User talk:MJJR
|
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Luxor West Bank R12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Pudelek 21:47, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Luxor West Bank R09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:11, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Colombey-les-Deux-Eglises Monument aux Morts R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 03:55, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Saulcy Aube Monument aux Morts R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:17, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bar-sur-Aube Mairie R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bar-sur-Aube Eglise Saint-Pierre R09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:38, 28 June 2018 (UTC) |
--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Brugge Oude Burg R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --СССР 21:46, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Colombey-les-Deux-Eglises Cimetière R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! L'Epine Marne Eglise R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! L'Epine Marne Eglise R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Peulle 23:46, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Châlons-en-Champagne Cathédrale R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Châlons-en-Champagne Cathédrale R04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! L'Epine Marne Eglise R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality -- Spurzem 20:06, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! L'Epine Marne Eglise R04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality -- Spurzem 20:06, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Châlons-en-Champagne Rue de la Marne R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Meetkerke Poldermolen R04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality, but it looks a bit oversharpened to me --Michielverbeek 03:54, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dienville Halle R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality - although I do recommend a slight crop in the left to get rid of that car's bumper. --Peulle 21:55, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dienville Monument aux Morts R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Peulle 21:54, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Vauchonvilliers R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:45, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Vauchonvilliers Monument aux Morts R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:45, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Longpré-le-Sec Monument aux Morts R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Peulle 22:07, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Longpré-le-Sec Eglise R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Moroder 11:16, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! SS Karim R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Brugge Oud StJan R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Seven Pandas 03:16, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ceiba speciosa R10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
Happy holidays! 2019! ;)[edit]
.jpg/150px-Christmas_Cheer_12-22-13m_(11629901684).jpg)
|
|
* Happy Holidays 2019, MJJR! * | |
-- George Chernilevsky talk 08:55, 23 December 2018 (UTC) |
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Felucca R08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --GT1976 13:43, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Luxor Temple R15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. A more specific description (on the image page) would be wise, because Luxor Temple is a huge area. Which area of the temple ruins do we see here? --Aristeas 09:40, 5 January 2019 (UTC)  Done Description on image page completed. -- MJJR 20:39, 5 January 2019 (UTC) Support Good. --Johannes Robalotoff 14:44, 6 January 2019 (UTC) |
--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Luxor New Mosque R05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Isiwal 12:30, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2018 is open![edit]
Dear MJJR,
You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in R1 of the 2018 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2018) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked.
In the final (and current) round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2018.
Round 2 will end 17 March 2019, 23:59:59.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 18:04, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Zierikzee Kapellestraat R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:51, 7 June 2019 (UTC) |
--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Brugge Oranjerie Dijver R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. SupportGood quality. --Manfred Kuzel 10:10, 14 June 2019 (UTC) Support Good quality, seems to fufill all seven elements of (line, shape, space, value, form, texture, and color.) --大诺史 12:15, 14 June 2019 (UTC) |
--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
Photo walk in Stockholm[edit]
It's only a few weeks until Wikimania 2019 in Sweden. I'd like to invite you to the Commons Photographer's photo walk. If you're planning on going to Stockholm in August, please consider joining this event. This is an opportunity to connect with other photographers, have fun together, and explore the beauty of an iconic Scandinavian city… All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:59, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dredger Mellina R04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Cayambe 06:34, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Brugge Potterierei nr80 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Brugge Potterierei nr80 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Monuments France 2019[edit]
Bonjour,
Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est de retour et ouvert jusqu'à 31 septembre ! Déjà 8313 photos ont été importés cette année, vous aussi rejoignez le concours !
Le concours concerne tous les monuments présents dans la base Mérimée (qu'ils soient classés, inscrits ou simplement classés). De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la chapelle au coin de la rue aux mégalithes en forêt, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Où que vous soyez il y a des monuments autour de chez vous. Enfin, vous pouvez mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments. Pour information, le règlement est disponible sur le site du concours. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !
Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international sélectionnera ensuite des meilleures photographies mondiales.
Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.
P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France les années précédentes. Si vous avez déjà ou si ne pouvez pas participer au concours cette année, faites passer le message autour de vous pour que de nouveaux et nouvelles photographes rejoignent l'aventure !
Bonne journée,
Sarah Krichen WMFr et Nicolas Vigneron, pour l'équipe de Wiki Loves Monuments France, 14:51, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019! Please help with this survey.[edit]
Dear MJJR,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.
You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.
To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.
Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team 12:32, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Nile Rowing Boats R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
Invitation to participate in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 Participant Survey (Reminder)[edit]
Dear MJJR,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.
You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.
To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.
Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team 03:42, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
Happy holidays 2020![edit]
|
* Happy Holidays 2020, MJJR! * | |
-- George Chernilevsky talk 14:04, 23 December 2019 (UTC) |
|
Your best shot 2019[edit]
Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,
It's early 2020, which means it's time again to look back at photographs taken over the course of the past 12 months. As always, I'm curious – what would you consider your best shot of 2019 and why? I invite you to share your image and your thoughts in order to provide others with the opportunity to celebrate, learn, and enjoy:
Thanks for all your effort in sharing your vision of the world with others under a free license!
All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 20:20, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Philae Temple R01[edit]
Please see Commons:Village pump#Misplaced invitation to "tag" images and Commons:Village pump#Depicts regarding your edits to File:Philae Temple R01.jpg, which I have reverted - not your fault, the problem is with the tool and its instructions. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:25, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Luxor West Bank R21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Commons Photographers User Group: Meeting on May 30, 2020[edit]
Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,
I’d like to invite you to our group’s first Virtual Meeting on Saturday, May 30, 2020. The meeting will serve as an opportunity to get to know each other better, share learnings, and connect in times of the global COVID-19 pandemic.
Please take a look at the meeting page and add your name to the list of participants if you’re planning to attend.
Hope to see you in a week! All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 17:10, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Brugge Beeldenmakersstraat R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality --Llez 04:04, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Brugge Gentpoort R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality --Llez 04:04, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Brugge Wollestraat R04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Brugge Johannes Nepomucenus R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
--QICbot (talk) 05:45, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Noirmoutier Maison Lebreton-des-Grapillères R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality --Michielverbeek 14:09, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
Commons Photographers User Group: Meeting on September 26 and other stuff[edit]
Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,
I've got a quick update for you, containing three items:
- I’d like to invite you to our group’s second Virtual Meeting on Saturday, September 26, 2020. As last time, this meeting will serve as an opportunity to get to know each other better, share learnings, and connect in times of the global COVID-19 pandemic. If you'd like to present, please add your name and the proposed topic to the list on the talk page.
- Also, I'd like to start a conversation about how we should be sharing responsibility for the user group going forward. I'd love to get some help when it comes to organizing things and I'm convinced that we can achieve more if a couple of people helped with coordinating stuff.
- Finally, the Wikimedia Foundation has asked me to spread the word about their latest survey: Universal Code of Conduct Survey. The goal is to create a safer environment on Wikimedia projects and the Foundation gathers feedback prior to coming up with a first draft.
Hope to see you at the Zoom meeting in September!
All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:06, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
Reminder: User Group Meeting this Saturday[edit]
Dear Commons Photographers User Group member,
This is a quick reminder that our second virtual meeting will take place this Saturday, September 26. The agenda entails presentations about drone photography, about the story behind a featured picture, and about the future of LRMediaWiki. We'll also discuss photographers’ contacts with the Wikimedia Foundation and the election of representatives for our user group. You'll find information about all of this on the event page:
I'm also inviting you to share some information about yourself and your photography work with other members of the user group on our new membership list:
I hope you're well during these difficult times. All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:22, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion[edit]
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, VIGNERON (talk) 07:50, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Petit-Fort-Philippe R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Moroder 04:37, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
Commons Photographers User Group meeting on Saturday[edit]
Dear Commons Photographers User Group member,
I'd like to invite you to our next virtual meeting on Saturday, December 12. We'll have two presentations: Habib Mhenni aka Dyolf77 will answer the question Do "we" need DSLRs anymore? and Martin Falbisoner will walk us through the making of his featured picture File:Caribbean_Sea_-_Long_Exposure.jpg.
If you can make it, please add your name to the list of attendees to this page:
I hope to see you in three days. Also, I wish you, your family, and your friends all the best for 2021. Your contributions to Commons make a big difference.
Warmly, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:26, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
Happy holidays 2020/2021![edit]
|
* Happy Holidays 2020/2021, MJJR! * | |
-- George Chernilevsky talk 14:46, 23 December 2020 (UTC) |
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Château d'Eu R08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Certainly not ideal light, but good quality. Possibly a small dust or water spot on the upper left, on the left side of the dark cloud. -- Ikan Kekek 05:00, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Your most memorable shot 2020[edit]
Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,
Over the course of the past two years, we've been sharing pictures that have a special meaning with each other at the start of the new year. Today, I'm inviting you add your most memorable shot of 2020 to this page:
I hope you, your familiy, and your friends are well during these difficult times. I wish you all the best for 2021 and I can't wait to see what your most memorable shot of 2020 looks like.
Warmly, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 20:52, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
File:Misr Oil Company Logo R01.jpg[edit]
 |
File:Misr Oil Company Logo R01.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.
The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.
|
Glorious 93 (talk) 18:12, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Next Commons Photographers meeting featuring large format photographer Ben Horne[edit]
Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,
I'm happy to invite you to our next virtual meeting on Saturday, March 20, at the usual time. As I mentioned during our last get-together, I'd like to invite external guests every now and then, given that it seems good to expand our view and learn something from someone outside our community.
Our first external guest, Ben Horne, will talk about large format wilderness photography, followed by a question-and-answer session. Ben is maybe one of best known contemporary large format photographers in the United States. On his excursions to national parks, he shoots 8×10 film and talks about his adventures on his YouTube channel which has attracted more than 48,000 followers so far. He is YouTube's first, and longest active landscape photography vlogger and I'm thrilled that he has agreed to join our next meeting and talk about his experiences.
If you're interested in joining this meeting, please sign up on the page below:
Also, don't forget to post your question(s) prior to the meeting on the following page in order to ensure a good and fruitful question-and-answer session:
I'm very much looking forward to this event and I hope you'll be able to join.
All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 21:56, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Reminder: Commons Photographers meeting tomorrow[edit]
Just a quick reminder: the meeting with large format-photographer Ben Horne will happen tomorrow, Saturday, March 20. If you haven't done yet, please consider signing up for the event and add your questions to this page. This will be our first virtual meeting in 2021 and I'd be super happy if you could join. All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 16:53, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pallieter Hopper Dredger R04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 06:37, 24 March 2021 (UTC) Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 08:14, 24 March 2021 (UTC) |
--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Brugge Begijnhof R08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. {{{3}}}
|