Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Miami Beach, FL - Panorama (1).jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Miami Beach, FL - Panorama (1).jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2010 at 20:12:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info View from Lummus Park of Miami Beach, Florida. All by -- ianaré (talk) 20:12, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
Support -- ianaré (talk) 20:12, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 20:41, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
Oppose - good technical quality, but not a terribly interesting looking place, just a load of rather dreary skyscrapers - MPF (talk) 08:37, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
- it is what it is ... though if you look closely, you'll see that there are in fact several architectural styles represented, from art deco style of the 1940s to modern designs. Not my type of vacation either, but people from all over the world do go there (and spend ridiculous sums of money). This is also the the biggest and most famous beach in the area. --ianaré (talk) 11:19, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
Support, because of the former comment. --Tintero (talk) 18:22, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
Oppose - For aesthetical reasons. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 08:36, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
Support Strong support Per author, it is what it is, we can`t delete the skyscrapers :-). Iadrian yu (talk) 19:32, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
Support Excellent picture! Gives a good impression of what the place really is. Reflects the atmosphere of the spot also very well, as far I remember from a short visit over there some years ago (where I did not spend ridiculous sums of money at all...). Technically well done - except a few stitching flaws in the sky, which can easily be resolved - and good encyclopedic value. -- MJJR (talk) 20:13, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
Support --Lošmi (talk) 01:53, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
Support --Pudelek (talk) 13:13, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
Oppose Show a lot of details. Snowmanradio (talk) 20:08, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
Oppose - As Alvesgaspar. --Karel (talk) 16:36, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 07:44, 4 June 2010 (UTC)