09:32, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Grazie Ruthven (msg) 10:01, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pregunta[edit]

@Ruthven:Buenas, una pregunta los boletines electorales (tarjeton electoral, por ejemplo File:Tarjeton Electoral.jpeg) forma parte del sector público o privado?? (Nota:Si el boletin electoral es sector público es posible agregar el {{PD-VenezuelaGov}}) AbchyZa22 (talk) 22:59, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@AbchyZa22 El problema principal es que incluyen datos privados (los logos de los partidos). Si quitas estos logos, el boletín está en el dominio publico. Ruthven (msg) 12:05, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Ruthven:El CNE (forma parte del sector público electoral osea Dominio Público) fue el quien legalizó a los Partidos políticos en Venezuela (es como si el CNE legaliza el logo de un partido político forma parte del Dominio Público.) AbchyZa22 (talk) 15:51, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Legalizar[edit]

@Ruthven:Buenas, una pregunta que pasaría si el CNE (poder electoral, Dominio Público) legaliza el logo de un partido político en Venezuela estará al Dominio Público ({{PD-VenezuelaGov}})?? AbchyZa22 (talk) 01:00, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Como te dije en mi discusión @AbchyZa22, no, porque el que genera el logotipo no es el órgano público o uno de sus empleados sino un partido político. Bedivere (talk) 23:15, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@AbchyZa22 Estoy de acuerdo con Bedivere: los logos están incluidos en {{PD-VenezuelaGov}}), pero unicamente los que son producidos por el sector público o financiados por el. Un partido politico no entra en esta categoria. ¡Un saludo! Ruthven (msg) 12:52, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Teamwork Barnstar
For your services for WLM Italy. That Wikimedia enables photographers to take images of else copyrighted monuments and upload them under a CC license on commons is just fantastic. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 14:52, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Aerolinea estatal en venezuela[edit]

@Ruthven:Buenas que pasaría si el logo de una Aerolínea (por ejemplo Aeropostal y Conviasa) estará al Dominio Público ({{PD-VenezuelaGov}}) porque pertenece al Gobierno venezolano (nombre actual:Gobierno Bolivariano de Venezuela)?? AbchyZa22 (talk) 13:04, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ruthven&oldid=863713766"