User talk:AngMoKio
Archive 1 [June 2006 till July 2007]
Archive 2 [August 2007 till April 2008]
Archive 3 [May 2008 till December 2008]
Archive 4 [January 2009 till April 2009]
Archive 5 [April 2009 till February 2010]
Archive 6 [February 2010 till September 2010]
If you want to contact me via eMail and you don't want to create an account, you can contact me at 
.
If you write messages to me on my talk page, I will also always reply them here on my talk page.
![60 Using your picture "Haekkinen 2007 amk.jpg"](#Using_your_picture_"Haekkinen_2007_amk.jpg"){kind=link}
Photo Greyhound racing - Thank you[edit]
I used one of your fotos in an little art project. I used this one:
Čeština: Závodící anglický chrt English: Greyhound racing Français : Lévrier durant une course. Date 18 May 2008 Source Own work Author AngMoKio Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license
Thank you for your very good foto.
You find my art project on youtube. It´s named: fast and simple - nur drei Tasten
Best regards Hilmar Bieling Hilmar2001@web.de —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2A02:8108:9640:1ED4:9163:1E6B:F591:C453 (talk) 12:43, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Photo[edit]
I would like to thank you for your generosity in allowing me to use your photo of the CKS Memorial Hall. I would like to make a short video with it.
KEB auf DE[edit]
Hallo AngMoKio!
DWiW hat ein Bild von dir bei KEB nominiert. Mich würden die Aufnahmeinformationen interessieren, hast Du hiervon noch die EXIF da und könntest sie vielleicht nachtragen? :-) Grüße, Grand-Duc (talk) 09:32, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
- Hi Grand-Duc, habe die EXIFs nachgetragen. Danke für den Hinweis. --AngMoKio (座谈) 14:32, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
bad tone[edit]
May I please give it another thought before ever again saying "I seriously doubt that the right turtle was on the original pic". I consider this to be a personal attack.--Mbz1 (talk) 00:28, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- You added the left turtle (without mentioning it) - how could I ever get the thought that the right turtle might also be cloned-in?! And to only doubt that everything is right about the photo is a personal attack. Ahm yeah, right... --AngMoKio (座谈) 01:13, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- I saw your request about uploading the image with my relatives pixeled out. I will not do it. To pixel people out of the picture is a bad omen. I could only add that I was able, and did took the separate images of both turtles from the same place. I did mention manual cloning, and did not specify what exactly was cloned only because I did not believe it was such a big deal, and because I am lazy in writing good descriptions. It definitely not deserved a reaction I've got from you, and the accusation of the right turtle cloned too was beyond ridiculous and a great example of assumption of a bad faith. Both turtles were basking on the rocks in a very close proximity to each other. Turtles are not good in walking the beach. If they need to bask, they bask at the ocean's edge. I brought the other turtle to the panorama not because I believed the image has a better chances on FP, but only because I wanted to show an atmosphere of the beach as I saw it with the turtles basking on the rocks. There was one more turtle in tidepool nearby. I had an idea adding her too, but it was way too much work to do it. Oh boy,I'm so glad I did not add that turtle. Regards.--Mbz1 (talk) 18:14, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
- Aha bad omen...no other reason? Well, others have eyes too and I really don't want a fight with you.
To upload a faked picture is sth which in my opinion might be ok for flickr, but for sure not for commons. And here it doesn't matter how far this left turtle actually was away and imho it also doesn't matter for which intention you faked it. That's my very personal way of thinking. And you saw on your nomination that others have similar thoughts.
And the assumption that the right turtle might also be cloned in is "beyond ridiculous"?! Well the left one was fake and this assumption is "beyond ridiculous" - you must be kidding.
Anyway for me the matter is closed. We both stated our opinions. Peace! --AngMoKio (座谈) 22:44, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
- Aha bad omen...no other reason? Well, others have eyes too and I really don't want a fight with you.
- I saw your request about uploading the image with my relatives pixeled out. I will not do it. To pixel people out of the picture is a bad omen. I could only add that I was able, and did took the separate images of both turtles from the same place. I did mention manual cloning, and did not specify what exactly was cloned only because I did not believe it was such a big deal, and because I am lazy in writing good descriptions. It definitely not deserved a reaction I've got from you, and the accusation of the right turtle cloned too was beyond ridiculous and a great example of assumption of a bad faith. Both turtles were basking on the rocks in a very close proximity to each other. Turtles are not good in walking the beach. If they need to bask, they bask at the ocean's edge. I brought the other turtle to the panorama not because I believed the image has a better chances on FP, but only because I wanted to show an atmosphere of the beach as I saw it with the turtles basking on the rocks. There was one more turtle in tidepool nearby. I had an idea adding her too, but it was way too much work to do it. Oh boy,I'm so glad I did not add that turtle. Regards.--Mbz1 (talk) 18:14, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chiang Kai-shek Cultural Center Library amk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.  Support Great picture!--Murdockcrc 12:46, 4 January 2011 (UTC) |
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Greyhound Racing amk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Impressive. --Cayambe 18:25, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Greyhound Racing 2 amk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. dynamic view --Mbdortmund 19:13, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
|
This is a lovely image! I'd very much like to link to it in an article for our front page, here...http://preferredwriters.enjin.com/ Thank you, Laurie Tysinger (Admin, preferredwriters.enjin.com) Greetings, this picture is impressive! I am using it on my article on dog gaits, found here and attributing it to you. http://alexadry.hubpages.com/hub/A-Guide-to-Understanding-Dog-Gait Thank you!
Linse[edit]
Hi,
irgendwie raffe ich diese komischen QI-Vorlagen nicht. Wenn ich dir dort antworte dann zerschieße ich die ganze Box. Deswegen hier die Antwort auf deine Frage zum Montreal-Stadtpanorama. Ich habe das Bild mit diesem Objektiv abgelichtet. Viele Grüsse --Wladyslaw (talk) 15:57, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
P.S. Wegen den unscharfen (Rand)bereichen. Das ist ein mir bekanntes Problem, was mich öfter nervt. Ich bin mir aber nicht sicher, ob es an der Linse selbst liegt oder eventuell am Fokus der Kamera. Denn ich habe das Problem nicht immer und es tritt auch nicht zwingend immer am Rand auf. --Wladyslaw (talk) 15:59, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
- Hi, hast du dir schon mal den Test auf Photozone angeschaut? (die finde ich immer ganz gut) Da werden auch die Probleme im Rand-Bereich etwas angemosert. Dort kannst du auch sehen, bei welchen Blenden sich die Linse optimal verhält, danach versuche ich mich (wenn möglich) bei meinen "Problem-Linsen" immer grob zu richten. Gruß --AngMoKio (座谈) 16:10, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall 2009 2 amk.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality in difficult light situation --Mbdortmund 00:17, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
|
FP Promotion[edit]
|
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Greyhound Racing 2 amk.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Greyhound Racing 2 amk.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 11:57, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Opernhaus Stuttgart amk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support Nice colours, but why can't people mind the "Parkverbot".. --ElHeineken 11:50, 15 January 2011 (UTC) |
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kaiseradler Aquila heliaca e amk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Nice shot! --Makele-90 23:33, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Vatican StPaul Statue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. No question: QI --Berthold Werner 18:36, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Figure Longshan Temple amk.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. very good composition but I would prefer an exposure with a bit more contrast --Mbdortmund 00:35, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
any better? --AngMoKio 12:42, 15 January 2011 (UTC) Yes --Mbdortmund 01:16, 16 January 2011 (UTC) |
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Gate e amk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. I like it --Carschten 17:03, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chang Chun Shrine amk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. ok --Carschten 18:06, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Formel3 racing car 2 amk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good.--Ankara 13:04, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mercedes-Benz SLS amk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Dark parts looks a bit noisy, but still good. --Berthold Werner 18:17, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
|
Greetings from Changi[edit]
--203.117.16.194 05:58, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for Picture[edit]
I want to save Twain temple ceiling for meditation focus, but having trouble saving into my gallery. —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2600:1010:B15C:ADE2:7B82:9B95:944:7330 (talk) 11:08, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
I am using the picture of Singapore on a news item about energy efficiency and saving in Asia - it is a great shot.
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sri Mariamman Temple Singapore 2 amk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Very nice and well done --Jebulon 16:01, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sri Mariamman Temple Singapore 3 amk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Yes !!!--Jebulon 15:58, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sri Mariamman Temple Singapore amk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Very good (and interesting). Could be better categorized IMO --Jebulon 15:59, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Peter Kraus 4 2010 amk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality, overexposured shirt acceptable because of the light situation. --Mbdortmund 15:24, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
|
FP Promotion[edit]
|
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Sri Mariamman Temple Singapore 3 amk.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sri Mariamman Temple Singapore 3 amk.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 06:00, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
New York Pic[edit]
Hi, I'm using this picture on my Book Drum page to illustrate the city. Thanks..
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Great Buddha Changhua 2 amk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good -- George Chernilevsky 15:24, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Great Buddha Changhua amk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Very good -- George Chernilevsky 15:25, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Fernsehturm Stuttgart amk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 07:39, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Taipei 101 view from below amk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 07:39, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Changhua Great Buddha Temple amk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Cayambe 19:36, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sri Veerama Kaliamman Temple amk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. ok --Carschten 16:05, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! View from Taipei101 amk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 15:09, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mercedes-Benz C 111 3 amk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Ok. I want one! --Ankara 12:51, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Gate 2009 amk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. QI --Coyau 23:40, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Prohibition sign Taipei amk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Ok to me. --Cayambe 18:37, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! St Peters Basilica Statues amk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Mbdortmund 00:07, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Trevi Fountain detail amk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Mbdortmund 00:07, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Still life fleamarket amk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Very good !--Jebulon 23:40, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Fisherman's Bastion Budapest amk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 19:54, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mercedes CLK DTM C209 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Mbdortmund 15:32, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mercedes-benz star amk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Mbdortmund 15:31, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
|
FP Promotion[edit]
|
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Still life fleamarket amk.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Still life fleamarket amk.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Peter Kraus 2010 amk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Saffron Blaze 11:11, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! HelgeSchneider 2009 2 amk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 14:36, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! HelgeSchneider 2009 4 amk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 14:36, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bernd Schneider Norbert Haug Dieter Zetsche 2008 amk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 14:36, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
|
Image Paulus statue[edit]
Hi, we'd like to use your picture of the Paulus statue in Rome on a poster announcing a amateur choir concert (Mendelssohns "Paulus"). Hope you agree. Please write, how to cite you. Thanks, Chris. --Chrisgl
- Hi there, thanks a lot for your request. You can use the photo, but please anyway send me a mail to angmokio/at/gmx/dot/de. Thanks. --AngMoKio (座谈) 09:36, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
Krishna[edit]
Hello,
I have proposed your image as valued image for Krishna. Best regards, Yann (talk) 06:41, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
- Hey thanks. That's my first image that gets proposed there. Somehow I didnt start yet to put my photos there. Btw so far this photo isn't really used in articles, so if you want you can put it into articles. I don't have that much knowledge about that topic and don't really know how it can get used in articles. --AngMoKio (座谈) 08:07, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
Permission to publish picture of St. Paul[edit]
Dear Friend,
I am one of 4 authors currently working on an academic book on the history of concepts about nerve function, soon to be published by a university press in the US. In a chapter dedicated to the state of knowledge on the subject in the early Christian period, the role of St Paul is mentioned, and we would like to insert at that point a picture of the marble statue exhibited in front of St. Peters Basilica (Vatican).
The purpose of this message is to ask for your permission to use your superb picture of that piece (300 dots per inch minimum resolution, in JPEG or other common image format), as well as your name and other data that you might wish to appear in the figure legend on the printed page of the above mentioned scholarly publication.
Thank you very much in advance for your kind reply to this inquiry.
Sincerely,
Dr. Eugenio Frixione
你好, 請問你結婚了嗎? 小壞手
李平[edit]
你的漢語很好... 我是李平, 你還記得我嗎?
- 谢谢你. 我记得你. 你好吗? :-)
Using your photo of Shree Krishna.[edit]
|
Using your photo of Shree Krishna. |
| Hey i used your photo of Lord Krishna in the wiki-article Krishna. Jagadhatri (talk) 09:51, 28 December 2011 (UTC) |
File:Chiang Kai-shek memorial 2 amk.jpg[edit]
Hallo AngMoKio
Wirklich gutes Bild, speziell wenn man weiss, dass für eine solche Ansicht vor dem Tor nicht viel Platz ist.
Die Kameroposition ist aber leider falsch und die Blickrichtung fehlt.
Meiner Meinung nach gehört die richtige Positionierung und die Blickrichtung dazu (in der Gegend Deiner Photographie gibts einige Beispiele von mir dafür).
Ich weiss, dass die Fotos an der Street Map hängen, und dass diese mit den Satellitenbildern zum Teil schlecht zusammenpassen.
Aber, wenn man in Wikimedia aktiv sein will, dann muss das auch in dieser Hinsicht perfekt sein. Ich meinerseits habe 2011 meine 940 Bilder über Taiwan 2010 durchgegangen und auf richtige Positionierung geprüft. Im Moment bin ich im Endspurt, aber einige fehlen noch, weil sie nicht angezeigt werden.
Übrigens: Sollten Bilder von Dir nicht in der Liste auftauchen, denn schieb die Karte einfach herum, bei grossen Clustern ist das Tool immer noch nicht fähig, alle anzuzeigen. Ich habe das schon mal angemerkt und es wurde auch verbessert, aber es ist immer noch nicht genug.
Eine Korrektur der Position kann übrigens 10 Minuten oder manchmal sogar Tage oder Wochen brauchen.
Herzliche Grüsse und alles Gute im Neuen Jahr. -- Lord Koxinga (talk) 20:09, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
- Hallo
Danke für das Lob. Wieso denkst du, dass die Kameraposition nicht stimmt? Ich habe zugegebenermaßen die Position aus google maps geholt, aber die sollte doch eigentlich stimmen. Ich habe das Bild leider nicht ganz zentriert gemacht, da ich wohl etwas links der Mitte stand. Das mit den Ausrichtungen muss ich mir noch anschauen. Damit habe ich bisher nichts gemacht. --AngMoKio (座谈) 22:40, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
- Hallo
- Hallo AngMoKio
Man sieht durch den mittleren Torbogen von der linken Seite des Memorials mehr als von der rechten. Die Kameraposition ist meiner Meinung nach ungefähr 4 Meter südlich (und dann wahrscheinlich auch 2 Meter westlich).
Man muss allerdings wissen, dass die Kamerapositionen an die Street Map gekoppelt sind. Diese passt manchmal nicht gut auf das Satellitenbild. Da gibt's nichts anderes, als von Zeit zu Zeit nachzuschauen. In Taipei ist das aber schon recht gut.
Die Blickrichtung (Heading) beträgt meiner Meinung nach etwa 110. Über die minimale Schrittweite bin ich mir da noch nicht im Klaren (5,10,90/8,90/16 oder vielleicht sogar 1 Grad?).
Ich lasse Dir per e-mail noch ein Excel-Tool zukommen, das ich schon seit Jahren für Position, Text und Kategorien brauche. So kann ich alles in Ruhe vorbereiten und dann zuerst das Bild und dann in einem zweiten Schritt den ganzen Rest hinaufladen. Bräuchte natürlich ein paar Anpassungen (User, Lizenz, Eintrag QualityImage bei den Kategorien, Sprachen).
Herzliche Grüsse -- Lord Koxinga (talk) 10:53, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
- Hallo AngMoKio
taipei 101[edit]
Hi, AngMoKio: I'm wondering if I can use the picture of Taipei 101 2009 amk.jpg . I use it as a history exhibition in a small libraray of a company. With no charge, just for a free exhibition. Is that ok for you? I'll be very appriciately!! thanks! Novia Yeh
借用圖片[edit]
哈囉,AngMoKio: 我們是來自台灣的學生，想向你借用幾張相片 1).Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Gate 2 e amk.jpg 2).Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall 2009 2 amk.JPG 3).Taipei 101 2009 amk.jpg
預計做為參加比賽的圖片，不知你是否願意出借? 如果你願意出借，我們會非常非常的感激有這麼好的圖片可以使用，謝謝。
Kellsy 2012.04.08
Permission to use photo[edit]
Hi, AngMoKio I'm writing an article about women in motorsports and mentions Susie Wolff several times. It will be used on a non-profit site which we students use to learn the basics in journalism. Would it be possible to use the picture called "DTM Mercedes 2007 Stoddart amk.jpg"?
Using your photo outside Wikiworld[edit]
Hello--I posted your photo of a yellow Lamborghini to my photo collection on Pinterest, which is shared with others. I credited you with the phot by your username AngMoKio and the license link. If this is not OK with you, please let me know and I will remove it.
Thanks for sharing your vision! Rhondalark
[edit]
Your interesting photo of Taipei street art featuring Audrey Hepburn, @ [[1]] , was shared by me on Pinterest with all due attribution and CC notice. You can view it at Pinterest>Blue Gryphon>Inspired Designs & Eye Candy Thanks for kindly making it available to all of us!
Porsche picture[edit]
I'm using your Porsche picture in PowerPoint about game servers. ~~ JonW I'm using your Porsche picture on my website … with notes. ~~ Gerhard M. Buurman
Photo Usage[edit]
Hello AngMoKio I recently used a Bald Eagle photograph of yours as the basis for some vector art. Its released on my own website. THanks! bill
Using your photo: Hotair balloons amk.jpg[edit]
Hello,
We've just added your photo (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hotair_balloons_amk.jpg) on our website: www.picadilo.com . You have been credited accordingly here: http://www.picadilo.com/about.php .
Please let us know if everything is ok. A big thank you for sharing your great photos! Picadilo Team
- Hello AngMoKio, please let me know we need to change anything in the credits! Regards!
Sri Mariamman Temple in Singapour[edit]
Hello I'ld like to use your photo from Lord Krishna (Sri Mariamman Temple in Singapour) for a study group from the National Museum Volunteers of Bangkok. It's a private study group where each one of us (12) talks about a part of the chosen topic (this time, it's about the indianisation of South east Asia)and my part is about Vishnu. I like the picture you took and want to share it during my presentation to the group, if it's ok with you ? Thanks Bénédicte
Use of Images on the English Singapore Portal[edit]
Hi AngMoKio,
Thanks for uploading such beautiful images onto commons! I am currently updating the Singapore Portal, and I have used two of your featured images of Singapore on the portal as a "selected picture". Is that fine with you? Also, do you have any other pictures of Singapore?--Lionratz (talk) 04:19, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
- Hi Lionratz, that's of course fine with me. What kind of pictures do you need from Singapore? --AngMoKio (座谈) 10:34, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
Your Audi DTM photo[edit]
Hi AngMoKio,
I found one of your Audi DTM photos, liked it a lot and have used it on my non-commercial slot car website at www.tenamp.com at this url; http://www.tenamp.com/slot/carrera-27238-audi-a4-dtm.html
I've added a link back to your user page on Wikimedia Commons.
Thanks for sharing your photos.
I use some of your photos[edit]
Hello AngMoKio!
I have use some of yours photos of Aquila heliaca from wikimedia in my free software educational proyect "Animalandia" (http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia)
You can see directly in the follow link and click over "Siguiente" ("Next") several times:
http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/imagen.php?id=37339
I also allowed to take the presentation of your user page in wikimedia for your profile in Animalandia:
http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/autor.php?nombre=AngMoKio
I wish you could supplement it with a picture of yourself... I want show to my students (and so everybody) that Animalandia is make for "real person", and I can tell them about "generosity", "share" and other similar words that we use very few at this time...
This is my "contributor profile" and others, for example:
http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/autor.php?nombre=Fernando%20Lis%F3n%20Mart%EDn
http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/autor.php?nombre=Carmen%20Jim%E9nez
http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/autor.php?nombre=David%20P%E9rez
http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/autor.php?nombre=Boris%20Loboda
http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/autor.php?nombre=Steve%20Garvie%20%28Rainbirder%29
In the future, I use more of your photos, I sure!
Thank you for the licence and, of course, for your splendid photos!! Regards! Fernando Lisón
--Fernando.lison (talk) 18:58, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
- Tanks for you. A personal photo for your contributor profile? Fernando.lison (talk) 08:05, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Taipei 2012 2 amk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support ok --Christian Ferrer 19:30, 5 September 2013 (UTC) |
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Taipei 2012 amk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support QI --Rjcastillo 23:26, 4 September 2013 (UTC) |
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Taichung 2013 nightmarket 2 amk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. Heuschrecke 20:57, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Antonov An-2 OK-HFL amk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Very good -- Spurzem 06:21, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! HongKong market amk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:34, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! HongKong Mercedes-Benz SLS amk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. QI. No beautifull but interesting background -- Spurzem 10:40, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Taipei 2012 streetscene amk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. OK imo.--ArildV 14:44, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Antonov An-2 D-FKME amk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 16:05, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chinese lion amk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Florstein 14:58, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Doorknob buddhist temple amk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Isiwal 09:29, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Keelung coast detail amk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --JLPC 15:13, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Keelung coast amk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:29, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
|
Photo Usage[edit]
Dear AngMoKio, I just used your image of the Parliament Building in Budapest in my blog, Carbon Based, which focuses on climate change adaptation. Many thanks for making it available. http://carbon-based-ghg.blogspot.com/2013/10/hungary-hosting-water-summit-amid.html Brian Thomas
Greyhound Photo[edit]
Hi, I am using your greyhound photo (red racing jacket) in an assignment for my Web Design class. Thank you.
Hi - I am using your photo on my facebook page but have credited the wikipedia article where it is - hope this is ok Super photo - many thanks
File:Manhattan3 amk.jpg[edit]
Hi There,
I'm a graphic design student and I'm writing to ask your permission to use the above named photograph for a school project. It is not intended for any commercial purposes.
Thanks,
KatMac
Foto[edit]
Dürfte ich das Foto des roten Feuerwerks für einen Neujahrs-Wünsche-post der Johanniter Tübingen-Facebookseite verwenden?
Using Photo(s)[edit]
Hello and thank you! I saw that you requested attribution in print but I didn't see a request with regards to websites. I tried to use the email link on the photo page but got an error "No send address".
I will be using Manhattan4 amk.jpg, Manhattan amk.jpg, and Manhattan3 amk.jpg on a client website, each with "© 2007 AngMoKio" attribution.
Please let me know if you need further information.
use ofimage Zeppellin NT amk[edit]
Dear AnkMoKio I plan to use your Zeppelin NT image for a science presentation (My own images of the Zeppelin always had it with an advertisemnet on it) thanks for making it available
New user template[edit]
Hello.
I've created a new template to describe yourself : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:User_info2
I've use it on my user page.
Regards. --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:43, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
New level {{User PH-4}}[edit]
Hi ; new level 4 for you ?--Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 15:13, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
PH-4 | This user is able to take professional quality photographs. |
Using a Photo[edit]
宏茂侨先生，
您好！
I want to use this photo (Vatican StPaul Statue.jpg) as my facebook's cover. St.Paul is my patron saint. That picture is so beautiful, and I love it.
I expect to get your permission. Thank you very much!
Sincerely, Paul. L. Chaucer
File:Great Buddha Changhua 2 amk.jpg[edit]
|
File:彰化八卦山大佛.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Taivo (talk) 15:14, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Re: Audrey Hepburn street art picture[edit]
Hi AngMoKio
I would like very much to use this picture as the header photograph for a story due to appear on a website I co-run http://literallystories2014.com/ this Monday 27 July 2015.
The garish colours and the psychedelic feel to this art works wonderfully with the trippy nature of the story called Mr. Zimmerman Flies to Buenos Aires (Economy Class) and features the late Audrey Hepburn amongst others.
Thank you for generously making this photograph available for public use. Please note that that our website site is also free to use and we seek to make no profit from it only to help promote writers.
best wishes Adam West on behalf of Literally Stories
PS - we have a section for 'Artists' with their own pages and CV/bio and links to their own websites which we can set you for you if you wish?
Fireworks4 amk.jpg image use[edit]
Hi -- I used Fireworks4 amk.jpg on a blog post, credited with your username, license and link to the wikimedia file. Thank you.
Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign for User:The Photographer[edit]
Please excuse me spamming you, which concerns Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign. My contributions cover the architecture and culture of Brazil and Venezuela. I has basic photographic equipment: an old D300 camera and 35mm lens, and it is very expensive for me to acquire this equipment. I has recently taken several images using the technique where multiple frames are stitched together to create a high-resolution panorama. However, many times frustrated with the stitching errors that result from trying to take such photos without a proper panoramic head for his tripod. This special equipment permits the camera to be rotated around the entrance pupil of the lens, and eliminates such errors. Having a panoramic head would greatly increase the potential for The Photographer to create sharp high-resolution images for Commons. In addition, the purchase of a camera with a fisheye lens would enable 180 × 360° panoramas to be taken, which are a great way to explore a scene as though one is really there.
Please see the discussion about the Crowd-funding campaign on User talk:The Photographer#Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign and visit the Generosity Crowd-funding Campaign page to consider donating. Even a modest donation will make a difference if many people contribute. Thanks. --The Photographer 13:56, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Use of phote: Chiang Kai-Shek Memorial Hall[edit]
Guten Tag AngmoKio,
I am currently editing google site of our company(a tour agency). In the site we are introducing our Taipei City sightseeing tours and CKS Memorial Hall is one of the spots. Therefore, I'd like to use one of your photos: The National Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall in Taipei on Taiwan. on our website. Please allow me to use it and if you like, you can see our website later on when we finish editing it.
Vielen Dank! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Willneverknows (talk • contribs) 03:46, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion[edit]
|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. |
Affected:
I started a mass deletion request for all interiors of the Stuttgart Stadtbibliothek as they are all unfree h-stt !? 16:35, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
File:Mercedes-Benz SLR Stirling Moss amk.jpg[edit]
|
|
File:Mercedes-Benz SLR Stirling Moss amk.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
105.154.225.17 11:56, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Using the dirigible picture on my blog[edit]
Hi. I was looking for dirigible pictures on google and I've found your picture to be ideal for my blog. My blog is about health, metabolic rate and chronic fatigue, but an article is about traveling, planes, ships, and dirigibles. Is there any problem? The blog will be online in a few days if you want to see it. FatigueRecovery.co is the domain name. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by MarcoTheDunker (talk • contribs) 04:51, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
Using your picture "Haekkinen 2007 amk.jpg"[edit]
Hey there, I am using your picture of Mika Häkkinen on my quote-collecting website. You asked to be notified when someone does so. This is the web-link: https://myzitate.de/mika-hakkinen/ Hope this is okay for you? Thank you in advance! :)
Photo: National Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall[edit]
Dear AngMoKio,
I'd like to kindly ask, whether this photo of yours could be used in an exhibition in Porta Westfalica, Germany?
Please let me know under which license we can show this picture.
Kind regards! —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.186.180.166 (talk) 08:33, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
101[edit]
你好，想借用你从国父纪念馆看台北101的照片，作为教学使用，可以吗？ —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 204.102.229.130 (talk) 15:07, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
Castel Sant'Angelo/St. Angelo and Ponte Sant'Angelo (Rome)[edit]
Hi AngMoKio I wish to use the above named photo for a university assignment. I will use it without alteration. Within my bibliogrphy I will name you as the photographer I hope this is acceptable to you. My thanks Julie —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 222.154.70.239 (talk) 00:05, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Use of zeppelin NT photo[edit]
Hi, I'd like to include your photo on the first section (which includes a brief summary of state of the art airships) of my thesis if that's ok with you. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 187.170.166.40 (talk) 22:16, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
Image usage[edit]
Hi, I would like to use your photo in interactive course presentation. I hope you'll allow me. thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2001:4455:6D9:DE00:A87B:4E24:8B0E:8C21 (talk) 04:08, 13 June 2021 (UTC)