Jump to content

Commons:Featured picture candidates

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Shortcut
This project page in other languages:

Other featured candidates

   📽️ Media

Skip to current candidates Skip to current candidates

Featured picture candidates

Featured picture candidates are images that the community will vote on, to determine whether or not they will be highlighted as some of the finest on Commons. This page lists the candidates to become featured pictures. The picture of the day images are selected from featured pictures.

Old candidates for Featured pictures are listed here. There are also chronological lists of featured pictures: 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025 and current month.

For another overview of our finest pictures, take a look at our annual picture of the year election.

Formal things

Nominating

Guidelines for nominators

Please read the complete guidelines before nominating.

This is a summary of what to look for when submitting and reviewing FP candidates:

  • Licensing – Images licensed with solely "GFDL" or "GFDL and an NC-only license" are not acceptable due the restrictions placed on re-use by these licenses.
  • Resolution – Raster images of lower resolution than 2 million pixels (pixels, not bytes) are typically rejected unless there are strong mitigating reasons. This does not apply to vector graphics (SVGs).
    • Graphics on Commons are not only viewed on conventional computer screens. They may be used in high-resolution print versions, and the images may be cropped to focus on portions of the image. See Commons:Why we need high resolution media for more information.
  • Scans – While not official policy, Help:Scanning provides advice on the preparation of various types of images that may be useful.
  • General quality – pictures being nominated should be of high technical quality.
  • Digital manipulations must not deceive the viewer. Digital manipulation for the purpose of correcting flaws in an image is generally acceptable, provided it is limited, well-done, and not intended to deceive.
    • For photographs, typical acceptable manipulations include cropping, perspective correction, sharpening/blurring, and color/exposure correction. More extensive manipulations, such as removal of distracting background elements, should be clearly described in the image text, by means of the {{Retouched picture}} template. Undescribed or mis-described manipulations which cause the main subject to be misrepresented are never acceptable. For images made from more than one photo, you can use the {{Panorama}} or {{Focus stacked image}} templates.
    • For historic images, acceptable manipulations might include digitally fixing rips, removal of stains, cleanup of dirt, and, for mass-produced artworks such as engravings, removal of flaws inherent to the particular reproduction, such as over-inking. Careful color adjustments may be used to bring out the original work from the signs of ageing, though care should be taken to restore a natural appearance. The original artistic intent should be considered when deciding whether it is appropriate to make a change. Edits to historic material should be documented in detail within the file description, and an unedited version should be uploaded and cross linked for comparison.
  • Value – our main goal is to feature most valuable pictures from all others. Pictures should be in some way special, so please be aware that:
    • almost all sunsets are aesthetically pleasing, and most such pictures are not in essence different from others,
    • night-shots are pretty but normally more details can be shown on pictures taken at daytime,
    • beautiful does not always mean valuable.
Artworks, illustrations, and historical documents

There are many different types of non-photographic media, including engravings, watercolors, paintings, etchings, and various others. Hence, it is difficult to set hard-and-fast guidelines. However, generally speaking, works can be divided into three types: Those that can be scanned, those that must be photographed, and those specifically created to illustrate a subject.

Works that must be photographed include most paintings, sculptures, works too delicate or too unique to allow them to be put on a scanner, and so on. For these, the requirements for photography, below, may be mostly followed; however, it should be noted that photographs which cut off part of the original painting are generally not considered featurable.

Works that may be scanned include most works created by processes that allow for mass distribution − for instance, illustrations published with novels. For these, it is generally accepted that a certain amount of extra manipulation is permissible to remove flaws inherent to one copy of the work, since the particular copy – of which hundreds, or even thousands of copies also exist – is not so important as the work itself.

Works created to serve a purpose include diagrams, scientific illustrations, and demonstrations of contemporary artistic styles. For these, the main requirement is that they serve their purpose well.

Provided the reproduction is of high quality, an artwork generally only needs one of the following four things to be featurable:

  • Notable in its own right: Works by major artists, or works that are otherwise notable, such as the subjects of a controversy.
  • Of high artistic merit: Works which, while not particularly well known, are nonetheless wonderful examples of their particular type or school of art.
  • Of high historic merit: The historical method values very early illustrations of scenes and events over later ones. Hence, a work of poor quality depicting a contemporaneous historical event can be nonetheless important, even if the artistic merit is relatively low. Likewise, scans or photographs of important documents – which may not be at all artistic – nonetheless may be highly valuable if the documents are historically significant. The reason for the image's historical importance should be briefly stated in the nomination, for those reviewers unfamiliar with the subject.
  • Of high illustrative merit: Works that illustrate or help explain notable subjects, for instance, illustrations of books, scientific subjects, or technical processes. The amount of artistic merit required for these will vary by subject, but, for instance, an illustration that makes the working of a complicated piece of machinery very clear need not be notable as a piece of artwork as well, whereas an illustration for a book might well be expected to reach much higher artistic standards.

Digital restorations must also be well documented. An unedited version of the image should be uploaded locally, when possible, and cross-linked from the file description page. Edit notes should be specified in detail, such as "Rotated and cropped. Dirt, scratches, and stains removed. Histogram adjusted and colors balanced."

Photographs

On the technical side, we have focus, exposure, composition, movement control and depth of field.

  • Focus – every important object in the picture should normally be sharp.
  • Exposure refers to the shutter diaphragm combination that renders an image with a tonal curve that ideally is able to represent in acceptable detail shadows and highlights within the image. This is called latitude. Images can be on the low side of the tonal curve (low range), the middle (middle range) or high side (upper range). Lack of shadow detail is not necessarily a negative characteristic. In fact, it can be part of the desired effect. Burned highlights in large areas are a distracting element.
  • Composition refers to the arrangement of the elements within the image. The "Rule of thirds" is one useful guideline. Horizons should almost never be placed in the middle, where they "cut" the image in half. Often, a horizon creating a top or bottom third of the space works better. The main idea is to use space to create a dynamic image.
    • Foreground and background – foreground and background objects may be distracting. You should check that something in front of the subject doesn't hide important elements and that something in background doesn't spoil the composition (for example that the streetlight doesn't "stand" on someone's head).
  • Movement control refers to the manner in which motion is represented in the image. Motion can be frozen or blurred. Neither one is better than the other. It is the intention of representation. Movement is relative within the objects of the image. For example, photographing a race car that appears frozen in relation to the background does not give us a sense of speed or motion, so technique dictates to represent the car in a frozen manner but with a blurred background, thus creating the sense of motion, this is called "panning". On the other hand, representing a basketball player in a high jump frozen in relation to everything else, due to the "unnatural" nature of the pose would be a good photograph.
  • Depth of field (DOF) refers to the area in focus in front of and beyond main subject. Depth of field is chosen according to the specific needs of every picture. Large or small DOF can either way add or subtract to the quality of the image. Low depth of field can be used to bring attention to the main subject, separating it from the general environment. High depth of field can be used to emphasize space. Short focal length lenses (wide angles) yield large DOF, and vice versa, long focal lenses (telephotos) have shallow DOF. Small apertures yield large DOF and conversely, large apertures yield shallow DOF.

On the graphic elements we have shape, volume, color, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, noise, etc.

  • Shape refers to the contour of the main subjects.
  • Volume refers to the three dimensional quality of the object. This is accomplished using side light. Contrary to general belief, front lighting is not the best light. It tends to flatten subject. Best light of day is early morning or late afternoon.
  • Color is important. Oversaturated colors are not good.
  • Texture refers to the quality of the surface of the subject. It is enhanced by side lighting… it is the "feel" to the touch.
  • Perspective refers to the "angle" accompanied by lines that disappear into a vanishing point that may or may not be inside the image.
  • Balance refers to the arrangement of subjects within the image that can either give equal weight or appear to be heavier on one side.
  • Proportion refers to the relation of size of objects in picture. Generally, we tend to represent small objects small in relation to others, but a good technique is to represent small objects large contrary to natural size relationship. For example, a small flower is given preponderance over a large mountain…. This is called inversion of scales.
Not all elements must be present. Some photographs can be judged on individual characteristics, that is, an image can be about color or texture, or color AND texture, etc.
  • Noise refers to unwanted corruption of color brightness and quality and can be caused by underexposure. It is not a desirable quality and can be grounds for opposition.
  • Symbolic meaning or relevance … Opinion wars can begin here … A bad picture of a very difficult subject is better than a good picture of an ordinary subject. A good picture of a difficult subject is an extraordinary photograph.
Images can be culturally biased by the photographer and/or the observer. The meaning of the image should be judged according to the cultural context of the image, not by the cultural context of the observer. An image "speaks" to people, and it has the capacity to evoke emotion such as tenderness, rage, rejection, happiness, sadness, etc. Good photographs are not limited to evoking pleasant sensations …

You will maximise the chances of your nominations succeeding if you read the complete guidelines before nominating.

Video and audio

Please nominate videos, sounds, music, etc. at Commons:Featured media candidates.

Set nominations

If a group of images are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set. A set should fall under one of the following types:

  • Faithful digital reproductions of works notable in their own right, which the original author clearly intended to be viewed as a set. Examples: pages in a pamphlet, crops (puzzle pieces) of a prohibitively large scan, a pair of pendant paintings. Not acceptable: Arbitrary selection of sample works by an artist.
  • A sequence of images showing the passage of time. They could depict frames of a moving/changing object or a static object during different times of day or different seasons. Examples: diagrams illustrating a process, steps of a dance, metamorphosis of an insect, maps/drawings/photos of the same subject over the years (frame of view should be more or less the same).
  • A group of images depicting the same subject from different viewpoints, preferably taken under the same lighting conditions when possible. Examples: Exterior and interior of a building, different facades of a building, different interior views, obverse and inverse of a banknote/coin. Not acceptable: A selection of different rooms in a skyscraper, the facade of a church plus an organ, any images of fundamentally different scopes.
  • A group of images which show all possible variations of a particular class of object. Examples: Male and female versions of an animal (preferably in the same setting), all known species of a genus. Not acceptable: A few breeds of cats (unless they share a defining characteristic and represent all possible examples of that).

Simple tutorial for new users

Tutorial: Nominate on COM:FPC
How to nominate in 8 simple steps

STEP 1

  • STEP 1
    STEP 1

STEP 2

  • STEP 2
    STEP 2

STEP 3

  • STEP 3
    STEP 3

STEP 4

  • STEP 4
    STEP 4

STEP 5

  • STEP 5
    STEP 5

STEP 6

  • STEP 6
    STEP 6

STEP 7

  • STEP 7
    STEP 7

STEP 8

  • STEP 8 (last step)
    STEP 8 (last step)

NOTE: You don't need to worry if you are not sure, other users will try their best to help you.

Adding a new nomination

If you believe that you have found or created an image that could be considered valuable, with appropriate name, quality, image description, categories and licensing, then do the following.

Step 1: copy the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg. Then click on the "create new nomination" button.

All single files:

For renominations, simply add /2 after the filename. For example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2

All set nomination pages should begin "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/", e.g. "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My Nomination".


Step 2: follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save that page.

Step 3: manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Click here, and add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list:

{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg}}

Galleries and FP categories: Please add a gallery page and section heading from the list at Commons FP galleries. Write the code as Page name#Section heading. For example: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Individual sports An image will only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.

Optional: if you are not the creator of the image, please notify them using {{subst:FPC-notice|Your image filename.jpg}} -- ~~~~.

Note: Do not add an 'Alternative' image when you create a nomination. Selecting the best image is part of the nomination process. Alternatives are for a different crop or post-processing of the original image, or a closely related image from the same photo session (limited to 1 per nomination), if they are suggested by voters.

Voting

Editors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Everybody can vote for their own nominations. Anonymous (IP) votes are not allowed.

You may use the following templates:

  • {{Support}} ( Support),
  • {{Oppose}} ( Oppose),
  • {{Neutral}} ( Neutral),
  • {{Comment}} ( Comment),
  • {{Info}} ( Info),
  • {{Question}} ( Question),
  • {{Request}} ( Request).

You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator.

A well-written review helps participants (photographers, nominators and reviewers) improve their skills by providing insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a picture. Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate (which has been carefully selected by the author/nominator). English is the most widely understood language on Commons, but any language may be used in your review. A helpful review will often reference one or more of the criteria listed above.

Unhelpful reasons for opposing include:

  • No reason
  • "I don't like it" and other empty assessments
  • "You can do better" and other criticisms of the author/nominator rather than the image

Remember also to put your signature (~~~~).

Over time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. For these, vote:

Text to use Displays as Meaning
{{Keep}}  Keep It deserves to remain a featured picture.
{{Delist}}  Delist It does not deserve to be a featured picture anymore.

This can also be used for cases in which a previous version of an image was promoted to FP, but a newer version of the image has been made and is believed to be superior to the old version, e.g. a newly edited version of a photo or a new scan of a historical image. In particular, it is not intended for replacing older photos of a particular subject with newer photos of the same subject, or in any other case where the current FP and the proposed replacement are essentially different images. For these nominations, vote:

Text to use Displays as Meaning
{{Keep}}  Keep Do not replace the old image with the new image as a FP.
{{Delistandreplace}}  Delist and replace Replace the current FP with the proposed replacement.

If you believe that some picture no longer meets the criteria for FP, you can nominate it for delisting, copying the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box:


In the new delisting nomination page just created you should include:

  • Information on the origin of the image (creator, uploader);
  • A link to the original FP nomination (it will appear under "Links" on the image description page);
  • Your reasons for nominating the image and your username.

After that, you have to manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list.

As a courtesy, leave an informative note on the talk page(s) of the original creator, uploader(s), and nominator with a link to the delisting candidate. {{subst:FPC-notice-removal}} can be used for this purpose.

General rules

  1. The voting period is 9 complete days counted from the nomination. After the end of this period the result will be determined. Votes added on day 10 and after are not counted.
  2. Nominations by anonymous contributors are welcome.
  3. Contributions to discussion by anonymous contributors are welcome.
  4. Only registered contributors whose Commons accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Exception: registered users can always vote in their own nominations no matter the account age and number of edits.
  5. Nominations do not count as votes. Support must be explicitly stated.
  6. Nominators and authors can withdraw their nominated pictures at any time. This is done by adding the following template: {{Withdraw}} ~~~~. Also, remember that if more than one version is nominated, you should explicitly state which version you are withdrawing.
  7. Remember, the goal of the Wikimedia Commons project is to provide a central repository for free images to be used by all Wikimedia projects, including possible future projects. This is not simply a repository for Wikipedia images, so images should not be judged here on their suitability for that project.
  8. Rules of the 5th day based on vote counts on day number 5 (day of nomination + 5):
    1. Pictures are speedy declined if they have fewer than two support votes.
    2. Pictures are speedy promoted if they have 10 support votes or more and no oppose votes. (Note that if it takes more than five days to reach this threshold, the picture can be promoted as soon as it is reached.) This does not apply to nominations containing at least one ‘Alternative’ image – because it is possible that another image can overtake the one in the lead during the last days, such nominations are never closed early.
    3. Once either speedy criterion is reached, the voting period is considered closed, and no more votes may be added.
  9. Pictures tagged {{FPX}} may be removed from the list 24 hours after the tag was applied, provided there are no support votes other than that of the nominator.
  10. Pictures tagged {{FPD}} (FP-Denied) may be removed from the list 24 hours after the tag was applied.
  11. Only two active nominations by the same user (that is, nominations under review and not yet closed) are allowed. The main purpose of this measure is to contribute to a better average quality of nominations, by driving nominators/creators to choose carefully the pictures presented to the forum.

Featuring and delisting rules

A candidate will become a featured picture in compliance with following conditions:

  1. Appropriate license (of course)
  2. At least seven  Support votes (or 7  Delist votes for a delist) at the end of nine days
  3. Ratio of supporting/opposing votes at least 2/1 (a two-thirds majority); same for delist/keep votes
  4. Two different versions of the same picture cannot both be featured, but only the one with higher level of support, as determined by the closer. Whenever the closer is not sure which version has consensus to be featured, they should attempt to contact the voters to clarify their opinions if not clear from the nomination page.
  5. Only two active delisting nominations per user, which is in addition to the limit of two active regular nominations.

The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period. The rule of the 5th day is applied to delisting candidates that have received no votes to delist, other than that of the proposer, by day 5.

The FPCBot handles the vote counting and closing in most cases, current exceptions are candidates containing multiple versions of the image as well as FPXed and withdrawn nominations. Any experienced user may close the requests not handled by the bot. For instructions on how to close nominations, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished. Also note that there is a manual review stage between when the bot has counted the votes and before the nomination is finally closed by the bot; this manual review can be done by any user familiar with the voting rules.

Above all, be polite

Please don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone else's. Choose your words with care.

Happy judging… and remember… all rules can be broken.

See also

Table of contents

List may contain works considered Not Safe for Work (nudity).

Nominators are requested, out of courtesy, to include the {{Nsfw}} template with such images. Users may select the gadget in user preferences "Deferred display of images tagged with {{Nsfw}} on COM:FPC" to enable the template's effect of hiding the image until selected.

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache
Shortcut

File:Karl Marx by John Jabez Edwin Mayall 1875 - Restored.png

Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2025 at 08:41:20 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Photographic portrait of Karl Marx by John Jabez Edwin Mayall, restored

File:Coral red kukri (Oligodon kheriensis) from Cooch Behar, West Bengal, India.jpg

Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2025 at 06:01:17 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Only good photograph of Oligodon kheriensis on Wikimedia Commons

File:Cedar Creek reenactment VA6.jpg

Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2025 at 00:29:15 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Confederate cavalry reenactors at Cedar Creek Battlefield, Middletown, Virginia, USA
Moving horses are a challenge, much less six of them, but the riders interested me. I wanted to do something a little out of the ordinary for FP, where static images tend to predominate, including in my own shots. Acroterion (talk) 01:08, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Even with the slow-moving horse in the other FP candidate, one hoof is a little blurred. And different parts of a moving horse go in different directions, quickly, while the rider's doing something else. These weren't fully galloping, but it makes little difference if it's a trot, canter or gallop. Nearly every FP we have of horses is static, and many of those few that are moving have blur somewhere. - Acroterion (talk) 01:26, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ford Model 91A at Torkham - Annemarie Schwarzenbach.jpg

Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2025 at 19:14:53 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ford Model 91A at Torkham - Annemarie Schwarzenbach.jpg

File:Mahatma Gandhi leaves Presidency Jail in Calcutta.jpg

Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2025 at 16:19:37 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Mahatma Gandhi leaves the Presidency Jail in Calcutta after interviewing political prisoners

File:The Kelpies at The Helix in Falkirk, Scotland, June 2014.jpg

Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2025 at 15:05:14 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Kelpies at The Helix in Falkirk, Scotland.

File:Porta Soprana Exterior Close Genoa Italy Sep23 A7C 06588.jpg

Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2025 at 14:51:19 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Perspective view of Porto Soprana, Genoa, Italy

File:La pietra tagliata - Cennina - Bucine.jpg

Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2025 at 09:55:24 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The cut stone, at the medieval Cennina Castle (Bucine - Tuscany)

File:Бишкек, навозник белый в Карагачёвой роще.jpg

Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2025 at 08:50:09 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Coprinus comatus In Karagach grove. Sverdlov district, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan.

File:Cravo de defunto Tagetes patula.jpg

Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2025 at 06:14:35 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION


 Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: At only 0.345 MPx, this photo is far below the minimum of 2 Mpx that is required for FPC, please read the full rules before nominating. --Cart (talk) 10:27, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply] Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:Sea fig.jpg

Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2025 at 06:14:53 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:ZZ Top performing at Caesars Windsor, 2025-06-18 20.jpg

Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2025 at 01:05:16 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Billy Gibbons of ZZ Top performing in 2025
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/People#Musicians_and_singers_performing
  •  Info - I lucked out when ZZ Top came through; the entire concert was lit by bright white lights. This full-length portrait shows guitarist and vocalist Billy Gibbons in what I think is an excellent context, surrounded by musical instruments and amplifiers (and a bubble machine in the background). I wish the phone made nicer bokeh, but I won't get that one. All by Crisco 1492 --  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:05, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support --  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:05, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support I think this photo deserves a little bit of love (or at least some attention ;–). The size/resolution is not giant and not everything is tack sharp, but we all know how difficult it is to get a good photo from a concert. The compo and the colours are very good; no unfortunate crop of an arm or leg, no irritating elements, etc. And for a smartphone the quality is very good: even at pixel level this image looks like a real photo, not like the usual overcooked mash traditionally delivered by phones. – Aristeas (talk) 08:57, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blacktip reef shark (Carcharhinus melanopterus) Moorea 5.jpg

Voting period ends on 4 Jul 2025 at 21:16:52 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Blacktip reef shark (Carcharhinus melanopterus) Moorea

File:Lac de Cap-de-Long (22).jpg

Voting period ends on 4 Jul 2025 at 19:50:48 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lac de Cap-de-Long in commune of Aragnouet, Hautes-Pyrénées, France

File:Lac d'Aumar (10).jpg

Voting period ends on 4 Jul 2025 at 19:47:37 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lac d'Aumar in commune of Vielle-Aure, Hautes-Pyrénées, France

File:Barrilete negro (Euthynnus lineatus), San José del Cabo, Baja California, México, 2024-12-21, DD 16.jpg

Voting period ends on 4 Jul 2025 at 18:29:50 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Black skipjack tuna (Euthynnus lineatus), San José del Cabo, Baja California, Mexico · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Black skipjack tuna (Euthynnus lineatus), San José del Cabo, Baja California, Mexico

File:Close wing nectaring position of Graphium macareus (Godart, 1819) - Lesser Zebra 1.jpg

Voting period ends on 4 Jul 2025 at 03:50:56 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Close wing nectaring position of Graphium macareus (Godart, 1819) - Lesser Zebra 1.jpg

File:Striped blue crow butterfly.jpg

Voting period ends on 4 Jul 2025 at 03:15:53 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Interior of Willistead Manor (two chairs by window), Windsor, Ontario, 2025-06-07.jpg

Voting period ends on 4 Jul 2025 at 01:49:44 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Interior of Willistead Manor, with two chairs

File:Western Flycatcher (Pacific-Slope).jpg

Voting period ends on 3 Jul 2025 at 22:16:57 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Hamerkop eating fish, South Africa - 2023-1.jpg

Voting period ends on 3 Jul 2025 at 22:10:31 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Red fox (Vulpes vulpes crucigera) Skalnate Pleso 2.jpg

Voting period ends on 3 Jul 2025 at 21:26:43 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Red fox (Vulpes vulpes crucigera)

File:Pez mariposa barbero (Johnrandallia nigrirostris), Cabo Pulmo, Baja California, México, 2024-12-19, DD 19.jpg

Voting period ends on 3 Jul 2025 at 19:53:08 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Blacknosed butterflyfish (Johnrandallia nigrirostris), Cabo Pulmo, Baja California, Mexico

File:Црква „Успение на Пресвета Богородица“ - Ѓавато.jpg

Voting period ends on 3 Jul 2025 at 19:51:18 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Dormition of the Theotokos Church in the village of Ǵavato

File:Pascoli montani e cespuglieti pratomagno 4.jpg

Voting period ends on 3 Jul 2025 at 09:53:05 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Mountain pastures and meadow shrubs
  •  Oppose Sorry, I can't see anything outstanding here. Half of the image is empty blue sky and the rest of the motif is lacking wow. Loss of detail in full resolution, looks tilted and the crop looks random. --Milseburg (talk) 12:20, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hiking trail to Biskupská kupa, Czechia.jpg

Voting period ends on 3 Jul 2025 at 09:33:10 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Hiking trail to Biskupská kupa, Czechia

File:راع يقود جمله.jpg

Voting period ends on 3 Jul 2025 at 06:33:11 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A herder leading his camel in a calm desert atmosphere.

File:Close wing moisture sucking and peeing activity of Lamproptera curius ( Fabricius,1787) - White Dragontail.jpg

Voting period ends on 3 Jul 2025 at 04:41:09 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Close wing moisture sucking and peeing activity of Lamproptera curius ( Fabricius,1787) - White Dragontail.jpg

File:USNavy air-cushioned landing craft about to dock aboard USS Iwo Jima-2025.jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2025 at 22:33:13 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

U.S. Navy air-cushioned landing craft prepares to dock aboard the USS Iwo Jima (LDH 7) during training in the Atlantic Ocean (May 2025).

File:Panoramique Lac Blanc Croix Belledonne.jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2025 at 21:46:50 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Panoramic view of Lac Blanc and Couttet Peak, Isère

File:Jacobite on Glenfinnan Viaduct 2 20211024.jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2025 at 21:46:47 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

"The Jacobite" crossing Glenfinnan Viaduct

File:Rathaus Borås.jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2025 at 20:23:05 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The townhall in Borås, Sweden.

File:White house with a small beach in Norra Grundsund, panorama.jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2025 at 19:06:07 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

White wooden house with a small beach and an old motorboat in Norra Grundsund, Lysekil Municipality, Sweden.
Even though much of the Swedish west coast is afflicted by tourism, there are places like this where little has changed. Houses that are renovated or replaced, stay true to the previous designs. Even the carefully preserved small motorboat is the same as some 80 years ago. The weather this close to Skagerrak is very harsh all through the year, and vegetation seldom grows taller than the nearest sheltering cliff. All by me, -- Cart (talk) 19:06, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Honestly not seeing any quality flaw here. The worst I can see is that the far left of the image is not quite as sharp as the rest, likely because the lens's edge sharpness is a little less. But even that looks well within acceptable limits to me. Can you tell me where you are seeing these issues Osmo Lundell? Cmao20 (talk) 02:40, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:الصورة الرسمية للأمير محمد بن سلمان بن عبدالعزيز آل سعود.jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2025 at 16:44:39 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Official portrait of Mohammed bin Salman Al Saud, Crown Prince and Prime Minister of Saudi Arabia
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Men
  •  Info created by Saudi Press Agency – uploaded by ARABCREATOR7 – nominated by ARABCREATOR7 -- ARABCREATOR7 (talk) 16:44, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support -- ARABCREATOR7 (talk) 16:44, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support -- E.IMANCOMMONS 17:38, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Hi ARABCREATOR7, the categories for this photo were a total mess, but I've cleared them up best I could for you and added a few other relevant ones. The date for the photo should not be the upload date, so I changed it to the date provided by the camera's Exif data. Since this is a studio photo, no exact location is required. I know this is an official photo, but it could be better edited in post-processing, it's a bit overexposed in the bright areas and a few other small things can be fixed. I've made a suggestion for you here. You can use it however you like (overwrite or upload). Best, --Cart (talk) 18:18, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Mainly for the resolution: 2,761 × 1,981 for a camera which can give 4,928 × 3,280 pixels. Yann (talk) 18:55, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Mainly per Yann but I also don't like the extreme contrast that has turned his shoulder completely black with just one thin outline visible Cmao20 (talk) 22:08, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose I have a problem with the image quality, I had expected a good level of detail, it is rather noisy. I also have a problem with the item, but that's not a valid criteria to oppose Poco a poco (talk) 16:23, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    TBH, I would consider the problem with the subject to be a reason to support, rather than oppose—an FP of him would mean the picture can be a POTD, where, in the caption, one could talk about his position, his politics, the reforms he has undertaken, and indeed the assassinations he has ordered, with a careful consideration of due weight according to reliable sources. Same goes for other political (and otherwise) figures. We must not conflate support for FP with endorsement of the subject. UnpetitproleX (Talk) 21:05, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    The photos we promote here are primarily for encyclopedias and such works contains images of some pretty bad things too. We have a lot of them already, just look in the 'History' section. It can be very hard to look at some of these images and stay neutral as we should (trust me, I made the first free image of Kim Jong Un, a revolting task, but the image was needed for articles). But this is how it is to collect high quality images for the wiki work. It would look rather loop-sided if only the nice images were good and all the bad images also had bad quality. --Cart (talk) 00:49, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Open wing mud-puddling position of Graphium cloanthus (Westwood,1841) - Glassy Bluebottle.jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2025 at 14:55:32 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Open wing mud-puddling position of Graphium cloanthus (Westwood,1841) - Glassy Bluebottle.jpg
But Ahh! I see what you mean, I had accidentally inserted a second "Genus : Graphium" in the wrong place. Bad mistake, and thank you very much for making me aware that something was wrong. Much appreciated. I've removed the faulty place so the nom now points to the right section. I always have trouble spotting the difference between the words "Papilionoidea" and "Papilionidae". And Atudu, while you were right "species-wise", the sorting done by the FPCBot can only go to one specific heading (in this case 'Genus : Graphium') on one specific page (in this case 'Papilionoidea'), so I understand if it looks a bit weird when writing the name of the Genus right after the name of the Superfamily. And if you, Charles, have some other points to discuss about the Lepidoptera gallery pages, could you please post that on the FPC talk page, since I'm not the only one involved in the galleries. Again, thank you for being so vigilant. --Cart (talk) 21:36, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I must have forgotten to hit Publish. Sorry Cart. I have posted my comments about recent errors on the FPC talk page. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:40, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much for your help. I truly appreciate your support. I’ll be sure to keep this in mind for my next nomination. Atudu (talk) 02:31, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Schloss Schwetzingen - Nördlicher Zirkelbau 02.jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2025 at 10:30:47 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Northern Circle Building by Alessandro Galli Bibiena built 1748 - 1750, Schwetzingen Palace, Schwetzingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
Discussion on perspective/projection
  •  Comment A very good and beautiful photo. I’m sorry to say so but I have a problem with the projection. The photo makes the Nördlicher Zirkelbau look like a long straight or slightly convex building; but actually it is a long concave building (see map; the photo shows the view from south-west to north-east). IMHO the projection makes the photo a bit misleading. Could the projection be changed in order to show the concave shape of the building? That would be great! – Aristeas (talk) 14:06, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    •  Info This photo was taken from the center of the circle the building describes. The distance to all parts of the building is the same, so the building appears straight (If the building were straight, it would be curved in the projection). I chose this viewpoint deliberately. The further you move away from this center, the more curved the building appears. See from this photo to here to here to here. The building is bent in realitiy, but it is the point of view, if the building looks straigt or bent, perhaps even planned and intended by the architect Alessandro Galli Bibiena. Illusion was a major theme in Baroque architecture. This also includes the Trompe l'oeil painting popular at this time. --Llez (talk) 15:39, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
      •  Comment Wow, this is a really interesting question, because IMHO the answer depends on how you look at this resp. which kind of lens or perspectival drawing technique we assume. If somebody stands in the centre of the circle and turns their head or eyes slowly, the building will indeed appear straight, just as you describe it; and the same applies if we think of an ideal panorama created by turning the camera in countless steps on the nodal point, or (as here) if we create a panorama with concave cylindrical projection, or if we use a fish-eye lens, or if we draw a simple (non-perspectival) architectonic Aufriss of the facade like e.g. here. But I remember very well that if I stand at the centre of the circle and do not turn my head or eyes, but just look at the centre of the Zirkelbau, the façade appears slightly curved to the left and to the right; and the same happens if I take a single-shot photo of the Zirkelbau with a rectilinear wide-angle lens. Why? The optics of a rectilinear lens reproduce all parts of a straight facade (if photographed at right angle) at the same size, although the far left and right parts are further away from the camera than the centre (that’s the point of a rectilinear lens); therefore it reproduces the outer parts of a concave facade slightly larger than the central part. The same happens if I just look at the centre of the facade without turning head or eyes. It’s a pity that we do not have an exact counterpart to this panorama taken with a single rectilinear wide-angle shot; then the comparison would be obvious. This photo is rather weak and not wide enough, but if you check the measurements (high in pixels) of the left, central and right parts, you see that the outer parts appear slightly larger than the central parts and that the roofs rise to the left and to the right. This would be much more obvious if the photo was wider. However I understand that you like the effect, and have chosen the projection by intent, so I respect your artistic intention. – Aristeas (talk) 18:18, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hurshidbanu Natavan with her children.jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2025 at 08:25:13 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Barn swallow dancing.jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2025 at 03:51:47 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Црква „Св. Петка“ - Маловиште.jpg

Voting period ends on 1 Jul 2025 at 22:46:43 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Saint Paraskeva Church in the village of Malovište

File:"The Bandit of Point Loma - a stirring western showing how the light-house keeper captured a marauding desperado" restored.jpg

Voting period ends on 1 Jul 2025 at 21:02:19 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

"The Bandit of Point Loma - a stirring western showing how the light-house keeper captured a marauding desperado"
✓ Done thanks!!! Ezarateesteban
Done, thanks!!! Ezarateesteban
 Support thank you Cmao20 (talk) 00:08, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done, thanks!!!! Ezarateesteban
Part of it is still there, but I trust you will take care of it. --Cart (talk) 16:46, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed, thanks!!! --Ezarateesteban 17:14, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
One "!" is enough, no need to shout in every post, we hear you. ;) --Cart (talk) 18:56, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Green bee eater pair.jpg

Voting period ends on 1 Jul 2025 at 19:26:52 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Two Asian green bee-eaters (Merops orientalis) perch gracefully with their catch, showcasing their vibrant plumage and expert hunting skills.

File:Friars' Crag Derwentwater Lake District 2022 01.jpg

Voting period ends on 1 Jul 2025 at 17:46:00 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View across Strandshag Bay of Derwentwater in the early morning with Friars' Crag on the left and Lord's Island on the right.

File:Golden-winged Laughingthrush 0A2A6646.jpg

Voting period ends on 1 Jul 2025 at 15:41:34 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Elmas göl.jpg

Voting period ends on 1 Jul 2025 at 10:55:57 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lake Burdur is one of the important lakes of Turkey, but has been drying up rapidly in recent years and has shrunk by 50% today. The water sources that give life to the lake become visible because the waters of the lake recedes.

File:Tug ship BOKA STRIKER. IMO 9737230. 12-06-2025 (d.j.b.). 02.jpg

Voting period ends on 1 Jul 2025 at 04:31:14 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Trail to Churdhar peak, Himachal Pradesh, India.jpg

Voting period ends on 29 Jun 2025 at 15:53:08 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Trail to Shiva shrine at Churdhar peak at dusk, Himachal Pradesh, India

File:Taormina BW 2025-04-27 09-32-30.jpg

Voting period ends on 29 Jun 2025 at 15:49:41 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Baspa Valley under snow, Kinnaur, Himachal Pradesh, India.jpg

Voting period ends on 27 Jun 2025 at 11:56:48 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Baspa Valley under snow, Kinnaur, Himachal Pradesh, India

Alternative

Alt


Timetable (day 5 after nomination)

Sun 22 Jun → Fri 27 Jun
Mon 23 Jun → Sat 28 Jun
Tue 24 Jun → Sun 29 Jun
Wed 25 Jun → Mon 30 Jun
Thu 26 Jun → Tue 01 Jul
Fri 27 Jun → Wed 02 Jul

Timetable (day 9 after nomination, last day of voting)

Wed 18 Jun → Fri 27 Jun
Thu 19 Jun → Sat 28 Jun
Fri 20 Jun → Sun 29 Jun
Sat 21 Jun → Mon 30 Jun
Sun 22 Jun → Tue 01 Jul
Mon 23 Jun → Wed 02 Jul
Tue 24 Jun → Thu 03 Jul
Wed 25 Jun → Fri 04 Jul
Thu 26 Jun → Sat 05 Jul
Fri 27 Jun → Sun 06 Jul

The bot

Note that the description below is for manual closure, this is mostly not needed anymore as there exists a bot (FPCBot) that counts the votes and handles the process below. However after the bot has counted the votes a manual review step is used to make sure the count is correct before the bot again picks up the work.

Manual procedure

Any experienced user may close requests.

  1. In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
    Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
    {{FPC-results-reviewed|support=x|oppose=x|neutral=x|featured=("yes" or "no")|gallery=xxx (leave blank if "featured=no")|sig=~~~~}}
     (for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Bridge (August 2013).jpg). See also {{FPC-results-reviewed}}.
  2. Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
    featured or not featured
    For example:
    === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
    becomes
    === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], featured ===
  3. Save your edit.
  4. If it is featured:
    • Add the picture to the list of the four most recently featured pictures of an appropriate gallery of Commons:Featured pictures, list as the first one and delete the last one, so that the number is four again.
    • Also add the picture to the appropriate gallery and section of Commons:Featured pictures, list. Click on the most appropriate link beneath where you just added it as one of the four images. An image should only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.
    • Add the template {{Assessments|featured=1}} to the image description page.
      • If it was an alternative image, use the subpage/com-nom parameter: For example, if File:Foo.jpg was promoted at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bar.jpg, use {{Assessments|featured=1|com-nom=Bar.jpg}}
      • If the image is already featured on another wikipedia, just add featured=1 to the Assessments template. For instance {{Assessments|enwiki=1}} becomes {{Assessments|enwiki=1|featured=1}}
    • Add the picture to the chronological list of featured pictures. Put it in the gallery using this format: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
      • The # should be replaced by 1 for the first image nominated that month, and counts up after that. Have a look at the other noms on that page for examples.
      • You may simplify this if multiple things were done by the same user. E.g.: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created, uploaded, and nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
    • Add == FP promotion ==
      {{FPpromotion|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the Talk Page of the nominator.
  5. As the last step (whether the image is featured or not; including {{FPX}}ed, {{FPD}}ed and withdrawn nominations), open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination you've just finished closing. It will be of the form:
    {{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
    Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/June 2025), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.

Closing a delisting request

  1. In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
    Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
    '''Result:''' x delist, x keep, x neutral => /not/ delisted. ~~~~
    (for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/Image:Astrolabe-Persian-18C.jpg)
  2. Also edit the title of the delisting candidate image template and add after the image tag
    delisted or not delisted
    For example:
    === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] === becomes === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], delisted ===
  3. Move the actual template from Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list to the bottom of the actual month page on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/June 2025.
  4. If the outcome was not delisted, stop here. If it is delisted:
    1. Remove the picture from Commons:Featured pictures, list and any subpages.
    2. Edit the picture's description as follows:
      1. Replace the template {{Featured picture}} on the image description page by {{Delisted picture}}. If using the {{Assessments}} template, change featured=1 to featured=2 (do not change anything related to its status in other featured picture processes).
      2. Remove the image from all categories beginning with "Featured [pictures]" (example: Featured night photography, Featured pictures from Wiki Loves Monuments 2016, Featured pictures of Paris).
      3. Remove the "Commons quality assessment" claim (d:Property:P6731) "Wikimedia Commons featured picture" from the picture's Structured data.
    3. Add a delisting-comment to the original entry in chronological list of featured pictures in bold-face, e. g. delisted 2007-07-19 (1-6) with (1-6) meaning 1 keep and 6 delist votes (change as appropriate). The picture in the gallery is not removed.
  5. If this is a Delist and Replace, the delisting and promotion must both be done manually. To do the promotion, follow the steps in the above section. Note that the assessment tag on the file page and the promotion tag on the nominator's talk page won't pick up the /replace subpage that these nominations use.

Manual archiving of a withdrawn nomination

  1. In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
    In the occasion that the FPCbot will not mark withdrawn nominations with a "to be reviewed" template and put them in Category:Featured picture candidates awaiting closure review just like if they were on the usual list, put the following "no" template:
    {{FPC-results-reviewed|support=X|oppose=X|neutral=X|featured=no|gallery=|sig=--~~~~}}
  2. Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
    not featured
    For example:
    === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
    becomes
    === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], not featured ===
  3. Save your edit.
  4. Open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination. It will be of the form:
    {{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
    Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/June 2025), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Featured_picture_candidates&oldid=1034523849"