User talk:LX

Welcome to the user talk page for LX!

Are you responding to a message that I left on your user talk page? Please respond there.

Continuing discussions where they started makes them easier to follow. If I wrote something on your talk page, I should have it on my watch list. (If I seem to have overlooked a response, you may remind me here.) If you write something here and expect a response, expect it here (so watch this page).

Sign your posts by typing four tilde characters (~~~~). If you want to start a new discussion on a new topic, place your post at the bottom of the page under == A descriptive heading ==. Please be civil, assume good faith and avoid personal attacks. (See the talk page guidelines.)

Archived discussions are in User talk:LX/Archive.

File tagging File:CP Hôpital d'Apt.gif

This discussion has been moved back to User talk:Marianne Casamance#File tagging File:CP Hôpital d'Apt.gif. Please respect my request to keep discussions where they started. Don't continue discussions from elsewhere on this page, as this makes discussions harder to follow. Thank you. —LX (talk, contribs) 08:14, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Mr. Austin

Re:Commons:Help_desk#How_to_add_pubic_image_to_my_page: I agree with your prognosis. Especially the place where he lapsed into first person in writing about himself. Perhaps I should just have let Ruslik's original answer stand, but it seemed a bit too snarky for the help page. - Jmabel ! talk 01:20, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Yeah, I think we agree that if one has nothing helpful to say, it's better to say nothing at all. I might have been tempted to throw in a tongue-in-cheek reference to Commons:Nudity#New uploads in reference to the obvious typo, but not without any help on the real issue. Of course, sometimes (quite often, it seems) the helpful thing to say is "you can't/shouldn't do what you want to do." Cheers, —LX (talk, contribs) 09:55, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Homenaje a Chapecoense en Girardot (31345909675).jpg

and File:Homenaje a Chepecoense en Girardot (31309711716).jpg.

Hi, Since these files were reviewed, and a previous DR was kept, I think that a proper DR is better. In particular, the reviewer(s) and the closing admin(s) should be informed. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:45, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Yes, if I'd noticed the previous deletion discussion, I would have taken that route. Cheers, —LX (talk, contribs) 10:48, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Use Google Transltate

Te voy a hablar en español. Evita mensajes como este que consideran mis contribuciones de mala fe. Solo fueron dos imágenes que un usuario de Wikipedia en Español me solicitó subir, creyendo que estaban con licencia Creative Commons. Te reportaré a los administradores por las agresiones en mi contra. Que @Yann: también sepa. --Gastón Cuello (talk) 13:50, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Fue un error de la Agencia ANDES, no mío, pues en Flickr aún figura con licencia CC. Soy usuario hace 4 años y entiendo bien de las normas. Ese mensaje me hirió mucho, pues no soy novato. --Gastón Cuello (talk) 13:59, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

I agree that Agencia de Noticias ANDES made the more serious mistake, as they really should know better. You made a smaller mistake in trusting them (and perhaps overlooking the description). I think that's quite understandable, which is why I took the time to write a personal note to explain what was going on instead of just the template notices. I don't know why you feel like I've been aggressive, and I'm sorry you feel that way. That certainly wasn't my intention. —LX (talk, contribs) 14:25, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Indian Navy Image help

Hey, I noticed the discussion we had on the last Indian Navy image deletion and wanted to ensure that I did this one right. I uploaded a new image to Wikimedia commons, File:Tropex 2017.jpg and added the Indian navy license to it. How do I go about requesting an immediate license review on this? Thanks for all your help. Adamgerber80 (talk) 20:37, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

You already have requested review. By using {{Indian navy}} (rather than a generic cc-by tag), the file is placed in Category:Unreviewed photos from indiannavy.nic.in to be reviewed by a license reviewer or administrator. Since those resources are limited, that may not happen "immediately", but your upload will get the same priority as the rest. One thing you can do is to visit https://archive.org/, enter the source URL, and if it's not already archived, click the "Save this url in the Wayback Machine" on the resulting page. That should enable license review even if the source link goes dead. —LX (talk, contribs) 20:54, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Got it. I will archive it right way and keep this in mind for the future. Sorry for any trouble. Adamgerber80 (talk) 02:12, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

No trouble. —LX (talk, contribs) 11:06, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Upphovsrättsfråga

Hej! Filen med detta verk innehåller en hänvisning till denna sida där det står: "Det här verket har identifierats som fritt från kända upphovsrättsliga restriktioner, inklusive alla relaterade närstående rättigheter." Men, det står också bland annat "Detta verk är kanske inte fritt från kända upphovsrättsliga restriktioner i alla jurisdiktioner." Skulle du bedöma att verket är fritt och kan laddas upp på Commons? Edaen (talk) 11:15, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Upphovsrättsinnehavaren dog 1926, vilket innebär att upphovsrätten i Sverige är utgången sedan 1 januari 1997. För att kunna laddas upp på Commons måste även upphovsrätten i USA vara utgången. Reglerna för detta är mer komplicerade. Verket är publicerat efter 1922 och publicerades sannolikt inte i USA i samband med den ursprungliga publiceringen. Under de förutsättningarna är den avgörande frågan om verket var upphovsskyddat i Sverige den 1 januari 1996. Eftersom så är fallet är verket upphovsskyddat i USA 95 år från publicering. Det innebär att det bör vara möjligt att ladda upp det här den 1 januari 2022. Det är i alla fall min lekmannatolkning. —LX (talk, contribs) 15:33, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Tack! Som du säger är det komplicerat. Eftersom det ändå är släppt under en fri licens fick jag förhoppningar. Edaen (talk) 20:05, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Jepp. Det här verket hamnade dessutom precis på "fel" sida om gränsen. Hade författaren dött bara ett år tidigare hade situationen varit helt annorlunda. —LX (talk, contribs) 20:10, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Rw: Etiquetado de la imagen [[File:Jesús Ortega Irusta.jpg]]

Saludos. Lamento no saber inglés, le escribo en español. En la página web citada se dice literalmente:

Política de licenciamiento. Los textos editados en EcuRed se hacen públicos con posibilidades de ser copiados, reproducidos modificados y/o distribuidos libremente sin fines comerciales aplicándose las mismas condiciones a cualquier trabajo derivado de él. Esta licencia es de carácter no exclusivo, irrevocable, sin límites territoriales y sin cobro de regalías u otros derechos. Estas condiciones son compatibles con la licencia copyleft Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial ShareAlike.

Que, a su vez, enlaza con esta página. Supongo que con esto es suficiente. Gracias. Macarrones (talk) 12:49, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

No, that is not enough, for several reasons. Firstly, only the legitimate copyright holder can issue a valid copyright license, and there is no evidence that the file in question was uploaded to ecured.cu by the legitimate copyright holder. Secondly, content restricted to {{noncommercial}} use is not allowed on Commons. Please read Commons:Project scope/Summary/es to understand what you can and cannot upload here. —LX (talk, contribs) 22:28, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Note

This discussion has been moved back to User talk:Stikkyy#File:Ancistrolepis grammatus from the Nishinomiya Shell Museum, Nishinomiya, Japan. © Vendetti, Jann.jpg. Please respect my request to keep discussions where they started. Don't continue discussions from elsewhere on this page, as this makes discussions harder to follow. Thank you. —LX (talk, contribs) 17:32, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Panoramio bot operator

I opened a complaint about User:Shizhao and his Panoramio uploads at the Administrators' noticeboard. You are invited to share your personal experience and opinion about this user and his abuse of his bot operator rights. Thanks, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 10:09, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

US government Flickr streams license

Hi there,

Saw a couple notices on my talk page regarding a few files I uploaded from a USFWS Flickr stream that, it would seem, they do not own, and which they changed the license from something incompatible with Commons. Disappointing, but oh well. I'd like to suggest, however, that you group these into a single deletion nomination. Was it just a single other Flickr stream it copied from that was incompatible? (I haven't dug very deep yet) — Rhododendrites ^talk |  18:33, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi Rhododendrites! I probably would have started a mass deletion request if I'd come across them at the same time. I'm doing some searching for "by-nc" on file description pages, and these were just kind of scattered throughout. I recall coming across a few similar ones a while back; see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Poem by Spencer (8661671558).jpg and the others linked from there.

Searching for "by-nc" in pages mentioning 50838842@N06 or usfwshq, it looks like there are at least about 40 of these government copyright violations, all from various sources. (There's also one "by-nd", File:Ceratotherium simum simum (29645910396).jpg.) Seeing as a few of them have been uploaded by you, perhaps you could help go through those search results? —LX (talk, contribs) 19:25, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

I just tried searching for ' "by-nc" rhododendrites ' and returned 17 hits. Is best practice to assume that if the description includes an incompatible license (one which conflicts with the license attached to the image via Flickr), that it should be deleted? Seems that way to me, but perhaps technically it's only required if it can be verified it was published with that license? (seems similar to the question of what happens if I publish an image on Flickr with a CC-BY, but in the text I write "CC-BY-NC" -- obviously since in this case the image was created by someone else it's different, but the process seems similar). — Rhododendrites ^talk |  19:37, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

I've nominated a handful of files for deletion where the photo appeared to be the uploader's own work, but where they provided statements in the description contradicting the machine readable license. (Obviously, I wouldn't nominate files that were deliberately multi-licensed.) This applies both to files uploaded directly here or transferred from Flickr. They pretty much always get deleted unless the uploader is willing to waive the noncommercial and nonderivative restrictions. —LX (talk, contribs) 19:47, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Big Bang wins MTV EMA award.jpg

This discussion has been moved back to User talk:Amber19950120#Please do not recreate deleted content. Please respect my request to keep discussions where they started. Don't continue discussions from elsewhere on this page, as this makes discussions harder to follow. Thank you. —LX (talk, contribs) 05:22, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Re: dragonfly crops; Thank you

Hi LX, many thanks for your improvements to the licencing section of the two cropped images. I was not sure how I should format the licences, so your example makes the process very clear. I will follow this example in future as it makes the source quite clear for others to understand. I am sorry I made it difficult for you! Summerdrought (talk) 22:05, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Cheers, no worries. Just glad we got it all worked out. —LX (talk, contribs) 05:38, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Typical anti-Semitic Swede

You Swedes are anti-Semitic Eurotrash filth who want to destroy Israel and hate Jews with a passion. Enjoy your sharia law, you dhimmi faggot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HuldraTheArabSupremacistBoiledAlive (talk • contribs) 20:13, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Your choice of insults say a lot more about you than they do about me. —LX (talk, contribs) 20:20, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

I see you have met my old friend.....Thanks for cleaning up on my talk page! Now you can expect interesting new users, with names starting with LX.....Huldra (talk) 20:26, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Regarding Special:AbuseFilter/180

The filter currently means: if you're new and you're uploading one of the disallowed file types, warn you, but if you insist the filter will let you pass. None of the conditions mentions WP0, and it is bypass-able. CC @Steinsplitter, Jdx:. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 09:03, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

FoP in Sweden

Thank you for your concern here: [1]. Just want to assure you that I am not very distressed for my own sake. I just think it is very clear there is no FoP in Sweden, and therefore they cannot stay uploaded to Commons. In order to change that we should politely obey the rule on Commons but be more active lobbying. If we do not acknowledge the ruling, there is no ruling to change and we are fine with the fact that pictures from Commons depicting artwork may be subject to fee when used on Swedish websites. Såg att du är svensk nu, hoppas min engelska är begriplig.--LittleGun (talk) 20:10, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Jag håller med om att läget ser dystert ut. Enda hoppet som jag ser det står till överklagande, men eftersom grundproblemet är HD:s yttrande så förefaller det osannolikt att högre instans skulle komma till något annat beslut. För stunden har jag styrt upp Category:Swedish FOP cases, uppdaterat Commons:Freedom of panorama#Sweden och föreslagit omformulering av {{FoP-Sweden}}. —LX (talk, contribs) 20:30, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Mexico Real Cafe Brighton Location Picture

This discussion has been moved back to User talk:Lorenru#File:Mexico Real Cafe location Brighton UK.jpg. Please respect my request to keep discussions where they started. Don't continue discussions from elsewhere on this page, as this makes discussions harder to follow. Thank you. —LX (talk, contribs) 18:20, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

FoP byggnader

Among the pictures you've tagged with the new template, there are some which are either too old to protected such as File:Björktorpsskolan, Nyfors västra skola.JPG or are not sufficiently original like File:Brottsta, Stensättarvägen, Tunnbindarvägen höger.JPG or File:Barnens reptilhus, Parken Zoo.JPG. Edaen (talk) 20:00, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

All the files were already tagged as depictions of copyrighted works using {{FoP-Sweden}}. I didn't add this tag to any files today. In most cases, I believe the tags were added by the uploaders. Two days ago, I reworded the template, as discussed at Commons:Village pump/Copyright#Freedom of panorama in Sweden (or lack thereof). As you suggested there, I also added the possibility to separate between artworks and buildings. All I did today was to set the new parameter to building for the files that appeared to depict buildings out of the first 500 or so in Category:FoP-Sweden. All that does is to remove the text "or work of art" and change the category from Category:FoP-Sweden to Category:FoP-Sweden (buildings).

I'm not sure what it is you're asking me to do. Not touch a single file unless I've verified that all tags are correct, including researching architects not named in the file descriptions and questioning the uploaders' judgement on the threshold of originality of buildings in Sweden (which I don't think is very well established – it's not really been an issue before)? Sorry, not going to happen. Refrain from working on creating the separation you suggested? I guess I'll do that if my work is not appreciated. Of course, the result will be that the files are even more likely to be swept up in mass deletions. —LX (talk, contribs) 20:32, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Sorry. I didn't see that you just changed the parameter. Edaen (talk) 20:37, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Copyright Watcher Barnstar
	For your help in dealing with WP0 abuse and others. Yann (talk) 15:17, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Considering the known side effects of the filter, it's good to see that at least it also seems to be doing its job. They're all angry and confused like hornets kicked out of their nest. Let's hope they get the message eventually. —LX (talk, contribs) 18:37, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

No subject

This discussion has been moved back to Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Desprez37. Please respect my request to keep discussions where they started. Don't continue discussions from elsewhere on this page, as this makes discussions harder to follow. Thank you. —LX (talk, contribs) 14:18, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

No subject

This discussion has been moved back to User talk:Շաքէ Մանկասարեան#File tagging File:Haroutioun Vartabed Bezdigian BEZDIKIAN P. Jacques.jpg. Please respect my request to keep discussions where they started. Don't continue discussions from elsewhere on this page, as this makes discussions harder to follow. Thank you. —LX (talk, contribs) 12:17, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Thank you

	Thank you
	Thank you The photo from his own camera Շաքէ Մանկասարեան (talk) 16:31, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

I'm not sure what you're trying to say or what this is in reference to. You're welcome, I guess. —LX (talk, contribs) 16:35, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Use Google Translator

This discussion has been moved back to User talk:TheRealWII2D#Copyright violations. Please respect my request to keep discussions where they started. Don't continue discussions from elsewhere on this page, as this makes discussions harder to follow. Thank you. —LX (talk, contribs) 17:43, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Flickr review

Why? Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:00, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Hi Jon, and sorry about this! I've been tagging a lot of unreviewed files from Flickr using VisualFileChange. I've done my best to deselect files that have already been reviewed using appropriate regular expressions. Obviously this one slipped through, probably because it used {{LicenseReview}} rather than {{flickrreview}} or one of the FlickreviewR user namespace tags, and I guess I missed it when reviewing manually. I'll add a few points to my checklists, so thanks for pointing this out, and sorry again for the trouble. —LX (talk, contribs) 20:11, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

No worries :) Keep up the good work! Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:13, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Flickr2Commons

This discussion has been moved back to User talk:Aditya Kabir#‎Files uploaded from Flickr. Please respect my request to keep discussions where they started. Don't continue discussions from elsewhere on this page, as this makes discussions harder to follow. Thank you. —LX (talk, contribs) 09:35, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Categories help

Hello,

I was wondering if you could give me some tips for adding categories to my photo's. Thanks in advance!

Sincerely, NeoMeesje (talk) 21:47, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Commons:Categories covers it pretty well, especially Commons:Categories#Categorization tips. Keep in mind that categories are not tags, but a hierarchical structure. Explore the categories to see if its parent categories, contents and description (if any) match the files you want to add and if there are more suitable subcategories. Try to be as specific as possible, and avoid over-categorization. —LX (talk, contribs) 23:45, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Vandalism

The IP here has not made any vandalism, has simply opened a DR in a civic manner. There is no harm in discussing anything. OTOH I avoid calling "vandalism" any edits by established users, therefore will only tell you not to close "hastily" any discussion, please, so that people will not feel bitten, other than for usual reasons. Cheers. --E4024 (talk) 08:56, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

I believe I explained very clearly in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Muslim depiction of Muhammad - 17th century Ottoman copy from the "Edinburgh codex".jpg why re-nominations that do nothing but repeat invalid reasons of the previous 23+ discussions are considered disruptive. Commons:Deletion requests#Appealing decisions also states that users should refrain from re-nominating files for deletion without raising new points. Make no mistake: the drive-by IPs that are nominating these files for deletion are not looking for a discussion; they're simply hell-bent on erasing cultural heritage. —LX (talk, contribs) 10:19, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Vandalism 2

You marked some images, uploaded by me, for speedy deletion, and forgot to mention reason. When I write to the admins to warn you for vandalism, I will not forget to state the reason.--Алый Король (talk) 16:52, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

• As expected, I needed to open a history of edits to understand your perverted thinking"The Flickr user is not the copyright holder and therefore cannot issue a valid license" so who is copyright holder, Maybe you? Or somewhere there is a rule that an organization can not be the copyright holder, or we are rignt now in LXpedia and live by your rules?--Алый Король (talk) 16:56, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Just so you know, for obvious reasons, I'm not going to dignify this with a response. —LX (talk, contribs) 21:32, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Flickrvio to DR

Hi LX, I've taken the liberty to convert 3 of your flickrvio-tags to regular DR: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Perry Anderson.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Manuel Castells.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Wang Hui.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 20:16, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Fair enough. Commented there. Cheers, —LX (talk, contribs) 21:43, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Chasing copyvio

copyvio

For this chase of a bad uploader which eventually resulted in destruction of a sockpuppet ring. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 23:15, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Incnis Mrsi: Thank you! —LX (talk, contribs) 11:10, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

By the way, don’t you want to apply for a sysop’s cap on this site? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 18:32, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Incnis Mrsi: No, it's been more than eight years since I resigned, but the situation is still the same. It's not like there's a shortage of work that can be handled by non-admins, though. —LX (talk, contribs) 18:57, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Could you look at Commons:Blockers, please? I created a draft policy which can mitigate legal concerns for you. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 15:28, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

Umaid Mubarak

This discussion has been moved back to User talk:Usamasaad#File tagging File:Umaid Madhat Mubarak.jpg. Please respect my request to keep discussions where they started. Don't continue discussions from elsewhere on this page, as this makes discussions harder to follow. Thank you. —LX (talk, contribs) 19:52, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

File:الفنانة فريال العمري.jpg

This discussion has been moved back to User talk:Usamasaad#File:الفنانة فريال العمري.jpg. Please respect my request to keep discussions where they started. Don't continue discussions from elsewhere on this page, as this makes discussions harder to follow. Thank you. —LX (talk, contribs) 19:57, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Portuguese Colonial War

This discussion has been moved back to User talk:Filósofo Lusófono#Copyright violations. Please respect my request to keep discussions where they started. Don't continue discussions from elsewhere on this page, as this makes discussions harder to follow. Thank you. —LX (talk, contribs) 20:04, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

License and GoogleMap/Earth

This discussion has been moved back to User talk:Parisinyou#File:Fontaine wallace.jpg. Please respect my request to keep discussions where they started. Don't continue discussions from elsewhere on this page, as this makes discussions harder to follow. Thank you. —LX (talk, contribs) 06:02, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

User:Meethi19

Hi LX. I'm posting this here since you had previously warned this editor at User talk:Meethi19#Copyright violations about uploading copyvios back in May 2016, but they do not seem to have taken your advice and have had multiple files deleted as copyvios since that time. I just tagged File:Trishnatheband.jpg as a copyvio since it was taken from Facebook. I was going to warn the editor again, but I'm not sure if that will have any effect, so I'd figured I'd discuss the situation with you instead. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:01, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

Hi Marchjuly! I would have hoped that at least one of the administrators that deleted the copyright violations uploaded after the "final" warning that I gave in May would have blocked the uploader, but I guess administrators either no longer take the time to look into the uploaders when clearing out Category:Copyright violations, or they don't think serial copyright violators are a big deal, or both. It might be time to put in a request at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Blocks and protections. —LX (talk, contribs) 06:43, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

Followed your suggestion and posted at COM:AN/B#User:Meethi19. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:26, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

COM:AN/U

---

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#User Pipenavis. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrew J.Kurbiko (talk • contribs) 13:23, 12 March 2018‎ (UTC)

Deletion requests/Files uploaded by El Venado Yucateco

This discussion has been moved back to Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by El Venado Yucateco. Please respect my request to keep discussions where they started. Don't continue discussions from elsewhere on this page, as this makes discussions harder to follow. Thank you. —LX (talk, contribs) 17:23, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Note

	Note
	I just want to edit in Wikipedia and put images to the articles that do not have them please understand. Etid22 (talk) 21:24, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Sol-lol: Uploading copyright violations is not allowed. Forging license reviews is not allowed. Abusing multiple accounts is not allowed. Block evasion is not allowed. You have been blocked from editing and uploading for doing all of these things. Any new accounts you create will be identified and blocked. Stop creating new accounts and find another hobby somewhere else. Please understand that you are not welcome on this site. Bye, —LX (talk, contribs) 08:17, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

Need your help!

Hi LX, After you instructed me better about the images of vase paintings, I went back through all of my uploads and nominated the ones I think may be in violation of copyright for the same reason. I couldn't see any instruction anywhere for how to delete a file I uploaded, so I just hit the nominate for deletion link and gave this reason for why it should be deleted: I mistakenly thought this was a 2-D work of art (because it's a painting) but now I understand it's a 3-D work of art (because it's a vase). Please Delete this so I won't be in violation of a copyright law!

I hope you will be able to help me get those files deleted. I really don't like to make such an embarrassing mistake, but now I must clean up my mess, and I'll be way more careful in the future.

Aisha AishaAbdel (talk) 01:40, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

AishaAbdel: I only wish everyone would be as responsive and proactive as you! Only administrators can delete files. Using the nominate for deletion link to start a deletion discussion is generally the appropriate way to request deletion. For files that you uploaded less than seven days ago, you could alternatively add {{SDG7}} to request speedy deletion instead. Deletion discussions are typically processed after 7–10 days, while speedy deletions are typically processed within a day. —LX (talk, contribs) 17:29, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Duplicate file

Hi LX, I want to delete this (Duplicate) page [File:شرح الرسالة الشمسية في القواعد المنطقية 96.jpg] because a mistake , i up lode it again in this page [File:شرح الرسالة الشمسية في القواعد المنطقية 97.jpg], thanks.Usamasaad 15:16, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Usamasaad: You can use {{duplicate}} to mark duplicate files for deletion (follow the link for information on how to use the template). By the way, are you really the author and copyright holder of this text? —LX (talk, contribs) 15:55, 23 March 2018 (UTC).

thank you. Do you mean the text of the old Manuscript!? Of course not. The scribe mentioned that he wrote this book in Baghdad in 1633.Usamasaad 16:16, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Usamasaad: Then it looks like you have some corrections to make to the file description of this and every other file in the batch. —LX (talk, contribs) 16:23, 23 March 2018 (UTC).

Thank you. ..Usamasaad 16:25, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Usamasaad: In an earlier version of the reply, you asked what to do. Here is what you need to do, specifically:

1. Provide correct copyright information: {{PD-old-100-1923}} or similar, rather than {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}}.
2. Provide correct authorship information: Najm al-Dīn al-Qazwīnī al-Kātibī/نجم الدين الكاتبي القزويني (right?), rather than Usamasaad.
3. Provide correct source information: the address of the web page where you got it from, or {{Scan}} if you scanned it yourself.

—LX (talk, contribs) 16:43, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Ok, I will put {{PD-old-100-1923}} , {{Scan}}, and the name to the owner of the books (Mullah Qasim Effendi Al-Arim Al-Ani/ ar:قاسم أفندي المفتي) or the authorship information: Najm al-Dīn al-Qazwīnī al-Kātibī/نجم الدين الكاتبي القزويني . Usamasaad 19:33, 23 March 2018 (UTC).

please see this files in this (Category:Explanation of Isagoge book).Usamasaad 19:37, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked soon

This discussion has been moved back to User talk:GabrielVelasquez#Copyright violations. Please respect my request to keep discussions where they started. Don't continue discussions from elsewhere on this page, as this makes discussions harder to follow. Thank you. —LX (talk, contribs) 11:20, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Altair Jarabo.png

This discussion has been moved back to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Altair Jarabo.png. Please respect my request to keep discussions where they started. Don't continue discussions from elsewhere on this page, as this makes discussions harder to follow. Thank you. —LX (talk, contribs) 16:48, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Food

Hello! After the successful pilot program by Wikimedia India in 2015, Wiki Loves Food (WLF) is happening again in 2018 and this year, we are going International. To make this event a grand success, your direction is key. Please sign up as a volunteer or sign up on behalf of your affiliate here.--Abhinav619 (talk) 05:59, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Deletion of File:Telegram-messenger-screenshot.png

hai, i recently see your deletion request of my uppload File:Telegram-messenger-screenshot.png. can i know why is that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abijith k.a (talk • contribs) 06:08, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Abijith k.a (talk) 06:08, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

The reason is stated in the template on the file description page and on Commons:Deletion requests/File:Telegram-messenger-screenshot.png, where the deletion discussion is taking place. —LX (talk, contribs) 17:05, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

File:1st TNA KO title belt.jpg

This discussion has been moved back to User talk:Homey104#File:1st TNA KO title belt.jpg. Please respect my request to keep discussions where they started. Don't continue discussions from elsewhere on this page, as this makes discussions harder to follow. Thank you. —LX (talk, contribs) 07:12, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Good job

Good catch, LX, I have marked it for deletion: "Unless this issue is resolved, the file will be deleted seven days after this tag was added (19 June 2018)." --Taterian (talk) 19:52, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

How can we fix this? some other option? can you advice me? { 07/01/2018)

To, LX,

Hope you can suggest, and how can we fix? let me know what others option? And let me know what other possibility you can suggest this? Thanks for your time. . .

From Bienvenido Bones

-07/01/2018- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bienvenido Bones Banez, Jr. (talk • contribs) 21:23, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

I assume "this" refers to the discussions taking place at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Bienvenido Bones and Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Paintings by Bienvenido Bones. You would need to explain (in those discussions) why the content in question is within the project scope of Wikimedia Commons (especially considering that your attempts at writing about yourself were rejected at English Wikipedia). It would help if your arguments were more succinct and coherent than your previous one. You would also need to correct the source, authorship and copyright information for all the content you didn't create yourself, and you would need to obtain and submit copyright permissions from all copyright holders using the procedure described at Commons:OTRS. —LX (talk, contribs) 07:09, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

File:IOV Busonera.jpg

This discussion has been moved back to User talk:Leofbrj#File:IOV Busonera.jpg. Please respect my request to keep discussions where they started. Don't continue discussions from elsewhere on this page, as this makes discussions harder to follow. Thank you. —LX (talk, contribs) 19:31, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

File :Tekka Raja Badshah Inter Title.jpg

This discussion has been moved back to User talk:Ekramul 56#File:Tekka Raja Badshah Inter Title.jpg. Please respect my request to keep discussions where they started. Don't continue discussions from elsewhere on this page, as this makes discussions harder to follow. Thank you. —LX (talk, contribs) 19:39, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Regarding copyright lisences

This discussion has been moved back to User talk:SprayCanToothpick#Copyright violations. Please respect my request to keep discussions where they started. Don't continue discussions from elsewhere on this page, as this makes discussions harder to follow. Thank you. —LX (talk, contribs) 08:15, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

A Barnstar For You!

		The Copyright inspector Barnstar
		For your long term work on copyright status inspection, and your guidance and assistance in File:Shanghai Pudong International Airport 1.jpg!廣九直通車 (talk) 10:58, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

廣九直通車: Thank you for your kind words. I also addressed the similar issue with File:Airport Expwy TollGate.jpg. Here are a few hints that you might helpful in tracking down the source information for files like this:

• In most cases, you can assume the file had the same name on Wikipedia.
• You can find logs for files on English Wikipedia by going to en:Special:Log and entering the name in the "Target" field. Remember to include the File: namespace.
• Sometimes, only the deletion is shown. Uploads made prior to December 2004 are not included. Older uploads were manually logged; see en:Wikipedia:Upload log.
• If the file had a different name on Wikipedia, it may be useful to look at the original uploader's log (if mentioned by the user making the transfer). Go to en:Special:Log and enter the user's name in the "Performer" field. Do not include the User: namespace. Won't worn for uploads made prior to December 2004.
• You can search for the filename or the original uploader's name in the manually logged uploads by going to en:Special:Search and adding prefix:Wikipedia:Upload_log after the filename or username.
• You can find copies of old file descriptions using archive.org's Wayback Machine. Prior to the deployment of Mediawiki 1.14 in 2009, the File: namespace was called Image:, so the pattern for the URLs is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Name_of_the_file.jpg. Some snapshots seem to contain more information than others.
• The same principles apply to files from other projects (except the manual upload logs, which I believe is specific to English Wikipedia). It may be helpful to change the interface language.

This might seem like a lot of work, but I think we owe it to reusers and the original uploaders not to take such deletions lightly – it's not their fault if the person who made the transfer left out a bunch of details. But if all of the above fails or the original upload also lacked information, then I agree with deletion. Cheers, —LX (talk, contribs) 12:23, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for your kind guidance!廣九直通車 (talk) 12:31, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

In defence of avoiding deletion

This discussion has been moved back to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Manjari Fadnis Charitable works.jpg. Please respect my request to keep discussions where they started. Don't continue discussions from elsewhere on this page, as this makes discussions harder to follow. Thank you. —LX (talk, contribs) 08:17, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Request a review

This discussion has been moved back to User talk:Mraslat#File:Mohanad against South Korea in 2013.jpg. Please respect my request to keep discussions where they started. Don't continue discussions from elsewhere on this page, as this makes discussions harder to follow. Thank you. —LX (talk, contribs) 09:26, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Servizio dell'Oca - Museo di Capodimonte

This discussion has been moved back to User talk:DenghiùComm#File tagging File:Museo di Capodimonte, Servizio dell'Oca - Poggioreale 1.jpg. Please respect my request to keep discussions where they started. Don't continue discussions from elsewhere on this page, as this makes discussions harder to follow. Thank you. —LX (talk, contribs) 09:45, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

About《Rocío Reza.jpg》and 《OscarGonzalesEguiarte.jpg》

I "LX", I saw the request to delete the files but I don't understand why, if you can tell me what's the problem with the files I probably fix then, but, the files are in use and they're about a politician and a bushwaker, and they had their articles in the Spanish Wikipedia (es:Rocío Reza Gallegos and es:Óscar González Eguiarte). I hope we could fix this.

P.S. Sorry for the bad grammar but I'm not really good with the English.

Hola "LX", he observado el requerimiento de borrado de los archivos sin embargo no logro entender del todo el porque. Si pudieras decirme cual es el problema con los archivos podría arreglarlo sin embargo te menciono que los archivos son sobre una política y un guerrillero respectivamente y estos tienen sus artículos en la wikipedia en español (es:Rocío Reza Gallegos and es:Óscar González Eguiarte). Espero que podamos solucionar este problema.

P.D. Una disculpa por la mala gramática, en realidad no soy muy bueno con el inglés. ¡Saludos!

EddieBurciaga (talk) 02:08, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

The problem is that I don't believe that you personally created those photographs yourself. If you personally created File:Rocio Reza.jpg yourself, why is the photo so small? Would you be able to provide the original full-resolution photo? If you personally created File:OscarGonzalezEguiarte.png, why does it look like a photo of a photo or a screenshot of a video? If you can answer these questions, the right place to do it is in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Rocio Reza.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:OscarGonzalezEguiarte.png. —LX (talk, contribs) 09:11, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

About the File:Rocio Reza.jpg it was created by my self, and I explained you here (Commons:Deletion requests/File:Rocio Reza.jpg) and the photo is small beacuse I took the photo with a cellphone and appear other men and women and obvously they don't want to apper in the internet. EddieBurciaga (talk) 00:02, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

About some files

Hi LX!, I saw your message about some files that I uploaded. I want to tell you some thing about the files:

• File:Rocio Reza.jpg: I explained the situation about the file up here and in the discussión about the delete request (Commons:Deletion requests/File:Rocio Reza.jpg).
• About File:BRONCO.svg, File:Escudo H. Congreso de Chihuahua.png, File:Escudo Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua.png, File:PRT Party (Mexico).png, File:Richardi Independiente.png, File:Ivideliza Independiente.png, File:Guerrero Independiente.png, File:Layín Independiente.png, File:Chávez Independiente (Nayarit).png, File:Logo Acción Juvenil.png, File:PPC Party (Mexico).png, File:Sotelo Independiente.png, File:Nevarez Independiente.png, File:Roberto Gonzalez Independiente.png, File:Tena Independiente.png, File:Caballo Lozoya Independiente.png, File:Terrazas Independiente.png, File:Mesta Independiente.png and File:PSDI Party (Mexico).png, this files depicts the coat of arms, banner, or emblem of Mexico, one of its states, municipalities, or any other political subdivision, or a similar distinctive symbol belonging to an international or "recognized" organization, or NGO, operating in or outside of Mexico. According to Mexican copyright law, article 14 subparagraph VII [2] these coats of arms are not eligible for protection under the federal copyright law. I have already put the correct license information.
• File:Maru Campos.jpg: Well, the source [3] said in the feet of the page "El contenido de esta página está publicado con licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento y Compartir igual 3.0. (The content of this page is published with a Creative Commons Attribution and Share 3.0 license.)" and it said the page of the file.

EddieBurciaga (talk) 01:06, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Standard of the President of Bulgaria

This discussion has been moved back to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Standard of the President of Bulgaria.svg. Please respect my request to keep discussions where they started. Don't continue discussions from elsewhere on this page, as this makes discussions harder to follow. Thank you. —LX (talk, contribs) 23:03, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

license valid

Hello, image [4] website [5] You are free to copy texts, whether in whole or part, and pictures from this website provided that proper acknowledgement is given.

What is the license used? - Mraslat (talk) 15:04, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Mraslat: First of all, the only one who can grant a legitimate license is the copyright holder. Webs.com is a free web host where anyone can create a site anonymously, so there is no way to know who is behind alshorta.webs.com. Whoever they are, they are using photos created by others. For example, the photo of Alaa Mhawi is a non-free photo by Robert Cianflone/Getty Images AsiaPac. alshorta.webs.com probably don't have the right to use that photo themselves, they certainly don't have the right to use it without attribution, they definitely don't have the right to let others use it, and they absolutely don't have the right to demand that alshorta.webs.com is credited for the works of others. I don't know if the photo of Mohanad Ali is also grabbed from a non-free source, but the site clearly cannot be trusted when it comes to copyright.

Secondly, even if that statement had been issued by the legitimate copyright holder, it is not sufficient for our purposes. Commons requires licenses used here to explicitly allow anyone to use, modify and redistribute the work for any purpose, including commercial purposes. That statement only mentions copying and does not say whether modifications or commercial uses are allowed. If you are unsure, it is best to avoid sources that don't explicitly mention a well-known license by name. —LX (talk, contribs) 16:49, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Some stroopwafels for you!

yay Wikiequus210 (talk) 08:38, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Copyright violations of Manutd2410

Would the files listed at Special:ListFiles/Manutd2410 not be copyright violations? It looks to me like most of them are copyrighted logos, and about 10-20% of them are instances of textlogos. I tagged the first half for deletion (newest to oldest) as a copyright violation when I noticed you tagging them form the opposite direction (oldest to newest) as no permission. As you're significantly more experienced than I at commons, could you help me understand why it would be as "no permission"? Thanks, Vermont (talk) 01:21, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

Hi Vermont! The uploader's authorship and copyright claims are obviously patently false for several of the logotypes. It's probably false for every single one, but I'm not familiar with all of them. I agree that some of them could be kept by removing the false authorship, copyright and licensing claims and adding {{PD-textlogo}}. Others are likely way above the threshold of originality required for copyright protection and should ideally be speedily deleted as copyright violations.

But since the threshold varies from country to country, in order to determine whether {{copyvio}} or {{PD-textlogo}} is appropriate (or if the uploader might actually be the author and copyright holder), one would have look at every single upload, determine the origin, determine the threshold of originality in the country of origin, and make an assessment against that. That's more work than we have volunteers for, especially considering that Manutd2410 is far from the only user batch uploading logos with false authorship claims. If you want to do it for a few files, I certainly don't mind, but there aren't enough of you and me to handle every upload of this nature. Ultimately, it is the uploader's responsibility to provide correct information, so by using {{no permission since}}, I'm giving them the opportunity to do that along with the benefit of doubt in case they can actually back up their authorship claims. They seem to be too busy uploading to care, though. —LX (talk, contribs) 09:06, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

Regarding File:KaitenType1Turret.JPG

Hello, regarding the file, I originally thought that "Personal Photograph" is ambiguous and need more source, so I applied NSD, and I hereby thank you for your guidance again. About files who do not state clearly the source and author like the file regarding, what can I do to organise the source and author infomation? Thank you. 廣九直通車 (talk) 11:17, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

Hi 廣九直通車! On its own, I agree that "Personal Photograph" might be a bit ambiguous (whose personal photograph?), and if we had been dealing with an uploader without an established record, I might agree with the tagging. But it really helps to look at things in context. World Imaging has uploaded 2073 photos taken with a Canon PowerShot S110. I see no reason to believe that "Personal Photograph" means anything other than "Own work" in that context. —LX (talk, contribs) 11:34, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

discussion style, File:Leuchtturm von Oecusse.jpg

hi LX, sorry that i accidently saved the reordering of the discussion threads here. i found the discussion intendation broken and i reformatted and previewed to better understand who said what. then i added my comment in the wrong window and saved. let me repeat what i consider important and let me make a comment where a misunderstanding occurred imo, resp where i got off track and had to reread it 3 times.

• you, indentation 5 or so: "Perhaps it would be possible to give an OTRS volunteer access to the image"
• jpf, no indent, but direct answer: "isn't it possible anymore that one asks for access to the group". unfortunatly no "cool idea, you would be prepared to check, her's the gropu name, i can permit you access"
• you, following his indent: "i cannot see the group name". unfortunately no "yes, i could try. but the group name does not show up so no join button. what is the groups link / name?"
• jpf, distracted: "should i make a screenshot", thinking you do not want to get access, thinking about alternatives.
• somebody else: "a screenshot can be edited", following up on this distraction, further tearing away from your original proposal "OTRS volunteer access"
• me: "i can confirm" and made sure the group name is there. i did see the "OTRS volunteer" but did not explicitely say "i am no OTRS volunteer, is my confirmation enough?". and i did not mention that i requested access and jpf granted it. will correct it.

so a quite funny thread. should be an example for a sociology and psychology lecture at a university :) in the category of asking the time by "do you have a watch" and getting a "yes" as an answer. if we continue this style we probably are really replaceable by computers, hehe. so please let us know who needs to do what to unwind the situation. either here or there. --ThurnerRupert (talk) 06:58, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Hi ThurnerRupert! Thanks for the explanation. If my understanding of the issue is correct, what is needed is for an OTRS volunteer to gain access to the image on Facebook. I don't know how you identified the group in question, but that should make it a lot easier for an OTRS volunteer to gain access, so thank you for that. (And regarding the indentation, the scheme used by most experienced editors is described at en:Wikipedia:Indentation.) Cheers, —LX (talk, contribs) 12:59, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

how i identified the group? i asked jan-patrick in a personal chat in a way he could not misunderstand: "jan-patrick, what is the group name and link?" :) thanks for the "how we indent" link - i guess if i change that recommendation it would be reverted. the change would be: in a time ordered discussion every person uses its indent. only in exceptional cases where a specific answer is given, indent one more. this makes amongst all easier to read on mobile phones. ha, i now saw i was not explicit enough again, so let me ask directly: can you please add here who needs to do what to make it progress? --ThurnerRupert (talk) 02:56, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

ThurnerRupert: Done, I hope. All good? —LX (talk, contribs) 05:55, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

File tagging File:Alasha Khan Mausoleum.jpg

I am not an original uploader, I have corrected rotation and contrast of the image I didn't uploaded. Please don't place warnings at my talk page as it is senseless, image past or image future is not interesting for me, but this kind of warnings are making me a sort of 'hooligan' who is an illegal content uploader. Thank you, Bogomolov.PL (talk) 23:01, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Ladislav Rott st. (1851-1906).jpg

tak si to smaž, asi jsi odborník, ale toto dílo je v ČR volné --Martin wolf (talk) 19:43, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

This discussion is taking place at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ladislav Rott st. (1851-1906).jpg. Please comment there, not here. —LX (talk, contribs) 19:45, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

navrženo na smazání tak doufám, že jsi spokojen a neraď mi kde mám co komentovat, jsem čech a mluvím jen česky--Martin wolf (talk) 20:00, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

As clearly explained to you on the file description if you have the interface language configured correctly: "Tento soubor byl navržen na smazání od 7 leden 2019. Pokud se k tomu chcete vyjádřit, navštivte příslušnou diskusní stránku." —LX (talk, contribs) 20:05, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Sanchaportugal.jpg

This discussion has been moved back to User talk:Mhmrodrigues#File:Sanchaportugal.jpg. Please respect my request to keep discussions where they started. Don't continue discussions from elsewhere on this page, as this makes discussions harder to follow. Thank you. —LX (talk, contribs) 20:01, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

Hum

I'm sure you will see it but... Thanks for the links to the other DRs and the work. Best --Herby ^{talk thyme} 15:31, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Thank you! :) —LX (talk, contribs) 15:34, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Category:Sports_executives_and_administrators

Sports executives and administrators has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at Commons:Categories for discussion/2019/01/Category:Sports_executives_and_administrators. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

E4024 (talk) 17:55, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

A cookie for you!

Thanks a lot for your help! Lerouxf (talk) 20:21, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

Help 🆘

I want this photo to be uploaded again by cropping Chajing,I need your help. Awangba Mangang (talk) 13:52, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

Awangba Mangang: You already got a response to the same question at User talk:JuTa#I want this image to be uploaded by cropping. (permanent link). If you still have questions after reading that, it's probably best to elaborate on any follow-up questions at the help desk, where there are several people helping out. That way you don't have to depend on a particular individual to see your question, know the answer, and have time to respond. Cheers, —LX (talk, contribs) 15:59, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

Thank you. Awangba Mangang (talk) 02:17, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Re: Ryanair

This discussion has been moved back to User talk:Pabbot#File:Ryanair logo.svg. Please respect my request to keep discussions where they started. Don't continue discussions from elsewhere on this page, as this makes discussions harder to follow. Thank you. —LX (talk, contribs) 21:37, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

Re: Ryanair 2

This discussion has been moved back to User talk:Pabbot#File:Ryanair logo.svg. Please respect my request to keep discussions where they started. Don't continue discussions from elsewhere on this page, as this makes discussions harder to follow. Thank you. —LX (talk, contribs) 21:40, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

Sockpuppet

Hi LX, I recently found another user uploading LGBT flags. Do take a look at Blågult flagga. 大诺史 (talk) 08:55, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

大诺史: Yep, that's definitely a sock. And grammatically incorrect Swedish. Tagged, check requested, files nominated. —LX (talk, contribs) 09:09, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

Thank you. 大诺史 (talk) 09:13, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

Re: Autopatrol given

I really don't need any user rights to avoid affecting my use for User:Kai3952 account. If I need autopatrolled rights, I can make a request at any time at COM:RFR. However, the problem is that User:Morgankevinj didn't ask me first. Now I feel depressed because he left an indelible record of the autopatrolled rights in my account. It was the worst punishment for me!!!--Kai3952 (talk) 06:37, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

The above is about your reply at Commons:Help desk.--Kai3952 (talk) 06:45, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

And autopatrolled does not affect your use in any way. It's not a punishment. —LX (talk, contribs) 10:01, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

Re

This discussion has been moved back to Commons talk:Abuse filter#Report by 183.178.181.29. Please respect my request to keep discussions where they started. Don't continue discussions from elsewhere on this page, as this makes discussions harder to follow. Thank you. —LX (talk, contribs) 18:26, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Sock

Hi LX, I've found a possible sock of Kritkitty. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:23, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

• Machel-Chissano

Hi 大诺史! I already requested a check of Machel-Chissano 11 days ago. It's been confirmed and blocked. —LX (talk, contribs) 19:15, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Oh, I didn’t see the user’s userpage. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 23:03, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Important message for file movers

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

• To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
• To perform file name swaps.
• When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at Wikimedia Commons.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 22:04, 23 November 2019 (UTC)