User talk:Alma

Hallo Alma, willkommen auf den Commons. Schreibst Du bitte noch den Fotografen dazu (also bei eigenen Fotos einfach: "Selbst fotografiert" oder "Fotograf: (Echter Name)" oder "Fotograf: (Benutzername)". Ansonsten ist die Lizenz nicht ganz komplett. Fotos aus deutschen Orten bitte einfach in z. B. Category:Bad Düben, Germany einsortieren. --AndreasPraefcke 17:56, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

Danke für den Hinweis --Alma 18:06, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

Image:Auerbach coat of arms.png

Hallo Steffen, du hast das Wappen von Auerbach zur Schnelllöschung mit dem Vermerk "Double" vorgeschlagen. Ich kann jedoch kein Duplikat finden und das o.g. Image wird auf de: noch verwendet. Ich nehme die Schnelllöschung heraus, du kannst sie wieder eintragen, dann bitte mit dem Namen des Duplikates. Danke. --Raymond de 22:57, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

Mein Fehler: Adorf und Auerbach haben fast identische Wappen, daher kam ich auf Doppelung --Alma 06:11, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

Image:Wappen seifhennersdorf.png

Hallo Alma, ich würde das Bild am besten löschen lassen, weil das Wappen völlig falsch ist. Gruss --62.225.117.54 21:41, 24 February 2006 (UTC) (AHZ)

Stelle neue Version ein, war wohl ein älteres Wappen. --Alma 08:46, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

Image:Kleiner Jasmunder Bodden.PNG

Gut gemeint, aber schau Dir doch mal Image:Kleiner Jasmunder Bodden.png an, das habe ich schon Ende März hochgeladen. Und ich finde das blau schöner als Dein rot ;-) --Sarazyn ^{Got milk?} 09:35, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

Es sei auch auf Category:Maps of Rügen verwiesen. --Sarazyn ^{Got milk?} 10:16, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

Mist ,wieder was umsonst --Alma 10:19, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

Macht doch nichts! Soll ich einen SLA für Deine Version der Karte stellen, oder wollen wir die behalten? (P.S.: Trag Deine Karten bitte künftig auch in die Kategorie ein) --Sarazyn ^{Got milk?} 11:52, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

Schon erledigt, ein "Problem" ist natürlich das die Bodden in der Darßer- Zingster Boddenlandschaft rot gefärbt sind. --Alma 05:30, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

Image:Hafen Zingst.JPG

Dein Einverständis vorausgesetzt habe ich in die die Lizenz GFDL aufgenommen = {{self2|GFDL|cc-by-sa-2.5,2.0,1.0}} gem. de:Wikipedia. --- gildemax 16:13, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

Danke --Alma 17:41, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

Gerne geschehen --gildemax 19:44, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

Image:Wappen roesa.png

Please, see that the coas are carefully packed by alphabetic characters. Venceremos Geograv 14:22, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

???, Ich nix verstähn, was fehlte denn? Do you mean ö directly o and not oe? --Alma 05:58, 31 May 2006 (UTC).

Yes, dett meente ick - immer o statt oe - u statt ue and so on. Geograv 19:35, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

Ja meist denke ich ja dran. --Alma 05:28, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Wappen Weisswasser.PNG

In Bezug auf de:Benutzer Diskussion:32X#Weißwasser/Oberlausitz wollte ich dur nur mitteilen, dass die Änderung jetzt ganz gut aussieht. Da sind zwar noch ein paar JPG-Artefakte, aber vielleicht animieren die ja mal jemanden, eine SVG-Version zu erstellen. Gruß, 32X 13:32, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Hoffe ich auch :-)) --Alma 05:43, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Kotzen_in_Deutschland.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Kotzen_in_Deutschland.png. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. GeorgHH 19:11, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Image:Wappen strehla.png

There's no improvement in quality in the version that's available now compared to the one I reverted to and on the other hand the file's triple the size of my version. Yonatanh 11:25, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Wait a moment, this Version ist not uptodate. --Alma 11:57, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Image:Plech.jpg

Hello

thanks for your uploads

Unfortunetaly, when you uploaded pic in reference, you forgot license and by this way this one runs risk of deletion. Could you tag it with a valid license as your other pics.

friendly Oxam Hartog 23:58, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:Ss george washington.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Ss george washington.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

This is an automated message from User:DRBot. 08:26, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Karte Zwickauerland

Hallo Alma,

ich habe für Langenbernsdorf eine Lagekarte erstellt, dabei habe ich mich farblich an deinen Karten orientiert, desweiteren habe ich aus dem Image:Erlbach kirchberg kreis stollberg.png die kleine Sachsen karte verwendet. Das habe ich auch in die Quellenangabe von meinem Bild geschrieben (siehe http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Zwickauerland_langenbernsdorf.png so sieht es bei wikipedia aus http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Langenbernsdorf) Ich würde jetzt für alle anderen Gemeinden im Zwickauerland das auch machen. Ist das für dich ok? Mit freundlichen Grüße --Ims 13:45, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Na klar mach los. --Alma 06:05, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:Robert the Bruce3.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Robert the Bruce3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Calgacus 18:07, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Zirzipanien 1000.PNG

Hi, you marked Image:Zirzipanien 1000.PNG for deletion but did not give a reason. Can you go back to the image, give a reason, create the subpage and an entry on the deletion log? The steps are on the template. At the moment the image is NOT considered for deletion. Thank you. Deadstar 14:50, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

I need this picture no more. Greetings --Alma 05:43, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:Zirzipanien 1000.PNG

Image deletion warning

Image:Zirzipanien 1000.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

This is an automated message from DRBot 20:13, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Panorama

Versuchs mal mit Autostitch

danke, so was suchte ich. --Alma 10:05, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Hallo, das Pano wird wahrscheinlich noch besser, wenn Du unter Options Scale und Jpeg-Quality auf 100 stellst. System Memory nur so gr0ß, dass noch ein wenig für das laufende System übrig bleibt. Verlustfreies Zuschneiden geht dann noch mit XnView (Per Icon).

Image:Hanse Sail 2004.jpg

Hallo, ich habe mir mal die Freiheit genommen, das Gesicht aus dem Bild rauszuschneiden und ein Information-Template einzufuegen. Kannst du noch das Datum dazuschreiben und gucken ob die Urheberinformationen stimmen? Vielen Dank, --rimshot^talk 11:57, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Ist so in Ordnung. --Alma 11:48, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:Steinbruchmuseum Kö”nigshain.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Steinbruchmuseum Kö”nigshain.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

This is an automated message from DRBot. (Stop bugging me!) 16:49, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:Steinbruchrestloch Kö”nigshain.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Steinbruchrestloch Kö”nigshain.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

This is an automated message from DRBot. (Stop bugging me!) 16:49, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Biathleten

Hallo Alma, du hattest Anfang Januar mehrere Bilder von Biathleten von Flickr hierher geholt. Dabei muß ein FlickrReview-Fehler bei der Datierung unterlaufen sein. Darum hat User:Denniss jetzt Schnelllöschanträge (in meinen Augen massiv übertrieben) gestellt. Es handelt sich um Image:Ricco Gross Biathlet.jpg und Image:Michael Rösch Biathlet.jpg. Schau mal bitte nach, eventuell überprüfe es nochmal. Wäre schade, wenn die Bilder wirklich gelöscht werden. Marcus Cyron 01:48, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Ich habe mal nachgesehen - die Bilder sind nicht im Wikimedia-Sinne frei. Sie dürfen nicht kommerziell genutzt werden, was unseren Richtlinien wiederspricht. Allerdings sagte der Löschantrag was anderes aus. Für Flickr-Bilder nutzt du am Besten Flinfo. Marcus Cyron 13:09, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:Pfaffenstein saxony schwitzerland.jpg

Pay attention to copyright

Image:Pfaffenstein saxony schwitzerland.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.

—LX (talk, contribs) 11:20, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:Ansicht nordseite dom.png

Image deletion warning

Image:Ansicht nordseite dom.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

This is an automated message from DRBot. (Stop bugging me!) 15:45, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Image deletion warning :-)

Schick, hast du die Kirche auch einmal von außen in voller Größe drauf? Das Gerüst war ja weg, wenn ich mich letztes Mal nicht verguckt habe. --Niteshift (talk) 15:57, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Ich glaube schon, es wird wohl bald einen Artikel geben, Bilder und Quellen habe ich genug. --Alma (talk) 05:27, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Image:Mark lausitz 1000.PNG

Image deletion warning

Image:Mark lausitz 1000.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

This is an automated message from DRBot. (Stop bugging me!) 23:17, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Bitte Löschantrags-Bausteine nicht selbst entfernen, noch dazu. Das dürfen nur Administratoren, wenn sie die Entscheidung zum jeweilen Antrag treffen. Eigenes Entfernen zählt als Vandalismus. Da du ja nur den Hinweis auf den Löschantrag entfernt hast, den Löschantrag selbst aber nicht verschwinden lassen hast, hast du durch deine Handlungsweise nur anderen Benutzern die Chance genommen, sich zum Thema zu äußern, da sie nicht wussten, dass das Bild in Gefahr war und es ahnungslos weiternutzten. -- Cecil (talk) 11:36, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

O.K. --Alma (talk) 14:06, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Wappen lubmin.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Wappen lubmin.png. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Sdrtirs (talk) 19:20, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Wismarer Bucht Karten

Hi, ich lösche die Bilder nur sehr sehr ungerne. Gewöhnlich werden alte Bilder nicht gelöscht, da es aber dein ausdrücklicher Wunsch zu sein scheint werde ich dem mal nachkommen. --Martin H. (talk) 17:46, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Verstehe ich. Die Karten waren in dem Fall eine Notlösung, die jetzt einer guten Lösung (sprich neuen Karte) zugeführt wurde. Danke --Alma (talk) 10:25, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

User:Alma/MyLicenseTemplateScan

Hi! I created a new category Category:Taken with Canon PowerShot A430 for photographs taken with Canon PowerShot A430 digital camera. Please, could you modify your template User:Alma/MyLicenseTemplateScan to point to the new category instead of Category:Canon PowerShot A430 which is inteded for photographs of Canon PowerShot A430. Thank you! (I could, of course, modify the template myself, too, but I consider it better not to modify your templates without your permission.) --Apalsola ^{t • c} 19:17, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

I modified the template myself. I hope, you don't mind. Best regards, --Apalsola ^{t • c} 13:16, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for your effort. --Alma (talk) 17:46, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Alma!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:37, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

• Image:Wappen-muldenstein.png is uncategorized since 17 April 2009.
• Image:Wappen groebern.png is uncategorized since 28 May 2009.
• Image:Karte Landschaftschutzgebiet Böhmisches Paradies.PNG was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.

Bilderwunsch

Hallo Alma,

Dein Bild: Sonnenaufgang bei Helmsrade am See auf http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dobbertiner_See würde der "Bundesverband verweister Eltern in Deutschland e.V." ([www.veid.de]) gern für seinen Flyer (Auflage 10.000 Stück für die nächsten 2 Jahre) sowie für die Website nutzen wollen. Ich habe dafür ehreamtlich den Flyer entworfen und könnten ihn Dir nach Kontaktaufnahme gern per Mail zusenden: [redaktion@leuchtturmleuchten.de]

Es wäre eine schöne Geste, wenn wir die Datei nutzen dürften. Über eine schnelle Rückantwort würde ich mich sehr freuen.

Viele Grüße

File:Arta Mallorca 2006.JPG

Hallo Alma, weißt du noch, von wo aus Du dieses Bild aufgenommen hast? Aus der Perspektive schließe ich, es müsste etwa von der Kirche Transfiguració del Senyor aus sein, also mit in Category:Views from Transfiguració del Senyor (Artà) gehören. Kannst Du das bestätigen? Grüße, -- Ies (talk) 17:00, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Korrekt. --Alma (talk) 18:07, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

File:2010 Wildparkhundshaupten 2.JPG

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 15:21, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

File:2010 Guestrow Stadtansicht.JPG

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 07:18, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Gipfelbucheintrag Fritz Wiessner.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 13:54, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Marienkirche stargard.JPG

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Marienkirche stargard.JPG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Cecil (talk) 17:57, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

Wappen_Heringsdorf

I'll try to make a vector version. The original was quite small and I'm not really sure about details such as: Should the edges of the waves be uniformly thick and solid color? What exactly is the color of the contour of the waves and of the crown? If there is a better source for these colors and shapes, I could use the input.

Gregors (talk) 14:09, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

I made an svg but could not upload it using "derivatveFX" [1] (which is my usual method) because there are no licenses attributed to the file Wappen heringsdorf.PNG. I see that there are permissions which I would term as being sufficient to overrule any licences but I don't know why deriviativeFX does not think them satisfactory...

The procedure for uploading original files also requires licence information and, as this IS a derivative work, I don't want to claim that it is my own work.

Gregors (talk) 14:59, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Excuise me, perhelion had created a new coat of arm. Please see also WikiProjekt_Wappen#Wappen_Gemeinde_Heringsdorf. Thanks for your efforts. --Alma (talk) 08:41, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

File:2012 Kirche Karow Friedhofskapelle.JPG

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 08:37, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

File:2012 Insel Ahrendsberg.JPG

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 15:44, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Re: Falsche Bezeichnung

Done and thank you for spotting the error:). Cheerio Hoodinski (talk) 10:16, 18 January 2013 (UTC) Also thanks for the quickly correction. --Alma (talk) 13:27, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Darstellung der Belagerung.jpg

File:Darstellung der Belagerung.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 07:26, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Foto: Wikipedia

Zur Kenntnis: Dresdner stürzt vom Felsen: 31-Jähriger fällt am Rauenstein in fünf Meter tiefe Spalte. Grüße --X-Weinzar (talk) 11:50, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Danke. --Alma (talk) 15:57, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

File:2013 Jumeirah Emirates Towers Hotel Dubai.JPG

File:2013 Jumeirah Emirates Towers Hotel Dubai.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cqui (talk) 14:31, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Karte Kloster Dobbertin.jpg

File:Karte Kloster Dobbertin.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Archer90 (talk) 16:03, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Photographer's Barnstar

Hallo, wir möchten darüber informieren, dass wir Dein/Ihr Bild (Wiki-Commons) zum Blick auf den Oybin und die Lausche / Scharfenstein (DE) - selbstverständlich inklusive der Copyright-Hinweise und Urheber-Angaben - in unserem nicht-kommerziellen Projekt << FVKS-Kalender "Unterwegs" 2014 >> zum Thema „Ausblicke" verwenden. >> http://www.kalender.fvks.eu >> http://kalender.fvks.eu/2014/02/03/blick-auf-den-oybin-und-die-lausche-scharfenstein-de/ Wir hoffen, alles korrekt umgesetzt zu haben. Der Kalender begleitet auch unseren im Jahr 2014 laufenden Fotowettbewerb (fotowettbewerb.fvks.eu), ebenfalls zum Thema „Ausblicke". Grüsse FVKS - Förderverein Kulturstadt Görlitz-Zgorzelec e.V. kalender@fvks.eu, Agata, Cornelia, Matthias fvks (talk) 14:29, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Danke. Es ist mir eine Ehre. --Alma (talk) 10:53, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Dobbertiner See 2008.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dobbertiner See 2008.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

File:2013 Jumeirah Emirates Towers Dubai.JPG

File:2013 Jumeirah Emirates Towers Dubai.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ras67 (talk) 14:47, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Files which should be renamed

Hi, can you change the names of files?

This 2 photos:

• 
• 

This is not "Chapelle Notre-Dame de Foncourrieu". Can you change the name to "Chapelle des Pénitents de Marcillac-Vallon"?

Thanks, Tournasol7 (talk) 13:11, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

That's not my picture. Please contac the photographer. --Alma (talk) 11:22, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Important message for file movers

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

• To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
• To perform file name swaps.
• When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Wappen laussig.png

File:Wappen laussig.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Schlosser67 (talk) 13:15, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

File:Wappen Oppach.PNG

File:Wappen Oppach.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Glorious 93 (talk) 10:47, 19 May 2021 (UTC)