Jump to content

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Cameron Rowland in front of audience at Columbia GSAPP.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{speedydelete| Subject of the photo has requested this photo to be removed and did not directly consent for the photo to be published.}} GSAPPstudent (talk) 16:18, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: There is no rule on Commons that stipulates people must consent to photographs of themselves taken in public. If you uploaded this work to Commons and it is indeed your own work, you have released it under an irrevocable free license. Unless you were breaking local laws by making this photograph, I don't see a clear reason to delete it. Per the website for the event this photograph was made at, the event was free and open to the public. Rowland, by agreeing to attend this public event, could not reasonably assume privacy, and their permission is not required to publish this image. I welcome other insights, but I don't think this photo should be deleted under the justification that the person in the image was entitled to privacy at a free public event. (Identical rationale/situation as the separate deletion request for File:Cameron Rowland giving a lecture at Columbia GSAPP.jpg) 19h00s (talk) 01:15, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: The subject was speaking in a public place open to the US. Will add personality rights to file. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:00, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Removing speedy delete request made by GSAPPstudent, re-listing as normal deletion request. This image was kept after a deletion request that was closed within the past week. Subject does not need to consent to this photograph being published as it was made at a free, public event. See documentation in previous deletion request (above). Image has been released under an irrevocable free license by the uploader, if it is indeed their own work. --19h00s (talk) 21:01, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ankry (talk) 13:49, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

request of Cameron Rowland 66.108.48.178 15:50, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Once again (for the umpteenth time), Rowland and/or Columbia are welcome to present evidence to VRT that photography was not allowed at the event. Otherwise, there is no reason to delete this or the other similar photographs made and uploaded by GSAPPstudent. 19h00s (talk) 15:57, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 14:39, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]