User talk:Mike Peel

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to my talk page. Please post new messages at the bottom of my talk page, use headlines when starting new talk topics and sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. I will generally reply on this page to keep conversations together; please watch this page for a short time after leaving a comment. Uncivil comments will be reverted without response. Thank you.

Start a new talk topic.

If you would prefer to contact me off-wiki, then my contact details and a contact form are available on my personal website.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wooden coat hangers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:08, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At London 2024 038.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 20:05, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Long Island 2023 243.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Tilted, see posts in the back in the middle of the imag --Poco a poco 19:07, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Good spot, new version uploaded, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 18:42, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:11, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Long Island 2023 231.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 19:46, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Long Island 2023 267.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 19:43, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At New York, USA 2017 095.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:26, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Air dehumidifier with a European plug.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Tilted a bit --Poco a poco 19:08, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Rotated, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 19:32, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:30, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Montevideo 2023 133.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 18:35, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Montevideo 2023 013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Thi 12:57, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Montevideo 2023 014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Thi 12:57, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Montevideo 2023 089.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:11, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Montevideo 2023 146.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:11, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bramall Hall 2016 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 01:18, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bramall Hall 2016 015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 17:00, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Heaton Park Tramway 2016 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:44, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Heaton Park Tramway 2016 025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Thi 09:57, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Manual QID cleanup[edit]

Hello Mike Peel.

To solve the problem mentioned at User_talk:Radiojunkie#c-Radiojunkie-20240325174800-Enhancing999-20240325164700, maybe the following could work:

  • [..]

Presumably it goes into [1]. Enhancing999 (talk) 20:03, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Enhancing999 and Radiojunkie: Thanks for the suggestion, added and running now. Ideally it needs a regex that can cope with any whitespace, but I'm not too good at writing those. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 18:55, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, but it didn't work. I added tests at [2] and [3] that got skipped. The template syntax seems to be very permissive, see [4]. Here is an attempt with regex, maybe working in python:

import re
target_text = re.sub( r"\{\{\s*[Ww]ikidata Infobox\s*\|\s*\|?\s*qid\s*=\s*" + wd_item.title() + r"\s*",  '{{Wikidata Infobox',  target_text,  re.MULTILINE)

If you prefer the format as in the current code, that should be:

import re
target_text = re.sub( r"\{\{\s*" + wikidatainfobox[i] + r"\s*\|\s*\|?\s*qid\s*=\s*" + wd_item.title() + r"\s*",  '{{Wikidata Infobox',  target_text,  re.MULTILINE)

There are currently >4400 pages in Category:Uses of Wikidata Infobox with manual qid. Some are recent (newer than the bi-weekly import), others due to galleries, plus the ones this should solve. Maybe the import could be done daily as well (instead of Mon and Fri only). Possibly we should drop galleries from Wikidata items.

Enhancing999 (talk) 10:27, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paróquia São Sebastião, Cachoeira Paulista 2017 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tuxyso 12:13, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Estádio do Pacaembu, Sao Paulo 2017 032.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:01, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Paranapiacaba 2019 243.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Трифонов Андрей 08:33, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bramall Hall 2016 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support A bit noisy in the darker areas but still good quality. --MB-one 11:57, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Long Island 2023 239.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:57, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At New York City 2024 291.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 09:29, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At New York City 2024 294.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
cw tilt --Poco a poco 09:33, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for looking, rotated, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 18:27, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:26, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At New York City 2024 386.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
slight ccw tilt --Poco a poco 09:33, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for looking, rotated, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 18:27, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support A bit more correction would have been just perfect, but ok, close enough --Poco a poco 21:26, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At New York City 2024 492.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:33, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bramall Hall 2016 022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 18:30, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Long Island Game Farm 2024 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 09:09, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Long Island Game Farm 2024 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 16:54, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At New York, USA 2017 105.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Thi 20:19, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At New York, USA 2017 106.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Thi 20:19, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Estádio do Pacaembu, Sao Paulo 2017 013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:45, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Estádio do Pacaembu, Sao Paulo 2017 014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:45, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brazilian Decimetric Array 2017 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Looks tilted --Poco a poco 09:01, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've redone the perspective, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 18:31, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Looks worse now, the tilt should be in cw direction --Poco a poco 21:30, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, OK. I've had another go, how's that? Thanks. Mike Peel 08:09, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:49, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]