Commons:Deletion requests/File:Fuzhou Metro logo.svg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fuzhou Metro logo.svg

This file was initially tagged by Larryasou as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G4|Commons:Deletion requests/File:Fuzhou Metro Logo.svg
Converted by me to regular DR to allow for discussion about whether such a relatively simple logo is indeed assumed to be copyright under PRCs jurisdiction. This image is less complex then the formerly deleted one, which also contained a portion of text. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:27, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, non-free logo meet the COM:TOO China (compare with the LY and Gang Heng logos). Larryasou (talk) 09:02, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, this is not a simple logo. Taivo (talk) 16:04, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fuzhou Metro logo.svg

This file was initially tagged by Wcam as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G4|Commons:Deletion requests/File:Fuzhou Metro Logo.svg Yann (talk) 19:01, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Some people claim that the proposed ones do not meet the requirements of "TOO China", but why are there no problems with other ones such as: File:Guangzhou Metro logo.svg, File:Guangzhou Metro icon.svg, and File:Amoy Metro logo.svg? However, the person who proposed the deletion could not produce any evidence at all（Image Links:File:Fuzhou Metro logo.svg, File:Fuzhou Metro icon.svg）. 御坂雪奈 (talk) 19:07, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@People who have participated in similar discussions:@User:TimWu007 @User:Ankry @User:Liuxinyu970226 @User:Sam_Sailor. 御坂雪奈 (talk) 19:07, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Larryasou and DR above. This logo is more complex than the LY and Gang Heng logos that are ruled to be subject to copyright protections by courts. Wcam (talk) 19:10, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If we really want to follow your so-called

Delete, why didn't you file a lawsuit together when it came to Guangzhou Metro and Xiamen Metro?So my opinion is:

Speedy keep.Thank you! 御坂雪奈 (talk) 19:18, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tend to

Speedy keep and consider whether Wcam shall be removed from our adminships, this looks like abuse of speedy deletion tag. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 21:26, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Info The uploader seems to be out of touch with the threshold of originality in mainland China. I hereby list some typical logos that have been ruled to be protected by copyright in China. Do you think this logo is simpler than the following ones? --0x0a (talk) 23:16, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]