User talk:4nn1l2

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Прошу прощения[edit]

Здравствуйте, дело в том что я не разобрался с некоторыми файлами и правилами авторского права, по этому допустил ошибки, повторного подобного не будет. Iliya Kushkin Official (talk) 16:28, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Okay, thanks for discontinuing. 4nn1l2 (talk) 16:32, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

4nn1l2, я немножко не понимаю, за что мне дали бан или что, на странице жалобы и как его снять? Iliya Kushkin Official (talk) 16:34, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

You have not been banned. You have only been warned. You may continue contributing to the project, but only with your own photos (photos taken by yourself), not those taken from the web. 4nn1l2 (talk) 16:37, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
4nn1l2, other uploads (Special:ListFiles/Iliya_Kushkin_Official) are not own works as well, see [1]. --188.123.231.58 16:39, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted some others speedily. Not sure about the rest of them. One can nominate them for deletion or tag for speedy deletion if eligible. 4nn1l2 (talk) 17:05, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
    • Так я за них и так получил предупреждение, выставьте на удаление и всё. Iliya Kushkin Official (talk) 16:44, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
    • 4nn1l2 то есть я не могу загружать фотографии с лицензией даже в свободном доступе вообще? Или мне вот нужна фотографии, что бы использовать её в статью, как мне проверить могу ли это сделать, если сайт с которого я это брал, показывает в низу своём только (c) и всё, что я должен делать? Iliya Kushkin Official (talk) 16:55, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
      You can upload freely-licensed files and those in the public domain, but you should provide their source and determine the license properly. Please read COM:L/ru before uploading any other files. 4nn1l2 (talk) 17:05, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
    • Спасибо. Думаю я следующий раз разберусь. Iliya Kushkin Official (talk) 06:22, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

حذف تصاویر دارای کیفیت‌پایین[edit]

درود لطفا اول این رده‌را یک نگاه بیندازید؛ بنده تصاویری باکیفیت و هم بی‌کیفیت ارائه‌دادم و ترجیح‌میدم تصاویر بی‌کیفیت حذف‌شوند اما نمی‌دانم چطور میشه این‌کارو کرد! آیا می‌توانید راهنماییم‌کنید؟ تصاویر در تاریخ 2021-06-08 ضعیف اما 2021-07-18 بهتر هستند. POS78 (talk) 17:57, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

سلام. دسترسی گشت خودکار (autopatrol) بهتان دادم. الان باید بتوانید در ترجیحات Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-gadgets گزینهٔ VisualFileChange را فعال کنید. بعد به ردهٔ مورد نظر بروید و برای آن تصویرهایی که بی‌کیفیت می‌دانید درخواست حذف گروهی بدهید. یک هفته صبر کنید اگر کسی مخالفت نکرد یادآوری کنید تا حذفشان کنم. 4nn1l2 (talk) 18:14, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
جسارتا میشه بیشتر در مورد درخواست حذف گروهی توضیح دهید؟ تشکر POS78 (talk) 18:42, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
پس از فعال کردن ابزار به ردهٔ مورد نظر بروید، از نوار کناری گزینهٔ Perform batch task را انتخاب کنید. سپس دکمهٔ proceed را بزنید. سپس از قسمت action در بالای صفحه nominate for deletion را انتخاب کنید. دلیل حذف (بی‌کیفیت بودن و وجود جایگزین) را در جعبهٔ زیرش بنویسید و آن تصاویری که می‌خواهید حذف شوند را تیک بزنید. در نهایت روی دکمهٔ execute بزنید. 4nn1l2 (talk) 18:54, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
انجام‌شد. ممنونم :) POS78 (talk) 19:10, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

جسارتا می‌توانید مقاله زنده جان] در ویکی‌انگیسی را بررسی کنید؟ بنظرم فتوکلاژ نیاز ندارد ولی صدر تصاویر قلعه بزنجرد مربوط به‌شهرستان خلیل‌آباد، دو تصویر که‌درخواست حذف آن‌هارا دادم، گورستان و یک درب معمولی به‌صورت فتوکلاژ! این تصویر کفایت می‌کند. سپاس‌گذارم POS78 (talk) 20:00, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

✓ شد 4nn1l2 (talk) 20:09, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

Revdel request[edit]

Hi again, per the outcome of this DR, can you please revdel my uploads of the file in question? Many thanks, ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) 11:21, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done 4nn1l2 (talk) 23:38, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Quick question[edit]

This two images ([2][3]) are from the Seeiran.ir website which has "انتشار مطالب با ذکر منبع بلامانع است" at the bottom, so can we keep it? If yes, just answer shortly, if no, delete it. --Orijentolog (talk) 12:28, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

✓ Deleted. That short statement is ambiguous and unacceptable. It does not say anything about 1) derivative works; 2) commercial use. 4nn1l2 (talk) 00:11, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

No FoP in Iran[edit]

Hi, 4nn1l2, and thanks for your help, but since lack of FoP in Iran wasn't given as a deletion reason at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tabriz Terminal.jpg, I figured the deletion request would fail and didn't download the photo to use locally in en.Wikipedia/Tabriz, based on en.Wikivoyage's fair-use exception rules, thereby leaving a hole in the article. Would it have been possible to give us a little notice before deleting the file, since the deletion reason was not mentioned by anyone in the thread? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:02, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi, you're welcome.
The DR was more than one month old and could be closed. Copyright rules trump consensus at DRs. Anyway, I undeleted the file temporarily, so that it can be transferred to other projects. I will delete it again 48 hours later. Thanks 4nn1l2 (talk) 11:15, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
Super! Thank you very much. And that was long enough for one of my colleagues to upload it locally. Of course I understand that copyright rules trump consensus; I wouldn't have asked you not to delete the file from Commons. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:51, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

GFDL in fa.wiki[edit]

Thank you for raising the issue at fawiki. I hope the ban of GFDL will be accepted. It seems many of the latest GFDL-only files are possible copyvios. --MGA73 (talk) 20:35, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

@MGA73: Fawiki has a strange rule that it has no policies or guidelines of its own and instead follows the English Wikipedia, so in absence of any explicit consensus to reject the English Wikipedia's consensus, fawiki follows enwiki regarding the new GFDL policy.
I reviewed the files in the list, fixed many of them, tagged some of them for speedy deletion (which may take months to be resolved there, considering that most of its admins know almost nothing about copyright), and nominated some others for regular deletion. I also asked three users to relicense their works under CC, two of which responded positively very quickly!
I think I'm done here. 4nn1l2 (talk) 08:59, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
Thank you. That is super fast response! If there are any other wikis where you understand the language you are very welcome to have a look at them too.:-)
Do you know anyone on fa.wiki that could work on the license migration? On fa:کاربر:MGA73/Status I made a link so it is possible to see who uploaded the license migration candidates. Active users could relicense their files but many have to be fixed by someone who volunteer to help out. I do not have a bot flag on fa.wiki and right-to-left is not easy for me. --MGA73 (talk) 09:25, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
@MGA73: In my early days as a Wikipedian, I was patrolling all images of fawiki and I really intended to sort things out, but some ignorant admin bited me, declined my speedy tags, ... and the ensuing drama left a bad taste in my mouth. Since then I have tried hard to avoid any activities regarding images on that project. Today, I almost made an exception following your comment.
Why did I say this? I saw this question of yours on fa:کاربر:MGA73/Status: "It seems that license migration is not implemented. Why?" There is a bigger problem. Today, Fawiki is a haven for all kinds of copyvios.
I can't (or don't want to) name anyone, but I may be able to do the task myself.
But I have a question about dual-licensing images. Commons:License Migration Task Force/Migration states that "Must have been uploaded to Commons or to some other Wikimedia project before August 1, 2009." It means that, for example, fa:پرونده:Golfam.JPG — which has been uploaded to fawiki in 2011 — is not eligible to be dual-licensed under CC by me (a third party). Is this correct? 4nn1l2 (talk) 12:26, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
Copyvios have to be checked one by one so that takes a lot of time. And I do not read the language so I need to use google translate. That is why I focused on GFDL first. It sux when you try to clean up and you are turned down. But I think it is important to keep trying. I talked to Huji ‎and it seems that Huji ‎want to get things fixed too. See fa:بحث_کاربر:Huji#Files. I try to find files without a license first. But I need a little help updating the license templates.
You are correct that fa:پرونده:Golfam.JPG can't be relicensed. Except by the uploader. What makes it a bit tricky is that if a file is uploaded in 2008 and cropped in 2010 then the file is still eligible for relicense but if you make list of files uploaded before August 2009 then it may not be on the list. Depending on how you make the list. --MGA73 (talk) 13:01, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
I try to fix things using queries from database and Javascript. but I need some time. 4nn1l2 (talk) 17:35, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

LicenseReview[edit]

Hello again, can you please review the CC BY 4.0 licence for Enda Kenny (2012).jpg? Many thanks, ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) 06:06, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done 4nn1l2 (talk) 06:14, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

Re[edit]

  • [4]: "boohoo cry me a river" "useless admins"; apparently officially considered civil.
  • [5]: Editing other people's comments in an issue they're involved in.

Meanwhile, I've been revdeled or summary-deleted twice for the vicious crime of using bad words oh no scary wavy hands aaaaaaah

Maybe I wouldn't be so over you people if y'all had treated everyone equally instead of acting like 3rd graders and screaming ooooOOOOOOOO at someone saying the forbidden words scary

The children here have nothing more to worry from me. --Golbez (talk) 02:13, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

I just can't believe someone loses their admin bit per inactivity policy, then asks the 'crats to make an exception for him, when refused starts to say "f*** off", "go f*** yourself", "sh**", "b**ch", and finally call the editors here children multiple times asking them to grow the "f***" up. It's not just a matter of civility, but also attacking users.
No Golbez, you act wisely and calmly, and the problem is magically solved. No need for us to lower ourselves to such low levels of behaviour and getting used to crude language. 4nn1l2 (talk) 06:19, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
I didn't ask for anything. I believe my exact words were "I'd rather you didn't". And when it was done, I responded appropriately, pointing out how bad the policy was. Then I was met with rudeness and insults. I responded in kind. One of us got sanctioned; the other did not. You've made your choice, so have I. There is no problem to solve except the childish attitude that saying "fuck" is worse than everything else that was said. So, continue being children. Good day. --Golbez (talk) 14:18, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
I couldn't care less about the word f*** itself (not aiming it towards others), but I find calling male editors b**ch utterly insulting (calling female editors b**ch is also insulting but at least it does not mess with their gender). This is definitely a personal attack and you're lucky you didn't get blocked over it. In my opinion, you crossed certain red lines and you are responsible for your own behavior, no matter how much you have been taunted. The other party had already been told twice[6][7] to discontinue and defuse the situation and they were doing so, but you were doubling down. At last, don't forget here is an international community and you can't take it for granted that all people around the world be okay with profanities. 4nn1l2 (talk) 14:47, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
I never said I'm not responsible for my own behavior, I simply stand by it. --Golbez (talk) 18:59, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

Bot[edit]

Hi 4nn1l2, Hope all is well, I don't entirely know if this'll work but if the Maintenance bot is doing your head in you can add {{bots|deny=CommonsMaintenanceBot}} to your talkpage which hopefully should stop any further messages from this specific bot :), Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 11:51, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done Hi Davey2010, useful tip. Thanks 4nn1l2 (talk) 12:00, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Hey 4nn1l2, You're welcome :), Happy editing, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 12:02, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

LicenseReview 2[edit]

Hi, can you please review the CC BY 4.0 licence for Peter Sutherland (1985).jpg? Thanks again, ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) 12:12, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done 4nn1l2 (talk) 12:14, 18 August 2021 (UTC)


File:Mitsumori.jpg[edit]


File:Mitsumori.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion. A reason for the tagging has not been detected or none was placed.

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Gameposo.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 04:12, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Request your opinion at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Shahrozunar95[edit]

Hi 4nn1l2,

This looks like the same kind of abusive deletion requests Rohalamin engaged in, but this time, it's from an admin. You're a fair-minded admin who doesn't believe that mere file size is evidence of copyvio. Please look at this set of deletion requests and give your opinion about it when you have a chance, and thanks!

All the best,

Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:39, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

Nevermind, A.Savin found one of the images in a larger size on Facebook. So the deletion nominations are justified, but I still don't like mere size and absence of EXIF as argued by EugeneZelenko as deletion reasons. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:48, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Translation completed[edit]

Hello! 4nn1l2 This page ꯃꯔꯨꯑꯣꯏꯕ ꯂꯃꯥꯏ is a preparation for mni language (Meitei language/Manipuri language) started by someone, but I completed it. Can it be linked to the general main page for Commons?

Another thing, if I want to translate a new page (not file) of Commons like others are translating into their respective languages, what shall I do? Any steps or permission (if any), please tell me. Haoreima (talk) 12:46, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Hello Haoreima, done.
Regarding translations, if a page has already marked for translation such as Commons:Licensing, you can simply click on the "translate this page" link and start translating it into Meitei/Manipuri language. But this is the new method. Many pages on Commons still use the old method and have not been marked for translation such as Commons:Community portal. In this case, you can put the name of the page in the search box, press Enter, click on the red link that appears, and finally create the page. It's like creating any other page on a wiki. Then the translated page should be manually added to respective English page via Template:Lang-CP, in this case. 4nn1l2 (talk) 16:21, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

LicenseReview 3[edit]

Hello again, can you please review the OGL3 licence for Charles-Anthony-Raven-Crosland.jpg? Thanks, ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) 14:00, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

Hello Neveselbert (mobile), ✓ Done, but I did not understand why this file would need a license review. It's a governmental work and I think the British government is more trustworthy regarding copyright than Wikimedia Commons or the entire WMF which is a charity. Is there something that I may have overlooked? 4nn1l2 (talk) 15:36, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
Face-smile.svg Thank you. I'm just erring on the side of the caution, since the National Portrait Gallery tends to claim their own copyright on all the works they currently hold. This is the first exception I've encountered, so I think it's worth noting. ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) 16:47, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

What's wrong with that?[edit]

Hi Admin, File:Mersi.webm I took the picture of hand myself.--Roozitaa (talk) 01:37, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

@Roozitaa: سلام. از سال ۲۰۱۸ ویکی‌انبار دیگر پروانه GFDL را به تنهایی نمی‌پذیرد و شما باید پروانهٔ دیگری انتخاب کنید. برای اصلاح این فایل هم کافی است به حالت ویرایش بروید و GFDL را پاک کنید و مجوز دیگری به جایش بنویسید، مثلاً {{CC BY-SA 4.0}}. برچسب قرمزرنگ هشدار را هم خودتان می‌توانید بردارید. 4nn1l2 (talk) 14:54, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

Вікі любить пам'ятки 2021 в Україні / Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 in Ukraine[edit]

WLM2021UA-invitation.png

Привіт!

З 1 по 30 вересня вже традиційно пройде українська частина міжнародного фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить пам'ятки»! В Україні цей конкурс пройде вже вдесяте. На конкурс можна подавати власні фото пам'яток історико-культурної спадщини України — і змагатися за призи. Більше можна прочитати за посиланням.

Радимо ознайомитися із детальними правилами, а також із відповідями на часті питання. Як і того року — у номінації «За найбільшу кількість сфотографованих пам’яток» можна отримати 21 бал за фотографії об'єктів, якщо світлин цієї пам'ятки раніше не було завантажено.

Нагадаємо, що всі фотографії автоматично беруть участь у номінації «За найбільшу кількість сфотографованих пам’яток»; однак для того, щоб фото позмагалося у номінації «Найкраще фото», потрібно підтвердити це при завантаженні.

Цього року вперше будуть окремо виділені фото з повітря (дронами, квадрокоптерами тощо) — у спеціальній номінації «Аерофото». Для того, щоб робота потрапила на спецномінацію потрібно вибрати її у Завантажувачі.

Також вперше проводиться спеціальна номінація «Пам'ятки Подесення», знову пройдуть спецномінації «Відео», «Єврейська спадщина», «Млини», «Пам'ятки національно-визвольної боротьби» та «Via Regia Ukraine». Для участі світлин у цих спецномінаціях не потрібно обирати нічого у Завантажувачі — світлини зараховуватимуться автоматично з відповідних списків.

Усі номінації та спецномінації конкурсу описані тут.

Приєднуйтеся!

Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут. Більше інформації про конкурс дивіться за посиланням. Щоб отримувати інформацію про новинки у конкурсі — підпишіться на наші блог та сторінку у фейсбук.

Важливо! Цього року відбулася адміністративно-територіальна реформа. Однак, ми проводимо конкурс ще за попереднім адміністративно-територіальним устроєм. Ми почали роботу над створенням списків з новим поділом, але вона ще не є завершена. Ви можете користуватися тими новими списками, що вже є, якщо потрібно відшукати пам'ятку за новим поділом (деякі ОДА вже почали присилати у такому форматі), але пам'ятайте, що нові списки ще не є повними.

Якщо у Вас є запитання, можете звертатися wlm@wikimedia.org.ua чи у фейсбук – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки».17:26, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Ви отримали це повідомлення, оскільки Ви брали участь в одному із фотоконкурсів «Вікімедіа Україна» чи допомагали (наприклад, редагували файли з цих конкурсів).

If you do not speak Ukrainian, but you are interested in a contest, you can check out our page in English here.

Template:Abna[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Template:Abna has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eyesnore (talk) 12:47, 2 September 2021 (UTC)