User talk:Llez

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Llez!













Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Epitonium angulatum, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Arothron nigropunctatus - Wilhelma 02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Arothron nigropunctatus - Wilhelma 02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Barbatia decussata, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hohenschwangau Castle 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Gugalcrom123 15:19, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hohenschwangau Castle 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Barbatia decussata, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vexillum micra 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 06:46, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Neuschwanstein Castle 07.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Neuschwanstein Castle 07.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alpsee - Pindarplatz - Hohenschwangau Castle - Alpenrose - Neuschwanstein Castle 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 07:04, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alpsee - Hohenschwangau Castle - Alpenrose - Neuschwanstein Castle 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:24, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alpsee - Hohenschwangau Castle - Alpenrose - Neuschwanstein Castle 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:28, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alpsee 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:28, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tegelbergbahn 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:04, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neuschwanstein Castle 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:03, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mirapecten mirificus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:01, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vexillum micra, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tegelbergbahn 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 06:31, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tegelbergbahn 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:36, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tegelbergbahn 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:36, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mirapecten mirificus 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:33, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vexillum castum, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paraglider - Tegelberg 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Nice! --ArildV 07:54, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paraglider - Tegelberg 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:54, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paraglider - Tegelberg 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:13, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mirapecten mirificus (Miraculous Scallop), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mirapecten mirificus (Miraculous Scallop), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Branderschrofen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:51, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hoher Straußberg 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:51, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from Tegelberg 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:51, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from Tegelberg 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:51, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Branderschrofen 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:32, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from Tegelberg - Zugspitze 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:32, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from Tegelberg 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:30, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anadara antiquata 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:32, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vexillum unifasciale, shell, juvenile.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pseudonebularia lienardi, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carlina acaulis - Tegelberg 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:38, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Branderschrofen 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:38, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paraglider - Tegelberg 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:37, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anadara antiquata 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:37, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tegelbergbahn 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 19:33, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Wieskirche 05.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wieskirche 05.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schlosspark Linderhof - Kaskade - Musikpavillon 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:19, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schlosspark Linderhof - Kaskade 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 06:17, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schlosspark Linderhof - Neptunbrunnen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 06:17, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schlosspark Linderhof - Amor mit Delfinen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:19, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schlosspark Linderhof - Famabrunnen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:08, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schlosspark Linderhof - Gartenvase 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:08, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schlosspark Linderhof - Gartenvase 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
This looks slightly rotated clockwise. --Plozessor 06:20, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thanks for the review --Llez 07:20, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 19:11, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Neocancilla kayae, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Linderhof - Gärtnerhaus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:28, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schlosspark Linderhof - Amor 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:28, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tegelbergbahn 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support The sky is a bit weird, but QI for me. --C messier 21:32, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vexillum stercopunctis, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schlosspark Linderhof - Hundinghütte 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:55, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schlosspark Linderhof - Hundinghütte 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:52, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schlosspark Linderhof - Hundinghütte 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:55, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schlosspark Linderhof - Hundinghütte 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:01, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barbatia barbata var. elongata 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:52, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schlosspark Linderhof - Maurischer Kiosk 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:57, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schlosspark Linderhof - Maurischer Kiosk 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 07:13, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schlosspark Linderhof - Maurischer Kiosk 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:02, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schlosspark Linderhof - Ehemalige Bauhütte 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:02, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schlosspark Linderhof - Einsiedelei des Gurnemanz 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 17:09, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schlosspark Linderhof - Einsiedelei des Gurnemanz 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 17:09, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barbatia barbata var. elongata 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 17:07, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Barbatia barbata var. elongata (European Bearded Ark), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:18, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schlosspark Linderhof - Ostparterre 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
The top part is a bit noisy. --Plozessor 06:35, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thanks for the review --Llez 09:07, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 10:15, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schlosspark Linderhof - Maurischer Kiosk 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:35, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schlosspark Linderhof - Maurischer Kiosk 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:21, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schlosspark Linderhof - Wasserparterre 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:50, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schlosspark Linderhof - Wasserparterre 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:22, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schlosspark Linderhof - Wasserparterre 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:01, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Glycymeris obovata 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.

--QICbot (talk) 13:53, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Barbatia barbata var. elongata (European Bearded Ark), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pusia zebrina, shell, spotted form.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schlosspark Linderhof - Terrassengärten - Wasserparterre 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Please have a look to the castle. It looks like tilted CW. --XRay 16:14, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thanks for the review --Llez 17:42, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --XRay 18:10, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Linderhof Palace 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:51, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Linderhof Palace 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:39, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Linderhof Palace 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:42, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Linderhof Palace 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:39, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lirophora paphia 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:41, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pusia zebrina, shell, striped form.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Glycymeris obovata, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Linderhof Palace 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:55, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Suggest to add CAT:Statues of Nike ... --Tagooty 06:04, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thanks for the hint --Llez 06:48, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Linderhof Palace 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Suggest to add a CAT:Statues of Atlas in ... --Tagooty 06:02, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Linderhof Palace 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:17, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Linderhof Palace 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:18, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Longchaeus acus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:55, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schlosspark Linderhof - Königshäuschen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:54, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schlosspark Linderhof - Königslinde 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:23, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Linderhof Palace 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Quality is fine but I'd add at least one more category about the items --Poco a poco 07:48, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done I improved the file description and added the sculpturer (in the text and as category) --Llez 08:05, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:48, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Linderhof Palace 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:23, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fröhliche Weihnachten![edit]

Friedvolle Weihnachten und ein gesundes, glückliches neues Jahr 2024!

-- Radomianin (talk) 12:45, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Schöne Feiertage[edit]

Christmas star decoration at a window with the reflection of a sunset Happy Holidays, H. Zell

Merry Christmas and a happy new year!
Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!
Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
Buon Natale e felice anno nuovo!
Frohe Weihnachten und ein gutes neues Jahr!

Aristeas (talk) 16:02, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Cavolinia tridentata 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cavolinia tridentata 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Longchaeus acus (Needle Pyram), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Maoricolpus roseus manukauensis (Rosy Screw Snail), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ostrea edulis 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:47, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays and best wishes![edit]

Happy holidays!
Merry christmas!
Best wishes for 2024!

-- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:01, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays![edit]

  * Happy Holidays! *  
  • Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
  • Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
  • Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

   -- George Chernilevsky talk 22:07, 22 December 2023 (UTC)   [reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ostrea edulis 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:55, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schlosspark Linderhof - Maurischer Kiosk 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 20:27, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays[edit]

  • Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
  • Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
  • Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

Pierre André (talk) 16:36, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ocenebra helleri, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ostrea edulis (European Flat Oyster), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paraglider - Buchenberg 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:55, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paraglider - Buchenberg 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:55, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Agathistoma fasciatum 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Is it just my impression, or are all the shells seriously out of focus? --Plozessor 06:55, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Info The shell has only 9 mm in diamaeter! --Llez 09:24, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Ok, didn't notice that this has really high resolution. At 4 MP it's perfectly fine. --Plozessor 19:51, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Frohe Weihnachten und ein glückliches neues Jahr![edit]

wünscht von Herzen

Reinhold Möller / Ermell (talk) 11:40, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ermell (talk) 11:40, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays![edit]

  * Happy Holidays! *  
  • Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
  • Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
  • Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

   --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:07, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buchenberg 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:59, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buchenberg 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:22, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buchenberg - Flurkreuz 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:22, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tegula excavata 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:00, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paraglider - Buchenberg 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:57, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Frohe Weihnachten![edit]

Traditional German advent wreath in Lonsee, my home village

Merry Christmas and best wishes for 2024!
Joyeux Noël et une bonne année 2024 !
Frohe Weihnachten und alles Gute für 2024!

AFBorchert (talk) 07:56, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ostrea edulis (European Flat Oyster), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schlosspark Linderhof - Wasserparterre 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:32, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buchenberg 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:32, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buchenberg 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Moo! (translated "Good quality!"). --Plozessor 07:12, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buchenberg 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 07:12, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mimachlamys punctata 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:32, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 07:55, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buchenberg 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 06:33, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buchenberg 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:36, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buchenberg 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:21, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mimachlamys punctata 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 06:33, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 08:46, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Agathistoma fasciatum (Smooth Atlantic Tegula), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mimachlamys punctata (Freckled Fan Scallop), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tegula excavata (Green-based Tegula), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baumkronenweg Walderlebniszentrum Ziegelwies 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 07:23, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neuschwanstein Castle 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 07:23, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trigonostoma semidisjunctum 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:29, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baumkronenweg Walderlebniszentrum Ziegelwies 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 06:17, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baumkronenweg Walderlebniszentrum Ziegelwies 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:14, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baumkronenweg Walderlebniszentrum Ziegelwies 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 06:17, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baumkronenweg Walderlebniszentrum Ziegelwies 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:14, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Scalptia obliquata 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 08:13, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baumkronenweg Walderlebniszentrum Ziegelwies 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:26, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mimachlamys punctata (Freckled Fan Scallop), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lechfall - Füssen 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 06:38, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lechfall - Füssen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 16:42, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baumkronenweg Walderlebniszentrum Ziegelwies 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 09:05, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baumkronenweg Walderlebniszentrum Ziegelwies 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 06:39, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corculum cardissa 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 09:05, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Trigonostoma semidisjunctum (Disjunct Nutmeg), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lechfall - Füssen 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:45, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lechfall - Füssen 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:44, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lechfall - Füssen 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:19, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corculum cardissa 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:43, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Écomusée d’Alsace 53.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Écomusée d’Alsace 53.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Corculum cardissa (Heart Cockle), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Scalptia obliquata (Oblique Nutmeg), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lechklamm - Füssen 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:00, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lechklamm - Füssen 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:44, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:02, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lechklamm - Füssen 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:44, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:02, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lechklamm - Füssen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --DXR 08:18, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mitra mitra 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:41, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Corculum cardissa (Heart Cockle), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lech - Füssen 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 06:44, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lech - Füssen 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 06:44, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lech - Füssen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 11:02, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bursa bufonia 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 06:43, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mitra mitra (Episcopal Miter), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lech - Füssen 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 06:48, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lech - Füssen 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 06:48, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lech - Füssen 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:36, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lech - Füssen 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 06:55, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dosinia lupinus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 06:55, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bursa bufonia (Warty Frog Snail), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kunst-Raststätte Illertal-Ost 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:36, 1 January 2024 (UTC) Sorry[reply]
 Comment Please sign the vote --Llez 06:27, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hopfensee 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 07:02, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dosinia lupinus 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:25, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:47, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 07:55, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:29, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riedböhringen - Pfarrhaus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 18:08, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dosinia lupinus ssp. incta, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:09, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:47, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dosinia lupinus ssp. lincta, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Typhis tubifer, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- ~~~~

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- ~~~~

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:53, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:53, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nuttallia obscurata 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:53, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Olivancillaria vesica 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Olivancillaria vesica 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tritia bocholtensis, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:34, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:34, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --DXR 07:46, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:35, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nuttallia obscurata 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:35, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nuttallia obscurata, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Picture is good but please fix the invalid category. --Plozessor 06:25, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Oops, sorry --Llez 08:25, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:25, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 16:42, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crassispira cerithina 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:53, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 06:34, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 06:34, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:38, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 07:17, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Drillia angolensis 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 06:34, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Crassispira cerithina, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nuttallia obscurata, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 07:13, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support I think this should be slightly rotated, otherwise it's really good. --Plozessor 07:13, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 07:13, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 07:53, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ostrea gregarea 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:04, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 06:30, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 06:30, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dallocardia muricata 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 06:32, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 18:48, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:31, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Drillia angolensis, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ostrea gregarea, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:58, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:58, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:52, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:35, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Perrona spirata 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:35, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:27, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:31, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:26, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:38, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Scalptia crenifera 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:25, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Alpsee - Pindarplatz - Hohenschwangau Castle - Alpenrose - Neuschwanstein Castle 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Alpsee - Pindarplatz - Hohenschwangau Castle - Alpenrose - Neuschwanstein Castle 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Perrona spirata, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oberbergen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:14, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vineyards - Oberbergen 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:15, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vineyards - Oberbergen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:37, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pseudamussium peslutrae 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:11, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Scalptia crenifera, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ludwigsburg Palace 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 06:28, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ludwigsburg Palace 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:15, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ludwigsburg Palace 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 06:28, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ludwigsburg Palace 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:17, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pseudamussium peslutrae 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:14, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 21:01, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pumpkin 'Sweet Dumpling' 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
A bit grainy, do you think you could apply a bit more NR while retaining sharpness? --Plozessor 10:00, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thanks for the review --Llez 14:09, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Thx! Good quality. --Plozessor 14:22, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Emichsburg 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:16, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:16, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Emichsburg 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:16, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:18, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ludwigsburg Palace 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:12, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ludwigsburg Palace 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Left side is slightly leaning outward. --Plozessor 06:17, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thanks for the review --Llez 09:52, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 09:58, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pseudamussium peslutrae (Seven Rayed Scallop) left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pseudamussium peslutrae (Seven Rayed Scallop) right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carved pumpkin - Ludwigsburg 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 13:09, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carved pumpkin - Ludwigsburg 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:25, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carved pumpkin - Ludwigsburg 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:24, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Calabash 'Indian Mix' 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 13:09, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ludwigsburg Palace - Fountain 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
This is tilted ccw. --Plozessor 06:24, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thanks for the hint --Llez 07:16, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 08:30, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Favartia rosamiae, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mancinella armigera (Belligerent Rock Snail), shell, juvenile.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pumpkin festival - Ludwigsburg 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:13, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pumpkin festival - Ludwigsburg 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:30, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pumpkin festival - Ludwigsburg 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 07:50, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pumpkin festival - Ludwigsburg 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:30, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Meiocardia vulgaris 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:30, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mistake on an identification ?[edit]

Maybe i'm wrong but your file https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Larus_argentatus_-_Bremerhaven_01.jpg show a yellow-legged bird. But the Larus Argentatus got pinkish leggs so maybe it can be a Larus fuscus or other ? 2A01:CB1C:41D:3000:A73F:5E18:CD97:D4D6 17:48, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I submitted this great photo to an expert ornithologist, Stanislas Wroza. He thinks this bird is a Lesser black-backed gull (Larus fuscus). Jastrow (Λέγετε) 08:19, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pumpkin festival - Ludwigsburg 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 08:16, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pumpkin festival - Ludwigsburg 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Figure and story related categories should be added --Ermell 06:38, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thanks for the review --Llez 09:44, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. Thank you. --Ermell 11:47, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pumpkin festival - Ludwigsburg 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:19, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pumpkin festival - Ludwigsburg 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 08:22, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Meiocardia vulgaris 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:30, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Meiocardia vulgaris, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pumpkin festival - Ludwigsburg 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:06, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Meiocardia vulgaris, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ocenebra hybrida, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Unio terminalis 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 06:36, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Austrolittorina antipodum, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chlamys textoria 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:53, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Set Promoted to FP[edit]

This set has been promoted to Featured picture!

The set Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Statues on the gable of Linderhof Palace, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Statues on the gable of Linderhof Palace has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another set, please do so !

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chlamys textoria, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hiatula diphos 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:50, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FP Linderhof Statuen[edit]

Hallo! alles gut bei dir? ich bin überrascht gewesen, dass letztendlich die Stauen über einen Set FP geworden sind. Aus meiner Sicht wurden die Richtlinien für einen Set nicht erfüllt, gut, egal. Was aber definitiv nicht stimmen kann, ist dass auch dieses Bild File:Linderhof Palace 07.jpg als FP bezeichnet wurde. Ich würde also den Star entfernen, wenn du es auch so siehst. Viele Grüße, Poco a poco (talk) 10:28, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Myurellopsis parkinsoni 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Myurellopsis parkinsoni 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hiatula diphos 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:47, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hiatula diphos, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cerithium albolineatum, form with multiple lines, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hiatula diphos, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Isognomon dunkeri 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:41, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Isognomon dunkeri 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:11, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Isognomon dunkeri, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Isognomon dunkeri, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bulla striata 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rangan Datta Wiki 08:58, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Écomusée d’Alsace 47.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Écomusée d’Alsace 47.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ostrea edulis 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 09:50, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bulla striata (Atlantic bubble), fossil shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ostrea edulis 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 06:42, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ostrea edulis (European Flat Oyste), fossil right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pupa solidula 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:50, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:59, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ostrea edulis (European Flat Oyster), fossil left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Minnivola pyxidata 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Radomianin 06:27, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Haminoea orbignyana, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Minnivola pyxidata 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:12, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pupa solidula (Solid Pupa), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Calliostoma hernandezi 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:25, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:View from Eisenberg castle 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:View from Eisenberg castle 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Minnivola pyxidata (Box Scallop), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Minnivola pyxidata (Box Scallop), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Calliostoma hernandezi, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nemocardium bechei 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 06:28, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 11:50, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nemocardium bechei 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rangan Datta Wiki 06:11, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 12:15, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Calliostoma depictum, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nemocardium bechei (De la Beche's Cockle), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maoricolpus roseus 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:26, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nemocardium bechei (De la Beche's Cockle), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]







Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paphia rotundata 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:15, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Calliostoma pulchrum, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bittium reticulatum forma scabrum, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paphia rotundata 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 09:10, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Pumpkin festival - Ludwigsburg 07.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pumpkin festival - Ludwigsburg 07.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Paphia rotundata (Butterfly Venus), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Paphia rotundata (Butterfly Venus), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hemicycla quadricincta quadricincta 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:00, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bittium reticulatum forma antonium, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Protapes gallus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:33, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Protapes gallus 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:14, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Protapes gallus (Rooster Venus), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hemicycla quadricincta subaucta 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:20, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Napaeus spec 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:39, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Protapes gallus (Rooster Venus), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Meretrix intercalaris 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:29, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 08:40, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Set Promoted to FP[edit]

This set has been promoted to Featured picture!

The set Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Nemocardium bechei, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Nemocardium bechei has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another set, please do so !

/Poco a poco (talk) 10:14, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arca navicularis 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:16, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Napaeus servus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:27, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Arca navicularis (Indo-Pacific Ark), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Meretrix intercalaris, internal mould.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hemicycla idairae 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:09, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Napaeus servus, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pseudochama corbierei 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:11, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hemicycla idairae, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pseudochama corbierei 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:30, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pseudochama corbierei, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Napaeus magnus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:06, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hemicycla fritschi 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:21, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Los Christianos - Tenerife - Port 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:00, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Napaeus magnus, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pseudochama corbierei, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Hopfensee 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hopfensee 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Momordica balsamina - La Gomera 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:08, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Windows - Playa Santiago 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 19:20, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Volcanic layers - Playa Santiago 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:08, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Laevichlamys squamosa 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:08, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Montaña de los Ramones - La Gomera 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:48, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Laevichlamys squamosa 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 06:58, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hemicycla fritschi, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Laevichlamys squamosa (Squamose Scallop), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rocks - Vegaipala - La Gomera 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:46, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lo del Gato - La Gomera 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:46, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lomo del Azadoe - La Gomera.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:43, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canariella discobolus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:41, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! House Alajeró - La Gomera 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:39, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hemicycla distensa 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:28, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rocks - Playa Santiago 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:31, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palm grove - Las Toscas 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 08:24, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palm grove - Las Toscas 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:42, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Laevichlamys squamosa (Squamose Scallop), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Canariella discobolus, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Scaeochlamys livida 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:23, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Scaeochlamys livida 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:00, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hemicycla distensa, shell, banded form.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hemicycla distensa 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:18, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roque de Tecina - La Gomera 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 08:41, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roque de Tecina - La Gomera 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 07:15, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rocks - Vegaipala - La Gomera 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:23, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rocks - Vegaipala - La Gomera 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 08:40, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Scaeochlamys livida (Livid Scallop), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hemicycla distensa 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 08:22, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from Mirador de Retama - La Gomera 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 17:01, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from Mirador de Retama - La Gomera 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:37, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Scaeochlamys livida (Livid Scallop), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hemicycla distensa, shell, spotted form.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Decatopecten radula 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:27, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hemicycla distensa, shell, unicoloured form.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Decatopecten radula 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:19, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from Mirador de la Curva del Queso - La Gomera 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 07:24, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rocks - Mirador de la Curva del Queso - La Gomera 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:35, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rocks - Playa Santiago 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 18:00, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rocks - Vegaipala - La Gomera 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 18:30, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Decatopecten radula (Radula Scallop), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]