User talk:Alvesgaspar
|
1 (2006-7), 2 (2007), 3, 4, 5, 6 (2008), 7, 8, 9, 10 (2009), 11, 12, 13, 14 (2010), 15, 16, 17, 18 (2011), 19, 20, 21, 22 (2012), 23, 24, 25, 26 (2013), 27, 28, 29, 30 (2014), 31, 32, 33, 34 (2015), 35, 36 (2016), 37, 38, 39 (2017, 2018) |
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Happy New 2019[edit]
|
Happy New 2019 |
| Pan de jamón and Hallaca are a typical Christmas dish of my country, and I would like to share it with you, wishing you the best year 2019.. I would like to give you this humble recognition. Happy year 2019 dear!!! Photographer 01:44, 3 January 2019 (UTC) |
FP Promotion[edit]
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Alcázar Seville April 2019-11.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Alcázar Seville April 2019-11.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Ponte Barca Abril 2019-1c.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ponte Barca Abril 2019-1c.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Basilica di San Pietro in Vaticano September 2015-1a.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Basilica di San Pietro in Vaticano September 2015-1a.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
The merit is for you! Yann (talk) 09:08, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Ponte Barca Abril 2019-3a.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ponte Barca Abril 2019-3a.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
Community Insights Survey[edit]
Share your experience in this survey
Hi Alvesgaspar,
The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 01:00, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]
Share your experience in this survey
Hi Alvesgaspar,
A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 15:19, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]
Share your experience in this survey
Hi Alvesgaspar,
There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 19:57, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
Zodion[edit]
Bonjour, j'aurais besoin de savoir où vous avez pris cette photographie : File:Fly June 2008-6.jpg. Un pays, ou mieux une région, pourrait m'aider. En effet, si elle a été prise au Portugal, la liste des espèces possible est fortement réduite et me permettrait peut-être de l'identifier. D'avance, merci. Bien à vous. ----Abalg (talk) 13:47, 28 October 2019 (UTC) P.S. D'un point de vue général, géoréférencer vos images est nécessaire pour une identification précise des spécimens photographiés.
- Salut, Abalg! It was in Portugal for sure, most probably in Lisbon. I'll try tonight to spot the original and make sure. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:14, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Important message for file movers[edit]
A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.
Possible acceptable uses of this ability:
- To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
- To perform file name swaps.
- When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)
Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.
The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Seville April 2019-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality -- Spurzem 17:57, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Oenothera August 2019-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Seville April 2019-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Smial 22:57, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
|
--QICbot (talk) 06:26, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Seville April 2019-12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Porto April 2019-18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lizard Amsterdam July 2019-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Varanus July 2019-1a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ostrich July 2019-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Porto April 2019-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Berthold Werner 13:23, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ponte Barca Abril 2019-14a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Porto April 2019-7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Porto April 2019-10a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Porto April 2019-13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Porto April 2019-19a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Porto Covo August 2019-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Porto Covo August 2019-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Coimbra April 2018-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mandrill July 2019-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Seville April 2019-25a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Smial 19:08, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Seville April 2019-20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Seville April 2019-9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Coimbra April 2018-13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality -- Spurzem 22:24, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Coimbra April 2018-9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality -- Spurzem 21:02, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Coimbra April 2018-19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Coimbra April 2018-20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Seville April 2019-26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. {{{3}}}
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Seville April 2019-15a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. {{{3}}}
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Seville April 2019-24a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Seville April 2019-13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Seville April 2019-8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Tobias ToMar Maier 22:57, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ponte Barca Abril 2019-5a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Tobias ToMar Maier 22:57, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ponte Lima March 2016-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Coimbra April 2018-26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality -- Spurzem 08:23, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kali April 2017-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good. The picture is small but the subject is large and well photographed. -- Ikan Kekek 19:41, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Coimbra April 2018-17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lizard Amsterdam July 2019-6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Coimbra April 2018-48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ponte Barca Abril 2019-2a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Seven Pandas 00:05, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:09, 9 December 2019 (UTC) |
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ponte Barca Abril 2019-7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Seven Pandas 00:05, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Support Very nice! Good quality. --Steindy 00:10, 9 December 2019 (UTC) |
--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Coimbra December 2011-6b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Coimbra December 2011-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. What is the stripe in the sky on the left side? --Steindy 00:07, 9 December 2019 (UTC) -- There are two of them; telecomunication antennae, I suppose -- Alvesgaspar 09:34, 9 December 2019 (UTC) Support Hmm, thank you. Good quality. --Steindy 12:39, 9 December 2019 (UTC) |
--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Porto April 2019-5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Imehling 16:54, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Porto April 2019-12a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Imehling 16:54, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Porto April 2019-9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Porto April 2019-17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:38, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Paris December 2018-10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Paris December 2018-15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Paris December 2018-11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Porto April 2019-8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Imehling 14:47, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! London July 2015-4bwa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Interesting and difficult perspective, but it is leaning a bit to the right. I know it's a tall building from a small distance so the perspective does not have to be completely straight. Unfortunately the perspective distortion is not in balance. --Michielverbeek 19:11, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Good quality to me, in case this ends up at CR, but I'll gladly await the development of this discussion here first. -- Ikan Kekek 20:57, 13 December 2019 (UTC)  Done New corrected version uploaded -- Alvesgaspar 23:36, 13 December 2019 (UTC) Perspective is more in balance and the quality is good for me --Michielverbeek 07:31, 14 December 2019 (UTC) |
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sesimbra March 2015-2a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Imehling 09:06, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lisboa January 2015-31a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Imehling 09:06, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Moscow July 2011-53.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Imehling 09:06, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Madrid May 2014-86a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Imehling 09:06, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! St John Gijon Washington September 2016-1a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality though it seems a bit too bright especially above. -- Spurzem 19:20, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Santa Cruz March 2016-5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Very good -- Spurzem 19:24, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rendufe March 2016-8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality -- Spurzem 19:25, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bouro March 2016-16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality -- Spurzem 19:26, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Antwerp July 2015-3BW.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support Good quality. Reminiscent of the old school black and white cityscapes of the first half of XX century. The bicycle is a nice touch. The only thing missing here is geotags - can you add them? --Stoxastikos 16:50, 18 December 2019 (UTC) |
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Paris December 2018-20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
Happy holidays 2020![edit]
|
* Happy Holidays 2020, Alvesgaspar! * | |
-- George Chernilevsky talk 14:26, 23 December 2019 (UTC) |
|
File:FP stat 2004-2010 (1).jpg[edit]
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
|
File:FP stat 2004-2010 (1).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:15, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
File:FP stat 2004-2010 (2).jpg[edit]
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
|
|
File:FP stat 2004-2010 (2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:16, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
File:FP stat 2004-2010 (3).jpg[edit]
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
|
|
File:FP stat 2004-2010 (3).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:16, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
File:FP stat 2004-2010 (4).jpg[edit]
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
|
|
File:FP stat 2004-2010 (4).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:17, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
File:The Photographer.jpg[edit]
Hi, Alvesgaspar, I noticed your edit and comparing it with this photograph, it seems like the person is approaching the camera. The position of the grip of the walking stick would not be logical if the person was walking away from the photographer I guess. :-) Lotje (talk) 13:25, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Monsaraz January 2020-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Monsaraz January 2020-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Monsaraz January 2020-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. --Cayambe 07:38, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Porto Covo January 2020-8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Escellent! -- Spurzem 22:33, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Porto Covo January 2020-11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Also very good -- Spurzem 22:35, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Porto Covo January 2020-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Very good composition and good quality -- Spurzem 23:58, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Porto Covo January 2020-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality -- Spurzem 23:59, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Porto Covo January 2020-7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Beautiful image! There are some dust spots and some posterization in the sky; I would suggest to remove them. --Aristeas 11:44, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
Thanks, a new version was uploaded. Alvesgaspar 11:59, 22 February 2020 (UTC) Support Thank you! --Aristeas 15:57, 22 February 2020 (UTC) |
--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Porto Covo January 2020-13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Very good quality -- Spurzem 23:26, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Porto Covo January 2020-17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Porto Covo January 2020-16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Nephrotoma Januray 2020-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Nephrotoma Januray 2020-5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Coimbra April 2018-23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Nephrotoma Januray 2020-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. |
--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
|
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Porto Covo January 2020-11.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Porto Covo January 2020-11.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Porto Covo January 2020-14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Same as the neighbour :) --Podzemnik 02:23, 3 March 2020 (UTC) Done Alvesgaspar 11:23, 3 March 2020 (UTC) Support Thanks for this one too! --Podzemnik 03:26, 10 March 2020 (UTC) |
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Porto Covo January 2020-15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Please a geo location and some local categories (so far there is only "Sea foam") --Podzemnik 02:23, 3 March 2020 (UTC) Done Alvesgaspar 11:23, 3 March 2020 (UTC) Support Thanks --Podzemnik 03:26, 10 March 2020 (UTC) |
--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Hi[edit]
No talk, but still here, and still friend !--2A01:CB04:13:6100:34D2:D3D5:FDE:686D 08:34, 3 October 2020 (UTC) ´did not logg, sorry !--Jebulon (talk) 10:33, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chafer May 2020-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. {{{3}}}
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
paper wasp[edit]
Hello, I found this image on your profile: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wasp_colony.jpg however, are you sure about the species? Currently it is named P. gallicus, but also as Polistes dominula?Garnhami (talk) 08:12, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi Garnhami, At the time I made the shots the two designations either seemed to represent the same species or were the object of a never ending discussion. Maybe 'P. dominula' is now the more accepted name, I'm not sure. Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:36, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
- hello, yeah, maybe that is the reason. It is true that both species are still often mixed up. I am not an expert myself so I hoped you knew more about it since the images are used for both species making it confusing.Garnhami (talk) 18:45, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
- Hello, I don't know why I'm following your user talk page, maybe because I like your quality images... Doesn't matter.
- I think this is Polistes bischoffi (Outside correctly determined illustration) because the female has black genae, predominantly yellow clypeus with black spot in the middle and top of antennas black until the third segment. The female Polistes biglumis is the same except she has predominantly black clypeus (the spot or band in the middle is larger). The female Polistes gallicus has entirely yellow red antennas. Female Polistes dominula has yellow genae, entirely yellow clypeus. Female Polistes nimpha is the same as P. bischoffi, but she has yellow genae. Be careful, determination of male is different (he has yellow frons and yellow greenish eyes). Sorry for my bad english. Have a good day. ----Abalg (talk) 03:59, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
- Hello Alvesgaspar and Garnhami, are you ok if I rename the photography? ----Abalg (talk) 17:06, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
- Hello Alvesgaspar and Abalg I am sadly not expert on these wasps. I am confident it is not P. gallicus. But more is hard to say. Alvesgaspar where did you take the picture? Because perhaps this can already exclude P. bischoffi (as it is very rare in certain areas). I know a table to determine them can be found here: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/257931966_Key_to_the_paper_and_social_wasps_of_Central_Europe_Hymenoptera_Vespidae I am not sure of one of you can try this? I have no time at the moment. Perhaps it is possible to post your picture on a website with experts on wasps? I have noticed that often wrong species are given to certain pictures (sadly) and here I am also doubting about the correctness... But again, not an expert on this particular one. And yes,Alvesgaspar has very good pictures! I am also trying to make lots of pictures from insects, but I do not have the same skills or good camera Alvesgaspar is using. Garnhami (talk) 17:49, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
- Hello Alvesgaspar and Garnhami, are you ok if I rename the photography? ----Abalg (talk) 17:06, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
File:Laura Sauvinet February 2015-1a.jpg[edit]
 |
File:Laura Sauvinet February 2015-1a.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.
The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.
|
User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : JotaCartas.
And also:
- File:Alberto Sousa February 2015-1a.jpg ( Nominator : JotaCartas - Reason : Copyrighted artworks )
- File:Lázaro Lozano February 2015-1a.jpg ( Nominator : JotaCartas - Reason : Copyrighted artworks )
- File:Portela Junior February 2015-1a.jpg ( Nominator : JotaCartas - Reason : Copyrighted artworks )
- File:Celestino Alves February 2015-1a.jpg ( Nominator : JotaCartas - Reason : Copyrighted artworks )
I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 13:11, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
File:Laura Sauvinet February 2015-1a.jpg[edit]
|
|
File:Laura Sauvinet February 2015-1a.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Ymblanter (talk) 15:05, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
File:Portela Junior February 2015-1a.jpg[edit]
|
|
File:Portela Junior February 2015-1a.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Ymblanter (talk) 15:07, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
File:Celestino Alves February 2015-1a.jpg[edit]
|
|
File:Celestino Alves February 2015-1a.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Ymblanter (talk) 15:09, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Happy holidays 2020/2021![edit]
|
* Happy Holidays 2020/2021, Joaquim Alves Gaspar! * | |
-- George Chernilevsky talk 13:54, 23 December 2020 (UTC) |
|
Eagle owl pictures[edit]
Hello Alvesgaspar,
my son is busy with school homework, where he has to make a poster about an animal. He choes the eagle owl. As I knew that Commons nearly always has illustrating material for this kind of endeavour, we came across your eagle owl pictures (e.g. this one). They will surely find some use for us, of course, I'll take care to respect the license. I just wanted to leave you a note and a thank. Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 23:17, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for your attention. Et bonne chance avec le poster! -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:47, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Misidentified image[edit]
misidentified image
Verbascum lychnitis (white form)
Verbascum lychnitis (yellow form)
Hi Alvesgaspar, your image File:Verbascum Helsinki July 2013-1.jpg cannot show Verbascum lychnitis, but some other species from the same genus, because the filament hairs are violet instead of white. Unfortunately, there are numerous species of mullein with violet filament hairs, such as Verbascum nigrum, Verbascum chaixii and many other species. Therefore, I do not think it would be wise to assign a species ID to such an image from a botanical garden. I changed the ID to an unidentified species of Verbascum. Sincerely, --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 17:51, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
POTD Notification[edit]
 |
⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐
The file File:Aveiro March 2012-12.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project. |
|
//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion[edit]
|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:02, 9 June 2021 (UTC)