User talk:Felix Koenig
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Löwenstein Blick Breitenauer See Dezember 2013.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. OK --Pleclown 12:52, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Eingang Stift Melk September 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality, balanced composition. --Tuxyso 12:21, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Országház Margit híd Budapest 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:56, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hauptplatz Linz September 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. {{{3}}}
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Neckarwestheim Nuclear Power Plant September 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. OK for me. --Bgag 15:33, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Turm Evangelische Kirche Lustnau Januar 2014.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. But is it downscaled? --Tuxyso 18:00, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kirche Obsteig März 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.  Support Good quality IMO --Halavar 20:58, 14 March 2014 (UTC) |
Batch job[edit]
Hallo Felix, da du ein deutscher "file mover" auf Commons bist, wende ich mich mit einer Bitte zur Umbenennung von ca. 130 Dateien an dich. Ich arbeite aktiv in dem Projekt „Die Gartenlaube“ auf Wikisource. Wie du vielleicht weißt, werden auf WS historische Texte anhand von Digitalisaten aufbereitet. Quasi alle Digitalisate von Seiten der Gartenlaube habe das Namensschema „File:Die Gartenlaube (xxxx) yyy.jpg“, wobei xxxx der Jahrgang und yyy die Seite. Also z. B. File:Die Gartenlaube (1879) 765.jpg. Ausgeschnittene Bilder von Seiten werden laut den Editionsrichtlinien mit einem "b" vor der Seitenzahl gekennzeichnet, also im obigen Fall File:Die Gartenlaube (1879) b 765.jpg.
Leider schlägt der Jahrgang 1873 aus der Reihe mit Bildern im Format „File:Die Gartenlaube (xxxx) pic yyy.JPG“, wie z. B. File:Die Gartenlaube (1873) pic 371.JPG. Wäre es möglich sie alle (130) in einem Rutsch in das Standard-Format „File:Die Gartenlaube (xxxx) b yyy.jpg“ umzubenennen? Damit würde eine Sonderbehandlung bei der systematischen Auswertung der Daten wegfallen. Gruß, --Arnd (talk) 10:42, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rathaus Hechingen August 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. QI when sky fixed (see notes, please). --JLPC 15:39, 5 August 2014 (UTC) Thank you,  Fixed. -- Felix Koenig 13:34, 6 August 2014 (UTC) Support : QI now. --JLPC 15:12, 6 August 2014 (UTC) |
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bebenhausen Juni 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --JLPC 15:03, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
|
Quality image promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Schloss Moritzburg September 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality, even though bit brighter should be better imo.. --JLPC 16:15, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
|
Hi, Felix ! I found this promotion template on my discussion page this morning... but it is your picture : here you are ! -- Best regards. --JLPC (talk) 07:10, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you very much! -- Felix König ✉ 10:20, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
A barnstar for you![edit]
|
The Photographer's Barnstar |
| Für das gelungene Foto der Regiswindis-Kirche in Lauffen am Neckar! Aarp65 (talk) 13:37, 23 September 2014 (UTC) |
- Oooh, danke! :-) Für welches denn: Das oder das? (Ich nehme mal an für das erste, aber man weiß ja nie...) Grüße, -- Felix König ✉ 16:39, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Obelisk Praça dos Restauradores September 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality, although light could be better. --Tuxyso 21:52, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Torre de Belém September 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Cccefalon 17:44, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Schloss Johannisburg Oktober 2012.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:53, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Prag Burg Panorama 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:02, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Traunbrücke Wels September 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:47, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! View from Palau Nacional May 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:47, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Neues Palais Pillnitz September 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --JLPC 15:37, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Museu de Marinha Lissabon Eingang September 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 09:38, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Arco Triunfal da Rua Augusta September 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --JLPC 15:56, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Torre de Belém 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:37, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bergpalais Pillnitz September 2014.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:25, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Torre Vasco da Gama Lissabon September 2014.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Indeed better --Poco a poco 20:38, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Igreja de Santa Engrácia Lissabon September 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Bgag 21:58, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Praça do Município Lissabon September 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --JLPC 16:24, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Alameda Dom Afonso Henriques Lissabon September 2014.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 16:24, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rossio Lissabon September 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:28, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hofkirche Dresden September 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 18:09, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Praça de Touros do Campo Pequeno September 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Overall good quality. Some improvements about CA and perspective are necessary, see my notes --Cccefalon 11:19, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
I uploaded a reworked version (thanks to User:Alchemist-hp). Better now? -- Felix König 09:40, 1 October 2014 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 14:13, 5 October 2014 (UTC) |
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Town hall of Hechingen (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 - Ein Wiki-Beitrag für die Denkmaltopographie[edit]
Hallo Felix Koenig,
vor zehn Tagen endete der vierte Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments. Du hast daran aktiv teilgenommen und wir möchten Dir dafür herzlich danken.
Mit mehr als 35 Tausend Fotos hat Deutschland wie in den Vorjahren ein gutes Ergebnis erreicht und einen Anteil von 14 % an diesem internationalen Projekt erbracht, an dem sich 40 Länder beteiligten. Sehr erfreulich ist die hohe Zahl an 651 Teilnehmern allein in Deutschland. Schon zum Abschluss des Wettbewerbs waren rund 6000 Fotos (=17 %) in Listen und Artikel eingebunden. Einen detaillierten Überblick zu den Fotos, den Bundesländern und Teilnehmern findest du auf unserer WLM-Projektseite.
Die deutsche Jury hat nun die eingereichten Beiträge übernommen und ist gegenwärtig dabei, diesen wertvollen Fotobestand zu den Kulturdenkmalen zu sichten. Am nächsten Wochenende wird in Hamburg die entscheidende Jury-Sitzung stattfinden. Wir wünschen auch Dir mit Deinem Foto-Beitrag dabei viel Glück und Erfolg. Du darfst gespannt sein und all Deine Freunde bitten, Dir die Daumen zu drücken.
Die preisgekrönten 100 Gewinner-Fotos werden in der Woche ab dem 20. Oktober veröffentlicht. Auf dieser Grundlage wird auch in diesem Jahr ein Kalender-Poster für 2015 gedruckt werden.
Auf zwei Möglichkeiten einer weiteren aktiven Mitwirkung an unserem Denkmal-Projekt möchten wir bei dieser Gelegenheit hinweisen bzw. Dich dazu einladen:
- Unsere Freunde in Österreich haben mit einem gerade gestarteten Denkmal-Cup das Editieren von Denkmallisten und Denkmalartikeln in den Focus gerückt. Bis Ende des Jahres kannst Du Punkte sammeln und Preise gewinnen. Dabei geht es mit diesem Wettbewerb nicht nur um Kulturdenkmale in AT oder D, sondern generell um Denkmale in der deutschsprachigen Wikipedia, als offen für alle Länder.
- Vom 6.-8. November findet erneut die Europäische Denkmalmesse in Leipzig statt. Mit Unterstützung von Wikimedia Deutschland e.V. werden wir zum zweiten Mal die Ergebnisse von Wiki Loves Monuments im Rahmen eines Standes sowie eines Workshops vorstellen.
- WLM-Aktivisten sind herzlich eingeladen, bei der Betreuung des Messestandes sowie in den Gesprächen über Möglichkeiten einer partnerschaftlichen Zusammenarbeit mit den Denkmalbehörden mitzuwirken. Die Reisekosten übernimmt für 8-10 registrierte Standbetreuer WMDE. Es muss nicht der gesamte Messezeitraum sein, auch eine Mitwirkung an 2 Tagen hilft uns, den Beitrag der Wikipedia für die Denkmaltopographie sichtbar zu machen.
Und schließlich gilt: Nach dem Wettbewerb ist vor dem Wettbewerb. Bereits jetzt kann jeder mit der Planung von Wiki Loves Monuments 2015 beginnen. Wir freuen uns auf Deine weiteren Beiträge für Wikimedia-Projekte.
Viel Spaß dabei wünscht Dir das Orga-Team.
( Bernd Gross), 11.10.2014
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Altstadt Stiftskirche Tübingen Dezember 2013.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Mattbuck 16:14, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Museu Coleção Berardo Lissabon September 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --JLPC 17:43, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
|
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Carolinensaal Pirmasens (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Info I'm very sorry! Added geocode now. -- Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Fonte Luminosa Lissabon September 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support Good quality. --XRay 10:16, 12 October 2014 (UTC) |
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kirchentellinsfurt Panorama Juli 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:35, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kapellenberg Wurmlingen Juni 2014.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:27, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Schloss Malberg 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Sehr schönes Bild. – QI -- Spurzem 20:01, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
|
New level {{User PH-4}}[edit]
Hi ; new level 4 for you ?--Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 15:33, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
PH-4 | This user is able to take professional quality photographs. |
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Weizbergkirche Februar 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Dnalor 01 21:17, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mühle Unterjesingen 2014.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Hubertl 07:42, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Schloss Tiefurt Weimar 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Hubertl 20:58, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
|
Der WLM-Countdown hat begonnen[edit]
Hallo Felix Koenig,
nun ist es wieder soweit. Vom 1. bis zum 30. September findet zum fünften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Im Mittelpunkt steht bekanntlich das Fotografieren von Kulturdenkmalen. Du hast an einem der letzten Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen und wir freuen uns auf weitere Bildbeiträge von Dir.
Viele interessante Motive, nicht nur Burgen und Schlösser, sondern auch Fachwerkhäuser, Brücken und Brunnen, technische und Industriedenkmale und vieles mehr gibt es noch zu fotografieren, damit sie in der Wikipedia dokumentiert werden können. Nützliche Tipps findest du auf unserer WLM-Projektseite. Du kannst gerne individuell Fototouren durchführen oder aber Dich auch Gruppentouren anschließen. Besonders freuen wir uns auf Fotos, die Lücken in den Denkmallisten der Wikipedia ausfüllen.
Darüber hinaus kannst Du auch an der Arbeit der Jury teilnehmen, die Mitte Oktober die Fotos bewerten und die Gewinner ermitteln wird. Bis zum 15. August kannst du hier Deine Bewerbung einreichen.
Viel Erfolg und Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia in den bevorstehenden Wettbewerbswochen wünscht Dir das Orga-Team. Wir freuen uns auf Deine Fotos.
( Bernd Gross, 6. August 2015)
Notification about possible deletion[edit]
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Kurhaus Bad Liebenzell 2.JPG
- File:Kurhaus Bad Liebenzell 3.JPG
- File:Kurhaus Bad Liebenzell 4.jpg
- File:Kurhaus Bad Liebenzell 5.JPG
- File:Kurhaus Bad Liebenzell 6.JPG
Yours sincerely, Ies (talk) 18:35, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sigmaringen August 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Óðinn 20:02, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Talheim Pano Februar 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. {{{3}}}
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Besigheim Mai 2015.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:27, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hörnle Dürrenzimmern Dezember 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:24, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
QI Tunisia training[edit]
As part of the project Quality images training in Tunisia, the Wikimedia TN user group is looking for a Wikimedia commons User able to organize a training about Quality images, featured pictures, Valued images and Graphic Lab/Photography in Tunisia from February 18th to 22th, 2016. To participate please fill this form --Touzrimounir (talk) 19:20, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kapellenberg Wurmlingen Juli 2014.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Hasenläufer 14:21, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sternwarte Schlossgarten Tübingen April 2014.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality for this stormy sky.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 22:05, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Grafenburg Lauffen Januar 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Tsungam 15:42, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Neckarfront Tübingen 11. Januar 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support OK. --C messier 09:29, 21 January 2016 (UTC) |
--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tübingen Altstadt April 2014.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:14, 3 February 2016 (UTC) |
--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Palácio de São Bento Lissabon September 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:35, 4 February 2016 (UTC)--Famberhorst 17:35, 4 February 2016 (UTC) |
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Stiftskirche Tübingen Januar 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. OK. --A.Savin 15:07, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ostkastell Welzheim Westtor 2014.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:41, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
|
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Bebenhausen Juni 2014.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bebenhausen Juni 2014.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
|
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Sigmaringen August 2015.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sigmaringen August 2015.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 13:05, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bonatzbau Universitätsbibliothek Tübingen März 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support Good quality. --XRay 15:54, 20 March 2016 (UTC) |
--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Neckarfront Tübingen 7. März 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. a little sharp about, but good enough for me.--Famberhorst 16:24, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cattedrale di Santa Maria del Fiore Florenz März 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:45, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Grafenburg Lauffen am Neckar Januar 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Hubertl 18:30, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
|
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Cattedrale di Santa Maria del Fiore Florenz März 2014.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cattedrale di Santa Maria del Fiore Florenz März 2014.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hier kotzte Goethe Martinianum Tübingen März 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality --Halavar 00:38, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Igelhaus Tübingen April 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Hubertl 05:49, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Casino Tübingen April 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Seems tightened slightly, but good enough for me.--Famberhorst 05:55, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Stiftskirche Tübingen April 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.  Comment Tilted little bit CCW. --Halavar 21:11, 21 April 2016 (UTC) Done Thank you, I uploaded a new version. -- Felix Koenig 09:15, 22 April 2016 (UTC) Done Good now. QI for me --Halavar 12:15, 23 April 2016 (UTC) |
--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Casino Tübingen Mai 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:58, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Turm Evangelische Kirche Lustnau April 2016.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:12, 2 May 2016 (UTC) |
--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tübingen Igelhaus April 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Hubertl 16:26, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bahnhof Weimar März 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --A.Savin 01:57, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Alte Aula Tübingen Front Mai 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Ermell 21:53, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hölderlinturm Tübingen Juli 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:00, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Schloss Liebenstein August 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:12, 22 August 2016 (UTC) Question Is it a JPEG image without compression? At the wires it looks like compression. --XRay 16:16, 22 August 2016 (UTC) |
--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Monuments Spain 2016 is coming!Dear Felix Koenig, As every year, Wiki Loves Monuments in Spain, an international photographic contest about cultural heritage in the Spanish territory, will start on next September 1st. On behalf of the Wikipedia community and Wikimedia España (WM-ES), and as a participant in former editions of the event, or in other photographic contests organized by WM-ES, we'd like to encourage you to participate in the 2016 edition. We do know that you've been keen on contributing your work to the free knowledge in the past and therefore believe that you'll be glad to help us again. We want to inform you about a substantial change in the rules of the contest: this year only images of monuments or municipalities without previous photograph in Wikimedia Commons are accepted. To facilitate hunting monuments and municipalities without a free image, we have prepared a set of specific lists, which can be checked in the contest websites: wikilov.es/monuments or wikilm.es If you have comments, questions or suggestions about the contest, they are more than welcome. You can leave them here. We look forward to your free images! Sincerely, |
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Neckarfront Tübingen Juni 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:23, 3 September 2016 (UTC) |
--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Otto-Wagner-Pavillon Wien September 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Ermell 12:56, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Alte Aula Tübingen Juli 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:37, 3 October 2016 (UTC) |
--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hauptplatz Altes Rathaus Bratislava September 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 23:44, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Karlskirche Wien September 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --A.Savin 00:56, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Oberes Belvedere Wien September 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --A.Savin 17:20, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Unteres Belvedere Gartenseite Wien September 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support --Christian Ferrer 13:07, 7 October 2016 (UTC) |
--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Palais Grassalkovich Bratislava September 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:30, 8 October 2016 (UTC) |
--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hauptplatz Bratislava September 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Zcebeci 16:20, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
[edit]
Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.[survey 1] The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.[survey 2] The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.
You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.
Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:05, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
- ↑ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
- ↑ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.
Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey[edit]
(Sorry to write in Engilsh)
Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.
If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.
About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:57, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Institut für donauschwäbische Geschichte und Landeskunde Tübingen Februar 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Ok. --ArildV 08:13, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Frozen Neckar Tübingen January 2017.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. OK for me. --Basotxerri 20:05, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Reminder: Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2016 is open![edit]
You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2016 Picture of the Year contest.
Dear Felix Koenig,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2016 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eleventh edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2016) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category.
In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 2 will end on 20 April 2017, 23:59:59 UTC.
Thanks,
--Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 08:42, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Neckarfront Tübingen August 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. certainly QI. It could make it for Fp with no barrel distortion and unfortunate right crop --Moroder 20:39, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Marktplatz Tübingen Juni 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Berthold Werner 13:26, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Wurmlinger Kapelle August 2017 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:51, 27 September 2017 (UTC) |
--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Wurmlinger Kapelle August 2017 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Ermell 06:42, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Evangelisches Stift Tübingen Juni 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Ermell 16:27, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Burg Stettenfels Oktober 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Disturbing branches at the top right. But image quality is good enough for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:51, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Opernhaus Stuttgart Januar 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:35, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Institut für donauschwäbische Geschichte und Landeskunde Tübingen Februar 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 07:56, 28 February 2018 (UTC) |
--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Institut für Politikwissenschaft Tübingen Februar 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 10:12, 1 March 2018 (UTC) |
--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rathaus Oberes Schloss Talheim April 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Burg Wildeck Abstatt April 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bahnhof Heilbronn-Sontheim Oktober 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ottmarsheimer Tor Gemmrigheim April 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality --Llez 18:24, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Important message for file movers[edit]
A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.
Possible acceptable uses of this ability:
- To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
- To perform file name swaps.
- When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)
Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.
The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Neckarfront Tübingen Ensemble Tübingen Februar 2019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. It's almost good, but it need little perspective correction. --Tournasol7 01:15, 25 December 2019 (UTC) Support Good quality. --Chenspec 19:59, 25 December 2019 (UTC) |
--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Igreja de São José Ponta Delgada September 2019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:32, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Igreja de Nossa Senhora da Mãe de Deus Povoação September 2019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rathaus Tübingen Mai 2020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Felsengärten Neckartal Mai 2019.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Schwabenhaus Tübingen Juli 2020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --KaiBorgeest 23:04, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Stauwehr Tübingen Juli 2020.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Moroder 04:14, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
|