User talk:PantheraLeo1359531
Archiv 0 | Archiv 2020 | Archiv 2021 | Archiv 2022 | Archiv 2023 | Archiv 2024
 First steps tutorialOur first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.  Getting helpMore information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
 Goodies, tips, and tricks
 Made a mistake?
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Regenbogentor in Krötenbruck 20241215 HOF8682 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Baufortschritt Eppenreuther Straße 20241215 HOF8666 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Weißes Hof und Natur an Silvester 20241231 HOF0110-HDR RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Weißes Hof und Natur an Silvester 20241231 HOF0102 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sony FE 70–200mm F4 Makro G OSSⅡ 20250109 HOF0823-HDR RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Weißes Hof und Natur an Silvester 20241231 HOF9833 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Weißes Hof und Natur an Silvester 20241231 HOF9809 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sony FE 70–200mm F4 Makro G OSS II 20250109 HOF0811 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Winter und Natur in Hof 20250111 HOF1008 RAW-Export (2) corr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Winter und Natur in Hof 20250111 HOF0994 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Winter und Natur in Hof 20250111 HOF1052 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Neujahrstag in Hof 20250101 HOF0186 Raw Export cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! JCRG – Klassenzimmer 20240904 HOF2371-HDR RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Neujahrstag in Hof 20250101 HOF0244 Raw Export cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Winter in Krötenbruck 20241224 HOF9526 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Winter und Nacht in Hof 20250111 HOF1097 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hofer Weihnachtsmarkt 20241130 HOF8358 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! JCRG – Klassenzimmer 20240830 HOF0294 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
[edit]
I like your profile!
Petmaster100 (talk) 23:15, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you very much, I adore it :D --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 07:58, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Unterkotzauer Weg 20250106 HOF0318 RAW-Export cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Unterkotzauer Weg 20250106 HOF0346 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Unterkotzauer Weg 20250106 HOF0359 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Die Linke-Wahlplakat zur BTW 2025 20250130 HOF2667 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Baumkrone 20250130 HOF2657 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Wandern in Hof-Pirk 20250202 HOF2986 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Otterbach und Fußballplatz 20250130 HOF2659 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Unterkotzauer Weg 20250106 HOF0322 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Unterkotzauer Weg 20250106 HOF0352 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Schild für den Netto Marken-Discount 20250202 HOF3032 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
Vorweihnachtliches Magdeburg
[edit]Du hast da Bilder vom vorweihnachtlichen Magdeburg hochgeladen und in die Weihnachtsmarkt-Kategorie gepackt. Aber nur die Hälfte sind auch vom Weihnachtsmarkt, die andere Hälfte ist vom Platz zwischen Dom und Landtag vom Category:Magdeburg Domplatz Lichterwelt 2024. Auch auf dem Weihnachtsmarkt gab es "Lichterwelt". Umgekehrt gab es auf dem Domplatz aber keinen Weihnachtsmarkt, sondern nur den Hauptteil der Lichterwelt. C.Suthorn (@Life_is@no-pony.farm - p7.ee/p) (talk) 15:47, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
- Ah danke für den Hinweis, da war jemand schnell :). Hab es korrigiert, Grüße --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 16:13, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Piper-Flugzeug in Hof-Pirk 20250202 HOF2802 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Krötenbruck zur goldenen Stunde 20250204 HOF3093 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 8 February 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Wandern in Hof-Pirk 20250202 HOF2981 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
Hof-Demo
[edit]Ist das so gewollt mit der doppelten Kategorie, einemal mit dem Zusatz " (JPG)"? C.Suthorn (@Life_is@no-pony.farm - p7.ee/p) (talk) 08:54, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
- jep, das eine Format ist das Archivformat, das andere ist eine stark komprimierte Variante (für QIC, Einbinden, etc.) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 13:16, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
- Ah, dann aber vielleicht einen kurzen Erklärungstext in die beiden Kategoriebeschreibungen? Dass die Dateien einmal die Endung png und einmal jpg haben, hatte ich nicht gesehen. Sah für mich eher wie ein Serverschluckauf aus, bei dem identische Dateien doppelt katgorisiert sind. Und das "jpg" als Namensergänzung habe ich auch erst bemerkt, nachdem ich die Katgorienamen minutenlang angesehen habe. Ich dachte es sei zweimal derselbe Name, einmal mit einem Tippfehler drin, erst zuletzt habe ich gesehen, dass der "Tippfehler" am Ende ist, und die Ergänzubng "jpg" für ein Unterscheidungmerkmal zwischen Fotos, Videos, Audios und PDFs gehalten. C.Suthorn (@Life_is@no-pony.farm - p7.ee/p) (talk) 15:33, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
- Klar, mache ich, kein Problem und danke für den Hinweis ;) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 15:54, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
- Ah, dann aber vielleicht einen kurzen Erklärungstext in die beiden Kategoriebeschreibungen? Dass die Dateien einmal die Endung png und einmal jpg haben, hatte ich nicht gesehen. Sah für mich eher wie ein Serverschluckauf aus, bei dem identische Dateien doppelt katgorisiert sind. Und das "jpg" als Namensergänzung habe ich auch erst bemerkt, nachdem ich die Katgorienamen minutenlang angesehen habe. Ich dachte es sei zweimal derselbe Name, einmal mit einem Tippfehler drin, erst zuletzt habe ich gesehen, dass der "Tippfehler" am Ende ist, und die Ergänzubng "jpg" für ein Unterscheidungmerkmal zwischen Fotos, Videos, Audios und PDFs gehalten. C.Suthorn (@Life_is@no-pony.farm - p7.ee/p) (talk) 15:33, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Demonstration Stell' deinen Wecker auf Demokratie! 20250208 HOF3219 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 12 February 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Demonstration Stell' deinen Wecker auf Demokratie! 20250208 HOF3179 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Demonstration Stell' deinen Wecker auf Demokratie! 20250208 HOF3333 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Demonstration Stell' deinen Wecker auf Demokratie! 20250208 HOF3207 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Uferstraße 27 20250106 HOF0691 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Steinbruch an der Kläranlage 20250106 HOF0528 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Schloßweg 20250106 HOF0509 RAW-Export cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Honeywell SPERIAN FALL PROTECTION Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG 20250106 HOF0744-HDR RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bushaltestelle Schloßweg 20250106 HOF0492 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Demonstration Stell' deinen Wecker auf Demokratie! 20250208 HOF3202 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Demonstration Stell' deinen Wecker auf Demokratie! 20250208 HOF3196 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Verbandskläranlage Hof 20250106 HOF0602 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Verbandskläranlage Hof 20250106 HOF0590 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Verbandskläranlage Hof 20250106 HOF0578 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Verbandskläranlage Hof 20250106 HOF0548 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Verbandskläranlage Hof 20250106 HOF0558 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Nahaufnahme Haus Theresienstein im Winter am 16.02.2025 HOF3991 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Nahaufnahme Haus Theresienstein im Winter am 16.02.2025 HOF4007 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Nahaufnahme Haus Theresienstein im Winter am 16.02.2025 HOF3988 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Nahaufnahme Haus Theresienstein im Winter am 16.02.2025 HOF3987 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Aufgehangene Schuhe am Lettenbachsee 16.02.2025 HOF4204 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
 |
Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:LFG-Con 2024 in Hof (Saale) HOF3425 RAW-Export.png. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a derivative work of a non-free work, please explain why on the file's talk page.
|
Yours sincerely, Grandmaster Huon (talk) 18:18, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! "Vögeln & Füttern verboten" 20250224 HOF4459 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Grand-Duc (talk) 20:03, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
Baustellenschilder, Wahlwerbung u.a.
[edit]Hallo PantheraLeo,
danke für Deine großartigen Photos und Deine tolle Arbeit hier auf Commons.
Mit Interesse las ich Deinen Hinweis bei der Diskussion zu Grand-Ducs Löschanträgen zu deutschen Baustellenschildern bezüglich der Werbung auf Omnibussen, deren photographische Veröffentlichung bzw. Weiterverbreitung von einem deutschen Gericht offenbar urheberrechtlich als zulässig angesehen wurden.
Auch hast Du auf Commons offenbar selber Photos von deutschen Wahlplakaten veröffentlicht.
Dies läßt mich die vergangene Diskussion mit Gnom bezüglich der Löschanträge auf meine Fotos von Wahlplakaten wieder in Frage stellen:
- Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Wahlplakat_zur_Landratswahl_15._April_2018,_Kreis_Weimarer_Land,_Dr.-Ing._Julian_Schwark,_SPD.jpg
- Commons:Deletion_requests/File:FDP_Wahlplakat_Thüringen_2024.jpg
Fotos von deutscher Wahlwerbung wurden in der Vergangenheit offenbar überwiegend gelöscht.
Hast Du dazu eine Meinung?
liebe Grüße, KaiKemmann (talk) 14:14, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
- @KaiKemmann: Hi lieber Kai und danke für dein Lob, das freut mich sehr zu hören :). Die Thematik von Werbung auf Omnibussen habe ich hier noch mal gefunden: https://www.lto.de/recht/hintergruende/h/bgh-urteil-izr24715-aida-kussmund-foto-bewegtes-objekt-schiff-urheber-werbung-marke/2. Die Panoramafreiheit in DE ist in manchen Fällen eine Interpretationsfrage, besonders bei Begriffen wie "bleibend".
- Und die Thematik mit den Wahlplakaten wurde und wird hier fleißig diskutiert. Die Einen sagen, dass die Panoramafreiheit greife, da die Schilder teils nur während ihres Aushängens existieren (nur zum Zwecke der öffentlichen "Präsentation") und dann ggf. weggestellt oder vernichtet werden, und die Schilder meist praktisch 1 Monat oder länger hängen. Andere, die tendenziell vorsichtig sind und Begriffe strenger auslegen, sehen Wahlplakate wie Werbeplakat an Plakatflächen, die da nur 2 Wochen hängen und dann wieder weg sind (nicht bleibend). Momentan ist man wegen COM:PCP eher bei Letzterem, solange nicht Ausnahmen wie freie Lizenzen oder "oberhalb der Schöpfungshöhe". Ich habe meine Wahlplakate vorsichtshalber löschen lassen, aber es kann durchaus sein, dass irgendwann eine Gerichtsentscheidung diesbezüglich Klarheit schafft. Meinungen, Erkenntnisse und Rechtsauffassungen können sich jederzeit ändern. Bei Sonderfällen wie "vergessenen" (Wahl-)Plakaten lässt sich auch trefflich streiten.
- Bei Bautafeln sehe ich aber einen "bleibenden" Charakter. Sie sind so konstruiert ("gebaut"), dass sie lange stabil da stehen (eben auch länger als 1 Jahr) und "an öffentlichen Straßen" sowieso. Die Tafeln werden ja in die Öffentlichkeit gestellt, um der Gesellschaft lange genug Informationen zu präsentieren (und in Deutschland wissen wir ja sehr gut, das Baustellen lange dauern können (bei uns in Hof Wilhelmstraße 3 ca. 2021–2025; FOS/BOS 2020–mind. 2025; Neubau an Sana Klinikum 2021–vrs. 2025. Und die Tatsache, dass sie wieder entfernt werden, hebt eine Panoramafreiheit nicht auf. An einer Realschule wurde mal das Logo an der Straße geändert, aber es hatte eben "bleibenden" Charakter. Die Panoramafreiheit in Deutschland ist tendenziell eher großzügig ausgelegt. Deshalb halte ich die Löschdiskussion (auch aus anderen Gründen) für überzogen. Liebe Grüße und weiterhin frohes Schaffen :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 14:34, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
- Klasse, danke. Ich habe gerade einmal in der Diskussion, die dem Löschantrag von Grand-Duc offenbar vorausging, auf den Legal-Tribune-Artikel verwiesen.
- Besten Dank auch für den Verweis auf das "precautionary principle". Ich hatte schon vermutet, dass sich viele der Löschanträge aus einem solchen Prinzip herleiten bzw. im Zweifel damit begründet werden würden.
- Wobei die dortige Formulierung "where there is significant doubt about the freedom of a particular file, it should be deleted." natürlich wieder alles davon abhängig macht, wie man 'significant doubt' im jeweiligen Fall auslegen wollte.
- liebe Grüße, KaiKemmann (talk) 12:42, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
- @KaiKemmann:
- Es kommt auch oft einfach darauf an, wer die Diskussionen mitbestimmt. Es gibt einige Leute, die sich auch nur beim kleinsten Verdacht immer auf diese Richtlinie beziehen, was ich eher für destruktiv halte und die Wahrscheinlichkeit einer Wiederherstellung nach der Löschung deutlich erhöht. Aber es gab auch schon Diskussionen, die sich gegen eine Löschung entschieden. Aber du hast Recht, "bemerkenswerte Zweifel" ist Auslegungssache. Meine Befürchtung ist nur, dass im Falle einer Entscheidung für das Löschen wie bei den Wahlplakaten immer neue Bautafeln hinzukommen, die wieder gelöscht werden etc., oder gar ein Umschwenken kommt (hatte ich auch schon erlebt).
- Jetzt in dem Fall könnte ich mir vorstellen, dass ein Admin sagt, dass eine solche generelle Löschantragssituation abgelehnt wird, da die Dateien einzeln betrachtet werden müssen. Und ob sich jemand die Mühe macht, das für jede Datei durchzuziehen... Es gibt sogar Userbox-Templates, die man sich auf seine Nutzerseite legen kann, um seine Position dazulegen:
_HOF3425_RAW-Export.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_HOF3425_RAW-Export.png){kind=link}
 | This user finds copyright paranoia disruptive. |
- Bei der iPhone-Thematik kann ich dir leider wenig helfen. Ja, die iOS-App wird schon länger hervorgebracht, aber leider tut sich da nicht viel. Wenn ich Inhalte unkenntlich machen muss, ziehe ich mir die Inhalte auf den PC und mache das mit Photoshop, wo ich bspw. eine Maske oder einen Effekt über einen Bereich legen kann (einzelne Farbe oder Weichzeichner), und lade das dann so hoch :)
- Wenn du Fragen oder Anregungen hast, schreibe sie mir gerne :D. Liebe Grüße --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 13:52, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
- PS: Hast Du einen zufällig Vorschlag, wie man Gesichter auf Photos am besten unkenntlich machen kann?
- Und ein iPhone benutzt Du nicht zum Fotografieren, oder? Eine App zum Hochladen der Bilder vom iPhone wäre nämlich auch ganz praktisch. Das hiesige Projekt dazu scheint eingeschlafen zu sein.
 |
File:Gentlemen in Business and Politics - 53865122065.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Mike Rohsopht (talk) 12:07, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
FM promotion
[edit]This file has been promoted to Featured media!
The file File:Enten baden am Knollenteich 20250204 C1125.webm, which you nominated at Commons:Featured media candidates/File:Enten baden am Knollenteich 20250204 C1125.webm, has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another file, please do so. |
|
--Cart (talk) 17:58, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! JCRG – Korridor HOF7659-HDR RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Antennenmast auf Labyrinthberg am Märzsonntag 20250302 HOF4748 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Blick über Krötenbruck zur goldenen Stunde 20250305 HOF5013 RAW-Export cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Max-Reger-Straße im März 20250302 HOF4943 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hofer Innenstadt am Märzsonntag 20250302 HOF4891 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hofer Innenstadt am Märzsonntag 20250302 HOF4888 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
FP Promotion
[edit] |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Splashscreen Blender 4.2 LTS – Gold (8000×4500).png, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Splashscreen Blender 4.2 LTS – Gold (8000×4500).png has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Brücke des Q-Bogens 20250302 HOF4920 RAW-Export cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Zungenzeigender Einstein am Sand 20250302 HOF4799 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bismarckturm zur goldenen Stunde 20250305 HOF5018 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 20 March 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ansichten vom Untreusee 20250316 HOF5276 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ansichten vom Untreusee 20250316 HOF5477 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ansichten vom Untreusee 20250316 HOF5427 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ansichten vom Untreusee 20250316 HOF5424 RAW-Export corr1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ansichten vom Untreusee 20250316 HOF5381 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ansichten vom Untreusee 20250316 HOF5314 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Baufortschritt des Zentrums für Wasser- und Energiemanagement 20250322 HOF5685 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Baustelle an Sana Klinikum Hof 20250322 HOF5740 RAW-Export cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hochschule in Hof 20250322 HOF5693 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! IHK Oberfranken Bayreuth 20250319 (55406).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Wohnhaus an Waldstraße, Am Otterberg 20250322 HOF5921 RAW-Export cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Waldstraße 20250322 HOF5925 RAW-Export cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Otterberg und Umgebung 20250322 HOF5868 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
|
|
File:Outdoor umbrellas 16k – HDR-Panorama (Sergej Majboroda via Poly Haven).tif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
176.2.193.170 15:19, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Comment Invalid rationale in my opinion --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 15:31, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Verfallenes Haus 20250322 HOF6097 RAW-Export cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Question about images from NOAA
[edit]Hi. I'm read up on the whole thing with NOAA's website potentially shutting down and whatnot. I was wondering if you have some kind of standard for what your mirroring from it though. Going by things like Category:Cdn.star.nesdis.noaa.gov/GOES18/ABI/CONUS/13/, it seems like your just doing mass uploading to Commons regardless of anything else. I have serious doubts that a lot of the images in that and similar categories are even educational or useful to begin with. The naming of the categories don't really help either. I get the motivation behind backing up the NOAA website, but this the purpose of the project isn't to be a complete mirror of other sites. So I was wondering what your plan is here besides just doing an indiscriminate complete 1/1 dump of the NOAA site to Commons. Since I don't think it would be a good idea or serve the project well. Adamant1 (talk) 09:17, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
- Ok, yeah I wanted to back up the data as a precaution. :) So what could be a better solution --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 09:58, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
- Maybe start by not doing daily backups of tens of thousands of images that look exactly the same and have questionable educational value. Otherwise it's just going to lead to a bunch of deletion requests. There's absolutely zero reason to do daily backups of every image taken by a satellite every 5 minutes. At best it's totally pointless since 99% of the images are exactly the same, at worst your using Commons a personal file host. Just pick some images that are worth backing up and leave it at that. It's ridiculous to upload tens of thousands of images of the same exact thing to Commons just because the site might shut down though. Commons doesn't exist to be an up to the minute mirror of other websites. --Adamant1 (talk) 10:17, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
- Ok, understood --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 11:27, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
- Maybe start by not doing daily backups of tens of thousands of images that look exactly the same and have questionable educational value. Otherwise it's just going to lead to a bunch of deletion requests. There's absolutely zero reason to do daily backups of every image taken by a satellite every 5 minutes. At best it's totally pointless since 99% of the images are exactly the same, at worst your using Commons a personal file host. Just pick some images that are worth backing up and leave it at that. It's ridiculous to upload tens of thousands of images of the same exact thing to Commons just because the site might shut down though. Commons doesn't exist to be an up to the minute mirror of other websites. --Adamant1 (talk) 10:17, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Zwischenprüfung Mediendesigner Digital (März 2025) HOF6307 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! FFF-Demo in Hof (Saale) 20250214 HOF3735 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
FM promotion
[edit]This file has been promoted to Featured media!
The file File:Rehe am Feld am Lausenhof 20250321 C1203.webm, which you nominated at Commons:Featured media candidates/File:Rehe am Feld am Lausenhof 20250321 C1203.webm, has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another file, please do so. |
|
Cart (talk) 12:13, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
File tagging File:Context02 (Charlotte Baglioni via Poly Haven).webp
[edit]
|
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Context02 (Charlotte Baglioni via Poly Haven).webp. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Adeletron 3030.
I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion (shown above) or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 16:05, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
.webp){kind=link}
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ortskern Haidt 20250427 HOF8347 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 30 April 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Amazon NUE1 20250427 HOF8578 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 1 May 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Baustelle Bismarckturm 20250429 HOF8998-HDR RAW-Export corr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Baustelle Bismarckturm 20250429 HOF8973-HDR RAW-Export corr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Seagate EXOS 28TB (recertified) 20250430 HOF9386 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
Moin PantheraLeo, geht dieser SLA für dich ok, oder hattest du mit dem Schwarzbildern noch etwas geplant? --Túrelio (talk) 09:02, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
@User:Turelio: Guten Tag, ich hätte sie gerne behalten. :) Die Vorschau ist kaputt. Es handelt sich um HDR-Fotos, die genau Bildinformationen wie JPEGs enthalten, nur dass sie die komplette Helligkeitsreichweite beinhalten. Ich habe sie für archivalische Zwecke mit hochgeladen (da sie die höchste Qualität haben, als PNG oder JPEG), da es eine historische Kirche handelt. Ich werde mal ein Ticket im Phabricator einfügen.
Beispiel File:Hospitalkirche 20241221 HOF9117-HDR RAW-Export.tif:
File:Hospitalkirche 20241221 HOF9117-HDR RAW-Export.tif ist komplett schwarz. Heruntergeladen und in Photoshop geöffnet, ist die Datei ganz normal zu betrachten. Liebe Grüße --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 12:26, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
- Ich habe mal das Thema angebracht: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T393331 --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 12:30, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
- Addendum: Das Foto lässt sich auch korrekt mit freien Bildbetrachtern wie GIMP öffnen --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 12:32, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
- Ich wollte mal EXR als Dateiformat hinzufügen, da das üblicher für HDR-Fotos ist und auch relativ verbreitet ist, wurde aber abgelehnt. Da wäre eine Thumb-Erzeugung ggf. leichter --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 12:36, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
- Ich habe mal das Thema angebracht: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T393331 --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 12:30, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
- Ok. Ich habe den SLA entfernt. --Túrelio (talk) 12:37, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
- Vielen Dank :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 13:01, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
- Ok. Ich habe den SLA entfernt. --Túrelio (talk) 12:37, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Gewerbepark Hochfranken – Neubau 20250427 HOF8526 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tafel an St2452 zum amazon-Logistikzentrum 20250427 HOF8614 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
 |
File:POTUS ♥️ FLOTUS (TTtgs Sw4R0).webm has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: Duplicate: File:POTUS ❤️ FLOTUS.webm)
Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk. |
User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Koavf.
I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion (shown above) or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 08:06, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
_20210914_HOF06314cens.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
|
|
File:Ansicht Schloss Stolberg (Harz) 20210914 HOF06314cens.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ras67 (talk) 23:44, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
_20210914_HOF06314cens.jpg){kind=link}
|
|
File:President Donald J. Trump’s Commencement Address at the University of Alabama.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
—Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:49, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
|
|
File:President Trump Delivers Remarks at the University of Alabama Commencement.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
—Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:49, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
Your speedy delete request on Category:User:PantheraLeo1359531/Tafeln
[edit]Hello, PantheraLeo. Your speedy request on this category gives the reason "Construction boards are not considered under COM:FOP in Germany". That sounds like it applies to the files, not the category. Am I missing something? Is it the category you want deleted or the files? If the files, then please address the issue at the file level with a deletion request. If the category, please empty it first, then it can be deleted either as an empty category or as a category belonging to you. Thanks. -- Auntof6 (talk) 13:30, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
- Ok thanks, I will do so :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 13:57, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Albert-Einstein-Straße Infotafel Hof 20210530 DSC00166.jpg
- File:Ansicht Schloss Stolberg (Harz) 20210914 HOF06314cens.jpg
- File:Baufortschritt ZWE Hof 20230422 HOF01231 RAW-Export.png
- File:Baufortschritt ZWE Hof 20230422 HOF01350 RAW-Export.png
- File:Bauschild Schaller 20230917 HOF00068 RAW-Export.png
- File:Baustelle am Oberen Torplatz in Hof (Saale) 20230424 115002.jpg
- File:Baustelle am Sana Klinikum Hof 20230409 HOF09717 RAW-Export.png
- File:Baustelle Johann-Vießmann-Schule 20240522 003.jpg
- File:Baustelle Oberer Torplatz (Hof (Saale)) 20230508 HOF02052 RAW-Export 1.png
- File:Baustelle Oberer Torplatz (Hof (Saale)) 20230508 HOF02053 RAW-Export.png
- File:Baustelle Oberer Torplatz (Hof (Saale)) 20230508 HOF02055 RAW-Export.png
- File:Baustelle Sana Klinikum Hof 20221204 HOF06816 20221206000069.png
- File:Baustelle Sana Klinikum Hof 20221204 HOF06825 20221206000075.png
- File:Bautafel altes Rentamt 20230906 HOF08453 RAW-Export.png
- File:Bautafel altes Rentamt 20230906 HOF08455 RAW-Export.png
- File:Bautafel Generalsanierung der Fachoberschule 20241130 HOF8281 RAW-Export.png
- File:Bautafel Logistikzentrum der Bayerischen Polizei 20231228 HOF03702 RAW-Export cens.png
- File:Bautafel Revitalisierung Ernst-Reuter-Straße 119 20231228 HOF03768 RAW-Export.png
- File:Bautafel zur Hofer Kläranlage 20250106 HOF0521 RAW-Export.png
- File:Bautafel zur Hofer Kläranlage 20250106 HOF0575 RAW-Export.png
- File:Infoschild Sanierung FOS Hof 20201105 Dsc5591121620 00RAW.jpg
- File:Infotafel Außenanlagen Rathaus 20230526 HOF04494 RAW-Export cens.png
- File:Infotafel Baumaßnahme Haus Theresienstein 20230521 HOF03882 RAW-Export.png
- File:Infotafel Baumaßnahmen Altstädter Schule Hof 20201210 DSC6873.jpg
- File:Infotafel Baustelle AWO Großküche HOF01289.png
- File:Infotafel Baustelle Sana Klinikum Hof 20221204 HOF06817 20221206000070cens.png
- File:Infotafel Baustelle Sana Klinikum Hof 20221204 HOF06821 20221206000072.png
- File:Infotafel bei Handswerkskammer für Oberfranken 20220728 HOF07646 RAW-Export.png
- File:Infotafel Generalsanierung der Fachoberschule 20220816 HOF00837 RAW-Export cens ALT.png
- File:Infotafel Haus Theresienstein 20210903 HOF05045.jpg
- File:Infotafel Neubau Büro- und Laborgebäude 20220508 HOF01362 INFOTAFEL.png
- File:Infotafel Sanierung am Sana-Klinikum 20220325 HOF09660.png
- File:Infotafel Schaffung Kommunikationszentrum 20210825 HOF04573.png
- File:Infotafel Theater Hof 20201027 DSC5315.jpg
- File:Neubaugebiet Krötenhofer Weg 20230719 HOF03617 RAW-Export cens.png
- File:Rendering ZWE Hof.png
- File:Sana Klinikum Hof 20240331 HOF1193-HDR 000206.png
- File:Schema der Fachoberschule 20241130 HOF8281 RAW-Export corr crop.png
- File:Theresienstein und Umgebung am Märzsonntag 20250302 HOF4689 RAW-Export.png
- File:Waldorfkindergarten 20230422 HOF01206 RAW-Export cens.png
- File:Waldorfkindergarten 20230422 HOF01208 RAW-Export.png
_20230424_115002.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
)_20230508_HOF02052_RAW-Export_1.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
)_20230508_HOF02053_RAW-Export.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
)_20230508_HOF02055_RAW-Export.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yours sincerely, PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 13:59, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Baustelle Bismarckturm 20250429 HOF9092-HDR RAW-Export corr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
File:Vice President JD Vance Delivers Remarks at the National Catholic Prayer Breakfast (1080p 30fps H264-128kbit AAC).webm
[edit]|
|
File:Vice President JD Vance Delivers Remarks at the National Catholic Prayer Breakfast (1080p 30fps H264-128kbit AAC).webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
—Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:01, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
NRW geo data
[edit]Hi. Do you have any project page for the NRW geo data? -- DaxServer (talk) 16:25, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
- You are very careful :D
- No I just do it by myself and the upload wizard :). (But the Category:Normalisiertes Digitales Oberflächenmodell 50 (TIFF) (IT.NRW) is not completzed and one type has JP2 files and I don't know what the suitable filetype is yet) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 16:35, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
- JP2 is not yet supported Commons:File types. Maybe someday. Do you want to convert them to TIFF and upload? -- DaxServer (talk) 17:01, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, this is what I planned :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 17:02, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
- Addendum: I downloaded the whole dataset with approx 1.4 terabytes (1400 GB). The files are lossy compressed and contain Geodata, this will be recognized with converting the files into TIFF (GeoTIFF). The conversion will take a bit longer and the files a bit larger. --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 13:49, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
- That's a ton! If you're converting and uploading from your own computer, I hope you've enough computing capacity and bandwidth 🙈🙏 -- DaxServer (talk) 17:29, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
- Not the first upload project :D. I have a little workstation and we have some of the best internet connections in Germany, so this is no problem ;) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 18:15, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
- So up to 100 GB upload per day are possible when everything works as desired --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 18:16, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
- That's a ton! If you're converting and uploading from your own computer, I hope you've enough computing capacity and bandwidth 🙈🙏 -- DaxServer (talk) 17:29, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
- Addendum: I downloaded the whole dataset with approx 1.4 terabytes (1400 GB). The files are lossy compressed and contain Geodata, this will be recognized with converting the files into TIFF (GeoTIFF). The conversion will take a bit longer and the files a bit larger. --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 13:49, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, this is what I planned :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 17:02, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
- JP2 is not yet supported Commons:File types. Maybe someday. Do you want to convert them to TIFF and upload? -- DaxServer (talk) 17:01, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
ArchiveTeam US gov graphs
[edit]Hi, did you convert the tebibytes (TiB, 1024 GB) that the tracker used to terabytes?
As the binary prefix makes it about 10% larger. --Nintendofan885T&Cs apply 09:32, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
- Yes it is already converted, greetings --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 13:21, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
- I can add a binary prefix version next time if desired --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 13:44, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! JCRG – Turnhallenkomplex 20240830 HOF9387-HDR RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! JCRG – Turnhallenkomplex 20240830 HOF9394-HDR RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! JCRG – Turnhallenkomplex 20240830 HOF9399-HDR RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hotel Gut Haidt 20250427 HOF8276 RAW-Export cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hotel Gut Haidt 20250427 HOF8281 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Haidter Ortskern 20250427 HOF8317 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Gut Haidt 20250427 HOF8415 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Gut Haidt 20250427 HOF8406 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Untreusee im Frühling 20250510 HOF0215 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
 | Category:Utsource integrated circuits is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:
If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). |
Omphalographer (talk) 03:21, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Untreusee im Frühling 20250510 HOF0138 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Untreusee im Frühling 20250510 HOF0136 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
Leiter in Baugrube Eppenreuther Straße
[edit]
Hallo PantheraLeo1359531, ich bin zufällig über Deine Aufnahme einer einsamen Leiter in einer Baugrube mit einem Hauch Schnee gestolpert. Ich finde das Bild sehr stimmungsvoll, es hat eine zurückhaltende Schönheit, insbesondere durch die elegant geschwungene Linie zwischen der offenen, senkrechten Erdwand und dem schneebedeckten Aushub darunter. Und natürlich durch die Leiter ins Nichts ;–).
Ich würde Dein Bild gerne als Featured picture vorschlagen. Den Erfolg kann ich nicht garantieren, aber es ist auf jeden Fall den Versuch wert. Ich habe mich gefragt, ob ein Ausschnitt die Komposition noch mehr aufs Wesentliche reduzieren könnte, und daher das nebenstehende Derivat erstellt und hochgeladen – ich hoffe, das ist OK für Dich. Dabei fiel mir auf, dass das oben noch hereinragende winzige Stück der schwarzen Plane störte, ich habe es daher herausretuschiert (und ebenso einen einzelnen Stein, der so haarscharf am linken Rand lag, dass er zuviel Aufmerksamkeit auf sich zog). So, finde ich, kommt die etwas an ein Magritte-Bilde erinnernde Stimmung und die Eleganz von geschwungener Kante und zartem Schnee noch besser zur Geltung. Eventuell würde ich noch versuchen, den Kontrast ganz vorsichtig leicht zu erhöhen, da er jetzt im Ausschnitt (in dem die schwarze Plane ja nicht mehr vorkommt) etwas gering wirkt. Das probiere ich gleich noch.
Darf ich Dich fragen, ob Du mit einer Nominierung einverstanden wärst? Soll ich zuerst Deine komplette Aufnahme nominieren und nur wenn ein Ausschnitt gefordert wird dann meine Variante? Oder sollen wir gleich mit dem Ausschnitt starten (ich denke, die Erfolgsaussichten sind etwas höher)? Und ist es für Dich OK, dass ich die Ecke der Plane und den Stein entfernt habe, oder soll ich den unretuschierten Ausschnitt (ersten Upload) nominieren und erst bei Bedarf dann als sog. Alternative die retuschierte Version? Herzliche Grüße und alles Gute, – Aristeas (talk) 12:21, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
- Hallo lieber User:Aristeas, ich bin beeindruckt, welche Fotos Interesse erwecken und bedanke mich sehr dafür :D. Du kannst sehr gerne das zugeschnittene Foto einsenden; so liegt der Fokus mehr auf der Leiter. Schreibe bei der Nominierung gerne deinen Namen dazu :). Bin gespannt, was rauskommt :D
- Liebe Grüße --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 12:43, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
- Hallo PantheraLeo1359531, vielen Dank für Deine freundliche Antwort! Super, ich habe den Kontrast noch ein Winziges bisschen erhöht und das Bild in sRGB konvertiert (der Farbraum reicht hier gut, ich verwende auch sehr oft AdobeRGB, aber im Ausschnitt kommen gar keine Farben mehr vor, die den größeren Farbraum brauchen; und es gibt ein paar Leute auf FPC, die nur sRGB mögen ;–)). Wenn meine aktullen Nominierungen wie zu hoffen bald auslaufen, werde ich das Bild nominieren – und bin ebenfalls gespannt. Herzliche Grüße von – Aristeas (talk) 13:19, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
- Einwandfrei, das ist eine gute Idee; manchmal wirkt das Foto im Nachhinein etwas blasser, wenn man es automatisiert konvertieren lässt :D. Danke und ich bin sehr auf das Resultat gespannt! Liebe Grüße --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 14:09, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
- Danke! Hier ist die Nominierung, ich bin auch gespannt. Ein erfahrener Nominierer, der leider nicht mehr aktiv ist, hat mir mal geschrieben, FPC sei wie eine Achterbahnfahrt, man weiß nie genau, was bei einer Nominierung herauskommt. Lassen wir uns überraschen. Herzlich – Aristeas (talk) 14:43, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
- PS: Du kannst übrigens gerne für Dein/„unser“ Foto stimmen ;–). Du musst es keinesfalls mir zuliebe machen, falls Du lieber neutral bleiben willst; aber es ist ja völlig üblich, dass Fotografierende für die eigenen Bilder votieren. – Aristeas (talk) 18:28, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
- Hurra, große Freude, na dann stimme ich mal mit ab :D --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 10:51, 22 May 2025 (UTC)
- Ich habe noch den Dateinamen etwas präzisiert, damit er klarer besagt, was dieses Bild zeigt. Um den Ausschnitt mit dem Original zusammenzuhalten, habe ich dieses (in beiden Versionen, JPEG und PNG) ebenfalls analog umbenannt und alle Links aktualisiert. Deine ID-Angaben („20241215 HOF8666 RAW-Export“) habe ich natürlich unverändert belassen. Ich hoffe, das ist OK für Dich. Eigentlich hätte ich die Umbenennung schon vor der Nominierung erledigen sollen, da ein aussagekräftiger Dateiname zu den Bedingungen gehört; ich dachte erst, „Baufortschritt“ reicht, aber tatsächlich zeigen diese Bilder ja ganz konkret eine Leiter in einer Baugrube, daher denke ich, jetzt ist der Dateiname zutreffend. Herzliche Grüße, – Aristeas (talk) 08:24, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
- Klar, wie du die neue Datei nennst, ist dir völlig überlassen :D. Es stimmt, für das konkrete Bildbeispiel ist der Name nicht ganz so dolle aussagend, da ist das besonders richtig so :). Liebe Grüße! --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 18:57, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
- Ich habe noch den Dateinamen etwas präzisiert, damit er klarer besagt, was dieses Bild zeigt. Um den Ausschnitt mit dem Original zusammenzuhalten, habe ich dieses (in beiden Versionen, JPEG und PNG) ebenfalls analog umbenannt und alle Links aktualisiert. Deine ID-Angaben („20241215 HOF8666 RAW-Export“) habe ich natürlich unverändert belassen. Ich hoffe, das ist OK für Dich. Eigentlich hätte ich die Umbenennung schon vor der Nominierung erledigen sollen, da ein aussagekräftiger Dateiname zu den Bedingungen gehört; ich dachte erst, „Baufortschritt“ reicht, aber tatsächlich zeigen diese Bilder ja ganz konkret eine Leiter in einer Baugrube, daher denke ich, jetzt ist der Dateiname zutreffend. Herzliche Grüße, – Aristeas (talk) 08:24, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
- Hurra, große Freude, na dann stimme ich mal mit ab :D --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 10:51, 22 May 2025 (UTC)
- Einwandfrei, das ist eine gute Idee; manchmal wirkt das Foto im Nachhinein etwas blasser, wenn man es automatisiert konvertieren lässt :D. Danke und ich bin sehr auf das Resultat gespannt! Liebe Grüße --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 14:09, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
- Hallo PantheraLeo1359531, vielen Dank für Deine freundliche Antwort! Super, ich habe den Kontrast noch ein Winziges bisschen erhöht und das Bild in sRGB konvertiert (der Farbraum reicht hier gut, ich verwende auch sehr oft AdobeRGB, aber im Ausschnitt kommen gar keine Farben mehr vor, die den größeren Farbraum brauchen; und es gibt ein paar Leute auf FPC, die nur sRGB mögen ;–)). Wenn meine aktullen Nominierungen wie zu hoffen bald auslaufen, werde ich das Bild nominieren – und bin ebenfalls gespannt. Herzliche Grüße von – Aristeas (talk) 13:19, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
 |
The image File:Leiter in Baugrube Eppenreuther Straße 20241215 HOF8666 RAW-Export Ausschnitt bearbeitet.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Leiter in Baugrube Eppenreuther Straße 20241215 HOF8666 RAW-Export Ausschnitt bearbeitet.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page. |
|
– Aristeas (talk) 07:39, 27 May 2025 (UTC)
- Toll, da hast du mal wieder ein sehr gutes Auge gehabt, danke dir für deine große Hilfe :D --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 10:21, 27 May 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Untreusee im Frühling 20250510 HOF0218 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 22 May 2025 (UTC)
Mögliche FPC-Kandidaten
[edit]Lieber PantheraLeo,
ich wollte dich nur ganz vorsichtig fragen, ob du vielleicht Lust hast, eines oder beide der folgenden Bilder für FPC zu nominieren:
- File:Betonabfluss auf dem gefrorenen Knollenteich, Hof, 20241231 HOF0102 RAW-Export.jpg - dieses würde ich sehr gerne nominieren, wenn das für dich in Ordnung ist
- File:Winter und Nacht in Hof 20250111 HOF1097 RAW-Export.jpg - ein sehr starker Kandidat, eventuell könntest du hier (falls du möchtest) bei einem nächsten Export aus der Raw-Datei die Vertikalen leicht korrigieren, damit der Stern noch etwas gleichmäßiger wirkt?
Natürlich nur, wenn du dich damit wohlfühlst. Deine Fotos sind eine echte Bereicherung für Commons: Schön, dass du dabei bist!
Herzliche Grüße, -- Radomianin (talk) 20:22, 22 May 2025 (UTC)
- Nachtrag: Ich wollte dir nur kurz mitteilen, dass ich dein wunderbares Bild Weißes Hof und Natur an Silvester 2024 soeben für die Kandidatur als exzellentes Bild auf FPC nominiert habe - viel Erfolg! :) -- Radomianin (talk) 05:49, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
- Das sind wunderbare Nachrichten, vielen herzlichen Dank :D. Und vielen Dank für das Lob! Du kannst natürlich sehr gerne die Fotos nominieren, die Dir gefallen, die Community hat da meist ein besseres Auge als ich :). Wenn ich bisschen mehr Zeit habe, kann ich gerne mal ein neuen Ansatz des Sternfotos probieren (monentan stehen noch paar Foto-Termine an). Aber ich freue mich immer sehr, sowas zu hören :). Bei FPC sind immer so hochkarätige Motive dabei, da versuche ich mich immer bisschen zurückzuhalten. Motivierende Grüße --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 10:46, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
- Lieber PantheraLeo, vielen Dank für deine nette Rückmeldung - das freut mich wirklich sehr! Was meine Nominierung betrifft, hätte ich dich wohl besser gleich gefragt, ob du das Bild vor der Nominierung umbenennen möchtest - das war mein Fehler. Nun läuft sie bereits, aber vielleicht fällt dir ein passender, schlüssiger Titel ein, den du nach Ende der Nominierung verwenden kannst. Und falls du bei Gelegenheit noch am Stern arbeiten möchtest: das würde die Chancen auf den FP-Status sicher noch steigern. Nochmals danke für alles und entschuldige bitte den kleinen Mehraufwand! Herzliche Grüße, -- Radomianin (talk) 13:50, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
- Ja, das mit dem Namen ist ja schnell aus der Welt geschafft :). Und Mehraufwand, keineswegs! Ich freue mich ja immer über liebe Vorschläge von anderen Usern. Manchmal ist man so betriebsblind, da ist jede Idee von weiteren Kollegen sehr hilfreich😁👍 --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 14:52, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
- Vielen lieben Dank, lieber PantheraLeo - das freut mich wirklich sehr! Dann bin ich gespannt, wie die Überarbeitung des Sternbildes ausfällt. Dazu dann noch vorsorglich ein passender, beschreibender Titel im Sinne des FPC-Regelwerks und der Weg des Fotos zum FP wird aussichtsreich sein. Herzliche Grüße :) -- Radomianin (talk) 15:00, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
- Nachtrag: Bezüglich der laufenden Nominierung, möchte ich dir vorschlagen, die Datei in "Concrete drainage on the frozen Knollenteich, Hof in Bavaria, 20241231 HOF0102.jpg RAW-Export" oder auf Deutsch in "Betonabfluss auf dem gefrorenen Knollenteich, Hof, 20241231 HOF0102 RAW-Export.jpg" umzubenennen. Ich finde beide Titel sehr passend und aussagekräftig für den Bildinhalt. Die Nummern für deine Archivierung müssen natürlich bestehen bleiben. Was hältst du von diesen Vorschlägen? Wenn dir davon einer zusagt, kann ich die Umbenennung am Ende des Nominierungszeitraums gerne selbst übernehmen. Herzliche Grüße und danke für dein Feedback :) -- Radomianin (talk) 19:15, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
- Vollkommen in Ordnung ;) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 15:15, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
(talk page stalker) Hello both of you! I apologize if I came on a bit strong in this matter, but that's one way of making the rest of the FPC community pay attention. Posting polite messages on the FPC talk page will have no effect. The matter with the importance of texts came to my attention a few years ago when I was part of a trial group for the people who set up the new search system for en-wp and Commons. I learned that an overwhelmingly large part of the people who search for images for articles and other projects, never use the category system. They just type in key words in the search box and see what pops up. They don't go looking for QIs or FPs since most of them don't know what these combinations of letters stand for.
Most people are by now familiar with tags and they think Commons images are tagged in the same way. That is why poetic or sequential file names are good for photo exhibitions, but totally useless here. You need to get as many of the the words describing the image into the title or the Summary description as possible. The search tool first go for the file name, next the description and last categories. So a good description in the file name gets your photo a "high ranking" in searches. This is why you always get a bunch of useless books and documents mixed in with the photos. They consist of a lot of words.
Learning about how all this works was a real eye-opener for me. I was just as lazy as most photographers here are, and really didn't care much about the "formalities" of texts on the file pages, but now I know. As a test you can try to searching for your own photos describing them with "tag words" of what's in the picture, and see how many will turn up. I think you are both just as much nerds as I am so I thought you might find this interesting. Best, :) --Cart (talk) 12:40, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
- Dear Cart, thank you very much for taking the time to explain all of this in such detail. I truly appreciate the insights you've shared - especially regarding how file names and descriptions affect searchability and visibility across Wikimedia projects. That was very enlightening.
- Please rest assured that I am personally well aware of the importance of descriptive, precise file names. For the few photos I've uploaded myself, I've always tried to follow this principle carefully. For example, when uploading photos of ships, I've included the IMO number; and when it came to an aircraft's tail fin, I made sure to add the serial number of the plane. I fully understand the reasoning behind this approach and genuinely support it.
- This particular image by PantheraLeo really stood out to me - I found it exceptional and felt it deserved a nomination on FPC. I first noticed his images during the nomination with the ladder, as well as the one showing the pharmaceutical warehouse under construction, where we suggested a crop. In hindsight, I do realize that I should have reached out to him in advance to discuss the filename and whether it could be adjusted in preparation for the nomination. That was my oversight, and I already apologized for it on the nomination page - and I want to repeat it here.
- With third-party nominations, there's often some detail that's not quite ideal. I had some doubts, admittedly, but thought - perhaps mistakenly - that because this was part of a photo series, the filename might still be acceptable. In any case, I recognize now that I should have checked with the author first, and I will make sure to do so in the future.
- Once again, thank you for your thoughtful explanation and for helping raise awareness. For future nominations, I'll certainly be more cautious and double-check whether the title is truly descriptive enough.
- With kind regards and much appreciation, -- Radomianin (talk) 13:35, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
- Hi! I skimmed the text and I didn't feel it being strong. Of course the meaningful name of a file is important here, and due to the hint, we will pay more attention before a proper nomination :D. I am not picky at changing or finding a new file name, as the (for me) important information are on the file description and that's it😎. The FP criteria are high for a reason, and I can understand a rather general name is not always suitable for every aspect :). Greetings --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 18:56, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
- Dear PantheraLeo, thanks a lot for your kind and understanding response. I appreciate your thoughtful and constructive approach to addressing such points. To bring the file into full compliance with the FPC naming guidelines, I'd be happy to carry out the renaming process - even during the nomination. It's admittedly a bit of a meticulous task, but once you know what needs to be adjusted, it's mostly just careful editing. If you're okay with the proposed new filename – Betonabfluss auf dem gefrorenen Knollenteich, Hof, 20241231 HOF0102 RAW-Export.jpg – I can go ahead and make the change tomorrow. That way, everything will be settled and in line with the FPC rules during the ongoing nomination. Clean, consistent and no loose ends. Looking forward to your go-ahead! Kind regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 20:10, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you, if that's okay for you, I am completely fine with the name suggestion :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 15:14, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
Resolved by consensus Thank you very much for your approval, PantheraLeo! The filename, along with all related links and subpages, has already been updated accordingly. I appreciate your support :) -- Radomianin (talk) 17:25, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- You are fast, thanks for letting me know ;). Glad to have supportive people here :D --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 17:32, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you, if that's okay for you, I am completely fine with the name suggestion :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 15:14, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- Dear PantheraLeo, thanks a lot for your kind and understanding response. I appreciate your thoughtful and constructive approach to addressing such points. To bring the file into full compliance with the FPC naming guidelines, I'd be happy to carry out the renaming process - even during the nomination. It's admittedly a bit of a meticulous task, but once you know what needs to be adjusted, it's mostly just careful editing. If you're okay with the proposed new filename – Betonabfluss auf dem gefrorenen Knollenteich, Hof, 20241231 HOF0102 RAW-Export.jpg – I can go ahead and make the change tomorrow. That way, everything will be settled and in line with the FPC rules during the ongoing nomination. Clean, consistent and no loose ends. Looking forward to your go-ahead! Kind regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 20:10, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
Featured Picture Nomination
[edit]
Hello. I just wanted to let you know that the image Betonabfluss auf dem gefrorenen Knollenteich, Hof, 20241231 HOF0102 RAW-Export.jpg, which was created or uploaded by you, has been nominated for featured picture status; have a look at the nomination page. Thank you and good luck! -- Radomianin (talk) 05:49, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Drag-Show in Zur Auszeit 20250521 HOF1576 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Drag-Show in Zur Auszeit 20250521 HOF1563 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Klangmanufaktur der Hofer Symphoniker 20250521 HOF1393 RAW-Export cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Untreusee im Frühling 20250510 HOF0111 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
FP Promotion
[edit] |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Gewerbepark Hochfranken – Neubau 20250427 HOF8526 RAW-Export (cropped).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gewerbepark Hochfranken – Neubau 20250427 HOF8526 RAW-Export.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
„Featured pictures by …“-Kategorien
[edit]Hallo PantheraLeo1359531, ich danke Dir herzlich, dass Du zu Deinem Bild neben der Kategorie Featured pictures by PantheraLeo1359531 auch noch die Kategorie Featured pictures by Aristeas hinzugefügt hast. Das ist sehr nett! Aber doch zuviel der Ehre, finde ich. ;–) Auch wenn ich am Ausschnitt und am Kontrast herumgepfuscht habe, bleibt es doch Dein Foto. Ich tue schon genug für meine Eitelkeit, indem ich das Bild gleich zu zwei Listen hinzugefügt habe: User:Aristeas/Galleries/Improved images und User:Aristeas/Galleries/FPs nominated by me. Das reicht dann aber auch ;–). Die Kategorie Featured pictures by Aristeas sollte ich nur für diejenigen Bilder verwende, die ich selbst verbrochen habe. Daher habe ich mir erlaubt, diese Kategorie wieder von Deinem Foto zu entfernen. Das nicht als Kritik, absolut nicht, sondern nur als Erklärung. Herzliche Grüße und alles Gute, – Aristeas (talk) 09:04, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
- Okay, danke dir für den Hinweis :D. Ich hatte gedacht, da du ja maßgeblich am Erfolg beteiligt warst, wäre das angemessen. Aber so ist das natürlich noch besser😁. Ich bin auf jeden Fall sehr gespannt, was noch an Fotos kommt und freue mich schon auf weitere Kunstwerke von dir ;). Liebe Grüße --09:46, 30 May 2025 (UTC) PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 09:46, 30 May 2025 (UTC)