User talk:Cayambe
--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Vespa crabro – W Ersange 01 Luxembourg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.  Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 13:57, 7 July 2020 (UTC) |
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Luxembourg - Olm, cimetière forestier 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Luxembourg - Olm, cimetière forestier 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Luxembourg City – Bvd Pierre-Dupong 4–6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Cvmontuy 17:56, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Luxembourg City – Avenue du Dix-Septembre 140.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Carrefour vers ferme Hoeser, Canach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Luxembourg City – Carrefour Avenue du Dix-Septembre – Bvd Pierre-Dupong.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bavigne, Auberge du Lac 2020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Nittel an der Mosel von Luxemburg aus gesehen, 2020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:12, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bavigne, public toilet 2020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:27, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Paysage à l'est de Gostingen, Luxembourg, 2020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Esch-sur-Sure 2020 – Sure, château.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support GQ, geocode would be nice. --Palauenc05 11:51, 1 September 2020 (UTC)  Done Geocode added. Thanks. --Cayambe 21:36, 1 September 2020 (UTC) --Palauenc05 19:59, 3 September 2020 (UTC) |
--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Luxembourg CR316 Eschdorf vers Esch-sur-Sure.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Wayside shrine, CR316, Eschdorf vers Esch-sur-Sûre, Luxembourg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Interesting and good quality -- Spurzem 20:38, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Luxemb Saeul church 2020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Moroder 02:08, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Réserve naturelle Wéngertsbierg – Mur à pierres sèches 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Isiwal 19:39, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Esch-sur-Sure – Op der Lay 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Moroder 20:13, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Esch-sur-Sure – Residenz Laanscht d'Sauer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:45, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Esch-sur-Sure – Op der Lay 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Moroder 12:17, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Drauffelt Duerfwee 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Drauffelt, Wëlzerstrooss – Duerfstrooss.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Esch-sur-Sure castle 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good photo. -- Ikan Kekek 20:42, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Esch-sur-Sure castle 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Café Halte 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
%2c_R%c3%a9sidence.jpg/75px-Eschweiler_(Wiltz)%2c_R%c3%a9sidence.jpg){kind=small} |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Eschweiler (Wiltz), Résidence.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Eschweiler, Duerfstrooss, église.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:25, 25 November 2020 (UTC) |
--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Eglise d'Eschweiler, mémorial George Mergenthaler.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:35, 27 November 2020 (UTC) |
--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Drauffelt – croix de chemin et panneau Escapardenne, Éislek Trail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! George Mergenthaler Memorial 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Moroder 06:09, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! George Mergenthaler Memorial 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Moroder 06:03, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! George Mergenthaler Memorial 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Moroder 06:05, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Villa Baldauff, Octobre 2020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Parc Edmond-Klein, entrée sud-est.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Luxembourg-ville – avenue Marie-Thérèse vers boulevard Royal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Parc Edmond-Klein, Luxembourg-ville – étang 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Bgag 00:50, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Luxembourg-ville, parc Edmond-Klein 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:34, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Parc Edmond-Klein, Luxembourg-ville – étang.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:43, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
Happy holidays 2020/2021![edit]
|
* Happy Holidays 2020/2021, Cayambe! * | |
-- George Chernilevsky talk 13:29, 23 December 2020 (UTC) |
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Luxembourg-ville, parc Edmond-Klein 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Moroder 01:54, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
Happy New year 2021[edit]
|
* Happy New year 2021" Cayambe! * | |
--Pierre André (talk) 10:46, 29 December 2020 (UTC) |
|
Copyright status: File:Luxembourg fortress in 1792 by J. W. von Goethe – Breedewee a Schlassbréck.jpg[edit]
Copyright status: File:Luxembourg fortress in 1792 by J. W. von Goethe – Breedewee a Schlassbréck.jpg
|
| This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Luxembourg fortress in 1792 by J. W. von Goethe – Breedewee a Schlassbréck.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 13:06, 6 June 2021 (UTC)