Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kloster Ebrach BW 5.JPG
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Kloster Ebrach BW 5.JPG, featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Jun 2010 at 15:52:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created - uploaded - nominated by -- Berthold Werner (talk) 15:52, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
Support -- Berthold Werner (talk) 15:52, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
Oppose Strong noise, some CA, not really sharp and not very satisfying composition. --Niabot (talk) 16:00, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
- Ich habe schon gewartet. --Berthold Werner (talk) 16:04, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
- Lag jetzt aber nur an der Aufmerksamkeit. Du musst zugeben, dass das Bild im unteren Bereich wirklich absäuft und oben überbelichtet wirkt. Das Kontrastverhältnis scheint mir nicht zu stimmen. Es wirkt so als würde man geblendet in die Sonne schauen. Zudem vermisse ich schmerzlich etwas mehr Detail, da das Motiv dieses an sich zu bieten hätte. Wäre mal ein Fall für dezentes HDR und Stitching. --Niabot (talk) 16:09, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
- Unfortunatly there is no tripod allowed, therefore no HDR and no stitching. So I tried to take most out of the RAW File and the contrast may seem artificial. --Berthold Werner (talk) 16:46, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
- Lag jetzt aber nur an der Aufmerksamkeit. Du musst zugeben, dass das Bild im unteren Bereich wirklich absäuft und oben überbelichtet wirkt. Das Kontrastverhältnis scheint mir nicht zu stimmen. Es wirkt so als würde man geblendet in die Sonne schauen. Zudem vermisse ich schmerzlich etwas mehr Detail, da das Motiv dieses an sich zu bieten hätte. Wäre mal ein Fall für dezentes HDR und Stitching. --Niabot (talk) 16:09, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
- Ich habe schon gewartet. --Berthold Werner (talk) 16:04, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
- Support I see little or no CA, the sharpness is OK, and the noise isn't that bad. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 22:57, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
- Support I can't fault the composition and there is a lot less noise than there probably would be if I took it :-). Daniel Case (talk) 03:54, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
- Support, but only just . . . I wish they could find some less obtrusive method of lighting, without all those ugly hanging black wires ;-) MPF (talk) 08:50, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose -- Sorry but image quality is not good enough. I also don't like the extensive out of focus parts. Alvesgaspar (talk)
- Support — MZaplotnik (my contribs) 19:29, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose. To me the bottom of the picture seems to be missing. Snowmanradio (talk) 18:02, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Karel (talk) 21:29, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 20:16, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors
