Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Liverpool Metropolitan Cathedral at dusk (reduced grain), corrected perspective.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File:Liverpool Metropolitan Cathedral at dusk (reduced grain), corrected perspective.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Jun 2010 at 07:15:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Liverpool Metropolitan Cathedral.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Chowells - uploaded by Chowells - nominated by Patriot8790 -- патриот8790Say whatever you want 07:15, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- патриот8790Say whatever you want 07:15, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cesco77 (talk) 10:11, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, I think this is a very good shot of the subject. My only regret is that the altar and cross are almost hidden in darkness ; yet this is part of the design of the cathedral, and not a shortcoming of this picture. --MAURILBERT (discuter) 13:10, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Quality is not the best. A day shot would have shown better detail. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 13:22, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 05:23, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - ditto to Alvesgaspar - MPF (talk) 08:45, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I love it --Llorenzi (talk) 12:42, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Quality is more than good, for this picture featured in the english wikipedia. A day shot would not have shown better details, for example the very nice light through the stained glass windows above. --Jebulon (talk) 00:42, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - nice. Jonathunder (talk) 17:27, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - great atmosphere (which is what this image is about, IMO), good details and sharpness. — Yerpo Eh? 20:43, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice. -- Laitche (talk) 21:06, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Pudelek (talk) 12:15, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment No information template (I am considering to vote "oppose" for that reason). No creator templates for the architects (requires an analysis of each work done by each architect and finding out how many architects did the features that are seen on this view). Perhaps a creator template for the stained glass artist would not be superfluous either. Could it be possible to mention in simple words the location of the photographer (taken from South ? North ? West ? East? ) in addition to the Geotagging ? I can't find out the date when the pic was taken (was that 70 years ago ?). Where has the camera EXIF gone ? Or was it an argentic picture ? But it is a beautiful picture, if that's what you want to hear. Teofilo (talk) 12:32, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 08:23, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/File:Liverpool_Metropolitan_Cathedral_at_dusk_(reduced_grain),_corrected_perspective.jpg&oldid=40533745"