Jump to content

User talk:Trade

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Trade!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 15:09, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Say no to Christmas Island mural in Newtown, New South Wales (5403612761).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 09:23, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cuaderno de Evangelion (51136106107).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Solomon203 (talk) 05:35, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 2025 – About the NickRewind YouTube channel

[edit]

Hello. Not all freely-licensed content from NickRewind is a depiction of a separately copyrighted work or is subject to trademark protection. For example, those templates would be inapplicable for stills of Tom Kenny, Joey Graceffa or any other people from File:Voice Acting Tips with Tom Kenny.webm.
On a related note, I have also created a new tag, {{Free depiction (Nickelodeon)}}, to replace the standard "free depiction" tag for Nickelodeon works. JohnCWiesenthal (talk) 19:13, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

when are we actually supposed to use Free depiction (Nickelodeon) Trade (talk) 08:42, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
"Free depiction (Nickelodeon)" would be used instead of "Free depiction" for Nickelodeon works. I am currently in the process of swapping the templates. (I did something similar with Cartoon Network a week or so ago.) JohnCWiesenthal (talk) 12:23, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
What about iCarly or Victorious? Trade (talk) 13:49, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The tag would apply to those too, as they are both Nickelodeon television series. The tag is not limited to just Nicktoons. JohnCWiesenthal (talk) 14:21, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Have you ever consiiered becoming an reviewer? Trade (talk) 16:39, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected files:

SergioFLS (talk) 17:32, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Auntof6 (talk) 10:47, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why?

[edit]

Why did you add File:Craig Field.ogv to Category:Videos about manslaughter when it has nothing to do with manslaughter! Suggest you check next time! Bidgee (talk) 17:07, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Growing Up Creepie Now on Kabillion.webm

العربية  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  Bahasa Melayu  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ತುಳು  Türkçe  українська  中文  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  中文(臺灣)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Growing Up Creepie Now on Kabillion.webm. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{self|cc-zero}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 20:05, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:True Jackson VP Theme Song - First 5 Minutes! Starring Keke Palmer.webm

العربية  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  Bahasa Melayu  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ತುಳು  Türkçe  українська  中文  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  中文(臺灣)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:True Jackson VP Theme Song - First 5 Minutes! Starring Keke Palmer.webm. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{self|cc-zero}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 22:12, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tagged even though the linked pages have CC BY 4.0 licenses

[edit]

Hello, I'm very confused by why these two images (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:ZeldaVylet.jpg and https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fish_whisperer.jpg) were tagged as lacking permission. The files were taken directly from Vylet Pony's wiki pages that they own, so I'm not sure why this requires further evidence of permission. Thank you for your time GregariousMadness (talk) 22:19, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It is common practice that we need more verification when someone uploads album covers and similar to Commons, even when the person who uploaded them is the musician themselves
All you have to do is to get Vylet Pony to send an email to commons-copyvio@wikimedia.org and have her confirm that all images listed on her Wiki are released under the CC BY 4.0 license. Trade (talk) 23:38, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This doesn't make sense to me. Their own site, listed as source, is clear about the license. How will VRT make that any clearer? - Jmabel ! talk 00:23, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
We dont know if he's the album cover artist. VRT would help clear this up Trade (talk) 00:39, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Jmabel: @Trade: The problem is that it's quite difficult to contact Vylet Pony themselves... I'm really not sure why the license on their own website isn't sufficient here. They did not create the album artwork, but it belongs to them as they own the rights to the album and everything on it. GregariousMadness (talk) 08:12, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Category discussion warning

English words has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Prototyperspective (talk) 11:31, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Re: "with red eyes"

[edit]

I'm sorry, but I'm not understanding the point of the microcategories when the parent gallery is already small. This is just compartmentalizing things to make the categories harder to navigate for users. The category structure on here is already a mess in regards to the cosplay section. Kung Fu Man (talk) 13:48, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just because an character have "special" eye color it does not mean that all the cosplayers use colored contact lenses Trade (talk) 13:55, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
That's not so much the point I'm making Trade, I'm saying doing the character separation in this manner is making the galleries harder to get the proper scope of and adding unnecessary splitting up. Something like "cosplays with red eyes" or similar would work a lot better without disrupting the parent, no?--Kung Fu Man (talk) 13:56, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
That only makes it harder to find red eyed cosplay of an specific character Trade (talk) 14:03, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Again, I feel this is a level of excessiveness. We may as well argue there should be a subcat for Ayane in swimwear, or Reaper without a mask, because "someone may be looking for those". There's a point where "Keep It Simple, Stupid" should apply. D.Va's category mess already shows how out of control that can get as is. There's a reason english user wikipedia editors in the Video Game project complain about the mess that is a lot of the commons categories.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 14:13, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Are we not gonna discuss the fact that you marked the categories empty despite it very clearly not being the case? Gives an impression that you cannot be trusted with using the SD template Trade (talk) 14:29, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm trying to discuss this subject with you, assume good faith. Some categories you've created, such as "Cosplay of Jubilee and Akuma", are literally just...one image. Trying to use bureaucracy isn't going to change that. At least consider my argument.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 14:48, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Category discussion warning

Threshold of originality-related deletion requests in Albania has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 10:48, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]