Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Graffiti in Bristol

Files in Category:Graffiti in Bristol[edit]

No freedom of panorama for 2D works in the UK

17jiangz1 (talk) 05:24, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Keep per {{Non-free graffiti}}--A1Cafel (talk) 08:08, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
Keep The list seems haphazard and the DR should be withdrawn. Files like File:Clifton, oriental graffiti - geograph.org.uk - 854329.jpg are by definition copyright ineligible as they are text only. --Fæ (talk) 09:40, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
Keep the following:
- File:A Better World Is Possible (in Bristol) (49966616121).jpg: Below COM:TOO; a simple statement of fact
- File:Bristol indymedia.jpg: Below COM:TOO; just a URL and a trivial slogan
- File:Bristol MMB W8 Cumberland Basin.jpg: COM:DM; the works are a small part of the scene and each one is only shown in part
- File:Bristol MMB X1 Ashton Avenue Bridge.jpg: Below COM:TOO; trivial tags
- File:Bristol MMB X2 Ashton Avenue Bridge.jpg: Trivial tags below COM:TOO and each one is COM:DM
- File:Bristol MMB X8 Cumberland Basin.jpg: Trivial text below COM:TOO
- File:Bristol MMB «98 Narroways Junction.jpg: COM:DM; the graffiti are at an awkward angle and not the main subject
- File:Bristol MMB «A4 Narroways Junction.jpg: COM:DM; the graffiti are a tiny part of a broad scene
- File:Bristol UK graffiti art3.jpg: I think the face is a sculpture and the mosaic is a work of artistic craftsmanship, so COM:FOP applies to both. The rest is below COM:TOO.
- File:Bristol UK graffiti art4.jpg: This looks like a sculpture to me, so COM:FOP applies
- File:Bristol UK graffiti art6.jpg: This looks like a mosaic, which is a kind of artistic craftsmanship, so COM:FOP applies
- File:Clifton, oriental graffiti - geograph.org.uk - 854329.jpg: I think this is below COM:TOO unless the text is enough to be original (I can't read it)
- File:Hashtag climateaction (47971590826).jpg: A hashtag and a Twitter username do not COM:TOO reach
- File:Sea Mills dock wall and bridge.jpg: Well below COM:TOO and probably COM:DM as well
- File:Strong Words - panoramio.jpg: Below COM:TOO
--bjh21 (talk) 10:04, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
Keep the graffiti, delete the murals - In almost all of these the graffiti is incidental to the subject. Furthermore, per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#Graffiti graffiti is acceptable as proof of authorship of the art is problematic, and, some believe, the artist would have difficulty enforcing their copyright since that would require a court to uphold the validity of an illegal act as the basis for damages or other relief against a third party. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Banksy graffiti. Murals however are a different matter, and I'll accept the deletion of my upload File:Montpelier railway station MMB 02.jpg on those grounds. -mattbuck (Talk) 11:56, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
@Mattbuck: Banksy graffiti? My attempt to restore two still-deleted images of Banksy graffiti (see Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2021-01#File:Banksy Rat with baseball bat Kentish Town 2005-cropped.jpg and Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2021-01#File:Banksy-rat-result-part.jpg) failed, as Thuresson pointed out that nothing on Wiki's policy states that file can only be requested for deletion once. And it seems Banksy seems to claim some IP rights lately from 2019 (unsure if copyright-related or not): [1] and [2]. Not sure if the nominated images here include Banksy works. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:29, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Keep the graffiti This has been covered elsewhere at Commons:Deletion requests/Banksy graffiti--Akrasia25 (talk) 13:05, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
Comment Do not close until Commons:Village pump/Copyright#Graffiti and URAA is resolved. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:07, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Graffiti in Bristol

Files in Category:Graffiti in Bristol[edit]

Navigation menu

Search