Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Zygaena lonicerae caterpillar.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File:Zygaena lonicerae caterpillar.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2010 at 07:49:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Young caterpillar of Narrow-bordered Five-spot Burnet. Photo taken on strand of lake Žiaunė.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded & nominated by Darius Baužys talk 07:49, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Darius Baužys talk 07:49, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Looks very good in thumbnail, but oversharpened and poor details in full view. For photoprint maybe ok but for studying purposes it's insufficient.   • Richard • [®] • 12:52, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Oversharpened, but OK. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 04:00, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Steindy (talk) 10:02, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- BBB (below the bug bar) -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 10:38, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Great picture but unfortunately very noisy --Dein Freund der Baum (talk) 11:40, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Not hard to look at (as implied) Mlpearc pull my chain 'Tribs 15:20, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like this one. More than good quality iMO. Furthermore, I have a Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question: is an oppose review explained only by letters "BBB" (what is a "bug", here ?) sufficient ? Isn't it too badly depreciative and contemptuous for the nominator ? My English is not very good...--Jebulon (talk) 17:47, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - It appears I'm being a victim of my own process... Good sign. But no need for fundamentalisms. The level of the present insect ('bug') bar can be easily preceived by quicky browsing the FP gallery. No, I'm not being depreciative or contemptuous. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:40, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment You, Alvesgaspar, a victim ??? Face-smile.svg...Anyway, thanks for answering. No worries. And I'm very sorry to be an idiot : a quickly browsing was not enough to me for perceiving easily the bad level of this image. I'll try to improve.--Jebulon (talk) 17:12, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose really, really sorry, cause the composition is so good and nice that it really hurts me to oppose! But as Richard allready said, the full view not so nice anymore. Its a pitty that nearly all of your pics are so heavy sharped. greetings mathias K 14:17, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose, composition-wise this is "ABB", but it's just a little too unsharp in my opinion. --Aqwis (talk) 16:45, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Good composition, but not quite up to snuff on the the technical side. Steven Walling 20:16, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 08:14, 14 June 2010 (UTC)