User talk:Cesco77
| Babel user information | ||
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Users by language |
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Italian surfer.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Im impressed.--Korall 18:29, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Elephant Rock.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Ok --sfu 12:26, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Statue in wind farm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
Comment Chromatic aberration, e.g. see upper margin of head. Can you fix it? --
Done Thanks for your comment, I've tried to fix it, better now? --Passer hispaniolensis[edit]
Ciao Francesco, I've adjusted your nomination here and there ;-). Could you now just add usage please. Gracie. Lycaon (talk) 17:42, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for the update and the promo's. BTW, did you ever see this? Lycaon (talk) 09:20, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Well behind Basilica of Santissima Trinità.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good. --Cayambe 18:37, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
|
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Passer hispaniolensis (Spanish Sparrow), male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Anser Anser Domesticus.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. good --Mbdortmund 11:20, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Four white goose.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Very good. --Cayambe 08:08, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Old Cairina Moschata.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good - Darius Baužys 15:50, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Italian surfer 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. good.--Mbz1 15:13, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
|
FP Promotion[edit]
|
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Anser Anser Domesticus.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Anser Anser Domesticus.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 23:01, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
So would you surf Mavericks?[edit]
Hi Cesco77, I'd like to share with you few images of the waves I took. They are not even close in quality to the nominated image. I took them from shore. The waves were far, far, far away and against the sun, but still this slide show could give you an idea about the waves. There is at least one surfer in every image, but the last one. Best wishes, --Mbz1 (talk) 21:15, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Head of Emys Orbicularis.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good enough for QI. --Cayambe 16:13, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cairina Moschata Portrait.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. {{{3}}}
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pseudemys nelsoni swim.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good. --Cayambe 09:58, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
|
Permission[edit]
Hello.
I have written a book for children about animals that I want to publish. In searching for photographic images, I have found your picture that is very beautiful and fit the storyline that I want to convey. I will appreciate it if you will give me permission to use these photo in my book. Below are the animal that will represents your photo. I will also include all info that will accompany the acknowledgements. I will acknowledge your work - Beneath the photo and at the end of the book, your information. I ask that if you agree, to kindly send me your Name and appropriate information as you wish it to be published.
Photographer: Francesco Canu. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Four_white_goose.JPG Goose.
Thank you very much. Louise - zandtree@yahoo.com
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Slalom race 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Tomer T 11:21, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Slalom Race Sardinia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. {{{3}}}
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Wasp eating grape.ogv, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. I was going to ask you to remove the sound (since it's just white noise), but then there were a few bird cheeps, so maybe it's ok to leave it. The visuals are clear and well lit. --99of9 09:49, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Young Erinaceus europaeus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Palazzo Civico Baccaredda.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. - A.Savin 08:17, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sardinian Sheep portrait.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Hubertl 21:49, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cat illness 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.  Support I don't like this sight. But the quality is OK for me. --Hockei 19:29, 3 February 2015 (UTC) |
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cat illness 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Though it's an awful picture of the cat's desease: good quality. --Dn@lor_01 11:022, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
|