User talk:Piotrus

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Adminpedia-image.png
It is possible I will not log in to this account for days. Please leave me a message on en-Wikipedia - I log there everyday.

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3

Warning[edit]

You can convert a 'no source' tagging into a regular DR, but you cannot remove it without first resolving the problem. Jcb (talk) 06:32, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

(An edit like this ís' helpful and allowed of course) - Jcb (talk) 06:35, 17 October 2016 (UTC)


Unblock request granted

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, and one or more administrators has reviewed and granted this request.

Request reason: "I was blocked in what I consider to be a clear abuse of admin power, not following Commons:Blocking policy. I received no warning about actions that could lead to blocking (see above, this warning is not mentioning any possibility of a block, the blocking admin didn't even explain the rationale here, blocking log states "Removing problem tag after warnings" which is not a valid block reason, not to mention it was a warning, singular, not multiplies). I have reverted an admin, User:Jcb, on several pages (File:Sachsen-koenig - coat of arms.jpg, File:Karel Eichler.jpg, File:8a10895r toll bridge mississippi river.jpg, File:Sakai Cockpit A5M.jpg, File:KarikatuurvanMercier.gif, in all cases noting that the Template:No source is invalid, as a source is given), but no more then once per page (Jcb is the only person who is edit warring, having reverted two editors at File:Sakai Cockpit A5M.jpg), and I started a discussion at Commons:Village_pump#User_nominating_images_with_sources_for_deletion_with_no_sources_template, in which another user, User:Fæ, agreed with me. The admin who blocked me, User:Jcb, has not replied to most of my arguments and keeps reverting me at the image pages linked above with no rationale, despite my repeated requests. The latest incident was at (see my edit history, including diff to my last edit breaks unblock template), where he reverted my undoing of his edit (I explained my rationale, he did not) and then he proceeded to block me. This seems to me, I repeat, a clear abuse of admin powers - admin blocking a user with whom he is in dispute (i.e. involved admin), where such user is not breaking any policies. I am following best wiki practices in the form of en:WP:BRD (I have also posted to User_talk:Jcb#Please_be_more_careful_with_your_deletion_nominations, and I have always included a rationale with my undoing of his edits, something which he never did), Jcb is not participating in discussion about individual images (since he never replied to my edit summaries or at VP regarding said images), just blocking me, without following blocking policies (I was not properly warned, I was not notified with a block template regarding the reasons, I am unaware of any rule against removing the Template:No source, which Jcb claims to be a blockable offense (note, again, I was never told removing said template is blockable), and therefore, finally, I did not break any rules except undoing edits by an admin, which the last time I check is not a blockable offence). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 09:47, 17 October 2016 (UTC)"
Unblock reason: "Block by an involved administrator who didn't responded to the provided arguments but instead used his tools to win the argument. I will write a better motivation at com:AN. Natuur12 (talk) 11:19, 17 October 2016 (UTC)"
This template should be archived normally.
(Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

čeština  Deutsch  English  español  français  hrvatski  magyar  Plattdüütsch  português  suomi  македонски  русский  हिन्दी  中文(台灣)‎  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−

I have asked for an independent review of this use of the sysop tools at Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard#Block_of_User:Piotrus. Thanks -- (talk) 09:56, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Archiving[edit]

You may wish to look at en:User:Lowercase sigmabot III/Archive HowTo for details of auto-archiving settings. If you restore your page history, this would ensure that there are no later issues with hitting the template maximum limit for talk pages. If you examine the wiki-source of my talk page, there's a practical configuration there that has a nice minimal appearance. Thanks -- (talk) 11:55, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Question on User:Piotrus/PolishCopyright[edit]

Hi Piotrus, after reading your summary I went to s:Polish Copyright Law. As far as I understand, the text there shows the 1994 Act with the 2000 amendments. Therefore, in article 36, a clear statement (section (b)) about anonymous works is provided. That's covered in your summary. However, in section (c) an additional statement is introduced: if, under this Act, a person other than the author owns the author's economic rights -from the date of the dissemination of the work; and if the work has not been disseminated -from the date of the establishment thereof. As far as I understand, it weakens the 70 years pma rule and applies it only to the cases where the author keeps his/her economic rights. In any other case, 70 years must be applied to the publication date and not to the author's death. Am I missing anything? What kind of template would be applicable there? Many thanks into advance --Discasto talk 11:14, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

@Discasto: An interesting find. It means only that if the copyright has is owned from the very beginning by another person (ex. because it was a work for hire), then the authors pma is irrelevant, and the 70 years need to be tracked from the publication date. I am a bit iffy about the meaning of "the date of the establishment thereof" but having read the Polish text I think it means the date of the works creation. I think this is analogical to the US law, where works owned by corporations have a set period after which the copyright expires, regardless of who is the author (see w:Work_for_hire#Copyright_duration). It is a good find, and I've updated the guide. However, as I've noted there, since there is no practical way to usually figure out if the economic rights have been transferred, it is kind of a moot point in practice. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 07:11, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:57, 8 November 2016 (UTC)


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

--Ralth Galth (talk) 04:52, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

File:Odaiba Tokyo August 2014 Gundam 010.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Odaiba Tokyo August 2014 Gundam 010.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

G I Chandor (talk) 03:07, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Yokohama August 2014 31.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Yokohama August 2014 31.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

G I Chandor (talk) 14:56, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Kingdom of Galicia.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Kingdom of Galicia.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 01:13, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Sir Edgar Vincent, Viscount d'Abernon (1857-1941) Financier & Diplomat.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Sir Edgar Vincent, Viscount d'Abernon (1857-1941) Financier & Diplomat.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 22:36, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Yokohama August 2014 32.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Yokohama August 2014 32.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

G I Chandor (talk) 03:19, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, G I Chandor (talk) 08:04, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Yokohama August 2014 41.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Yokohama August 2014 41.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

G I Chandor (talk) 08:05, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Zojo-ji Temple Minata Tokyo August 2014 15.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Zojo-ji Temple Minata Tokyo August 2014 15.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

G I Chandor (talk) 02:11, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Zojo-ji Temple Minata Tokyo August 2014 51.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Zojo-ji Temple Minata Tokyo August 2014 51.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

G I Chandor (talk) 02:12, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Otakon 2012 general 004.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Otakon 2012 general 004.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Taivo (talk) 20:54, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

File:Yokohama August 2014 05.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Yokohama August 2014 05.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

G I Chandor (talk) 01:46, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

File:Kociol lokomobilowy.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Kociol lokomobilowy.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 17:45, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

File:Akihabara August 2014 01.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Akihabara August 2014 01.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

G I Chandor (talk) 06:12, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

File:Akihabara August 2014 09.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Akihabara August 2014 09.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

G I Chandor (talk) 06:13, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

File:Songdo International Business District 25.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Songdo International Business District 25.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Canopus Grandiflora 09:06, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Sosnowiec-stamps-PM1-2.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Sosnowiec-stamps-PM1-2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 23:52, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Sosnowiec-stamps-PM3-4.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Sosnowiec-stamps-PM3-4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 23:52, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Sosnowiec-stamps-PM5-triangle.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Sosnowiec-stamps-PM5-triangle.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 23:53, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Skansen w punsku 13.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Skansen w punsku 13.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Hiddenhauser (talk) 19:17, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Zywiec summer 2016 111.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Zywiec summer 2016 111.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Tolomm (talk) 10:36, 30 June 2017 (UTC)


Category:Beaches of Canary Islands[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Category:Beaches of Canary Islands has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JT Curses (talk) 23:23, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

International trucks[edit]

There is a discussion on this page whether images should be categorised as International trucks or International Harvester trucks.   Not many wikipedia contributors have contributed to the discussion or voted with their preference, but you have contributed to material on International Harvester.   I would be grateful, if you have the time, if you would share your own opinion on the page name.  And thank you. Eddaido (talk) 00:30, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Forney Transportation Museum[edit]

Thank you for contributing these interesting images. Please would you yourself go to the great deal of trouble of identifying all the subjects. I know no-one else will (I just began and then found myself wondering why I was doing it) and then of course your work of five years ago is completely wasted. Thanks, Eddaido (talk) 08:36, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Unfortunately I am not a car affictionado, all I could do is ID stuff based on descriptions visible in the photos. Sooner or later someone will ID it. I'd suggest posting to English Wikipedia's WikiProject Cars, it is very active and I expect some members will jump on this task very quickly. (Do ping me on Eng wiki if you post there, I'll second this idea :D) --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 08:56, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
You are the most wonderful optimist. We've all waited five years already haven't we. You could try talking to the Forney Transportation Museum. If we don't know the subject of the pictures they are quite useless to Wikimedia / Wikipedia aren't they. Would you like to take them down? Eddaido (talk) 09:48, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
Just tag them with unidentified automobiles category and let w:collective intelligence do its job. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 07:46, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
Hmmm, I think that might be me you're talking about. Its really why I wrote to you, I went on strike. Eddaido (talk) 07:55, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
Hehe I understand this well. But surely you are not the only person tagging unidentified vehicles. If it is no longer fun, take a break, mate. And I am pretty sure WikiProject Cars has at least several active people, someone may help if you ask. I really don't know much about the cars, the only thing I can do is to read what is in the description plaque if there is one. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 04:32, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
How about you take responsibility for your own stuff and try a bit of asking around for "person tagging unidentified vehicles", or just try to work the i.d.s out for yourself — is that really too hard for you? You could even hunt for a museum catalogue and identify them that way or you could simply phone the museum and ask them to do it on WM but rather you than me - as they say. And take your break after that. Hehe! Eddaido (talk) 04:59, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
Dude, why do you want me to do this? I don't want to and I don't care. If you don't want to and don't care, don't do it, but don't tell others they should do it. We all as much or as little here as we find fun. I currently don't feel like working on those images, I have others to tag. Cars have a ton of fans (compared to some other topics) so I think they will get tagged sooner then some other obscure museum stuff (for example) I feel like working on instead. Again: if you don't want to work on those images, don't. But don't tell me do it. You are not my boss. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 05:06, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
I'm not your boss (why do you say that?) I'm complaining to you, the editor responsible, about your unfinished work. I didn't tag it. Some other public spirited party did that. Hehe Eddaido (talk) 22:32, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Zdjęcia z biblioteki Sejmowej[edit]

nie współpracowałem z BS, oparłem się na tym, iż zdjęcia te powstały i zostały opublikowane przed 1994 chociażby w formie legitymacji poselskich. Zdjęcia są ze strony BS, dla przykładu komunikat o treści: Zamieszczone w bazie materiały stanowią własność intelektualną i podlegają ochronie zgodnie z prawem autorskim, jednak mogą być kopiowane w dowolnej formie i ilości o ile proces publikacji ich treści nie będzie nosił znamion działalności komercyjnej a każda kopia będzie wskazywała na źródło pochodzenia. Przeczytałem powyższe postanowienia i zobowiązuję się ich przestrzegać. Kliknij aby wyświetlić

nie wyświetlał się przed żadnym z wymienionych zdjęć, zapewne z powodu ich powstania przed 1994. Aight 2009 (talk) 10:41, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Dla przykładu: https://bs.sejm.gov.pl/exlibris/aleph/a22_1/apache_media/JH69N7MRCCSJ3BXNAM2ASP1VBJ5H2U.jpg http://bs.sejm.gov.pl/F?func=find-b&request=000005850&find_code=SYS&local_base=ARS10

a tak wygląda dla np marszałek kopacz informacja o PA: https://bs.sejm.gov.pl/F?func=service&doc_library=ARS10&doc_number=000007498&line_number=0001&func_code=WEB-FULL&service_type=MEDIA Wyszukiwanie odbywa się przez katalog: parlamentarzyści polscy. bs.sejm.gov.pl/ Aight 2009 (talk) 10:49, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Otakon 2012 103.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Otakon 2012 103.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sw0 (talk) 02:52, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Otakon 2012 241.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Otakon 2012 241.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sw0 (talk) 02:52, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Otakon 2012 444.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Otakon 2012 444.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sw0 (talk) 02:53, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Otakon 2012 445.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Otakon 2012 445.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sw0 (talk) 02:53, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Tekkoshocon 2010 cosplay 142.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Tekkoshocon 2010 cosplay 142.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sw0 (talk) 03:27, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Akihabara August 2014 08.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Akihabara August 2014 08.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Дима Г (talk) 09:33, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Tarnopol (Ternopil) summer 2017 013.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Tarnopol (Ternopil) summer 2017 013.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nik Deleter (talk) 06:48, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

File:Tarnopol (Ternopil) summer 2017 005.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Tarnopol (Ternopil) summer 2017 005.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nik Deleter (talk) 06:50, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

File:Tarnopol (Ternopil) summer 2017 008.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Tarnopol (Ternopil) summer 2017 008.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nik Deleter (talk) 06:52, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

File:Tarnopol (Ternopil) summer 2017 002.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Tarnopol (Ternopil) summer 2017 002.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nik Deleter (talk) 06:59, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

User:Piotrus/PolishCopyright[edit]

Myślę, że masz w tym tekście przynajmniej dwie nieścisłości, związane z URAA i utworami anonimowymi:

  1. 1946 and later works were restored in the U.S. by the URAA - nieprawda; URAA w tym przypadku dotyczy prac autorów zmarłych w 1946 lub później, a nie prac powstałych w 1946 lub później, jak sugeruje ten fragment.
  2. 1946-and-later anonymous works are protected for 70 years in Poland - również nieprawda; takie prace są z reguły chronione przez 70 lat od publikacji (a nie przez 70 lat od powstania, jak sugeruje ten fragment). Podobnie z URAA: ochrona prawnoautorska tu działa 95 lat od pierwszej publikacji, a nie 95 lat od powstania utworu (ew. 120 lat od powstania - ale to tylko w USA, nie u nas).

Termin 70 lat od powstania utworu w polskim prawie dotyczy tylko utworów, do których prawa ma inicjalnie pracodawca autora (Art. 36 pp. 3). Ankry (talk) 13:46, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Reszel July 2007 02.JPG[edit]

Hi Piotrus,

This church is obviously not in Reszel. I also could not find it in one of the neighbouring villages.

Can you tell, where it is?

My best regards,

Ulamm (talk) 12:38, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

File:How did the religions spread.JPG[edit]

Hello.

Can you improve and update File:How did the religions spread.JPG which you uploaded?

Yours sincerely, Artoxx (talk) 23:18, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

@Artoxx: I am not the author (see description). The map is pretty bad, and anyone with good image editing skills and 1-2 hours can make something much better. Sadly, I don't have the required skills. You can check Commons/Wikipedia Map Maker WikiProject and submit a request, but they are probably backlogged for months. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 16:26, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for your reply and advice. Artoxx (talk) 18:57, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Yongpyong Ski Resort Oct 2014 13.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Yongpyong Ski Resort Oct 2014 13.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

- Alexis Jazz 19:37, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Yongpyong Ski Resort Oct 2014 12.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Yongpyong Ski Resort Oct 2014 12.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

- Alexis Jazz 19:37, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Yongpyong Ski Resort Oct 2014 19.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Yongpyong Ski Resort Oct 2014 19.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

- Alexis Jazz 19:38, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Yongpyong Ski Resort Oct 2014 10.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Yongpyong Ski Resort Oct 2014 10.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

- Alexis Jazz 19:39, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Yongpyong Ski Resort Oct 2014 07.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Yongpyong Ski Resort Oct 2014 07.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

- Alexis Jazz 19:40, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

File:JogurtP1070447.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:JogurtP1070447.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 04:58, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Эlcobbola talk 08:00, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

File tagging File:Zakopane 2016 summer 417.JPG[edit]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  euskara  català  magyar  čeština  norsk bokmål  română  lietuvių  español  português  English  hrvatski  Plattdüütsch  français  Nederlands  norsk  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  polski  galego  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  ಕನ್ನಡ  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  اردو  العربية  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Zakopane 2016 summer 417.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:OP}} on file description page.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Yann (talk) 22:21, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Graffiti in Seoul 01.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Graffiti in Seoul 01.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

42.82.110.213 14:59, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Daebudo summer 2016 32.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Daebudo summer 2016 32.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Taivo (talk) 15:09, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Krzemieniec (Kremenets) summer 2017 055.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Krzemieniec (Kremenets) summer 2017 055.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Микола Василечко (talk) 08:49, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Zywiec summer 2016 068.JPG[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Zywiec summer 2016 068.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: 1930 painting unlikely to be "own work" - and no PD-old claim.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  Bahasa Melayu  Bahasa Indonesia  azərbaycanca  British English  dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  euskara  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  norsk bokmål  română  Lëtzebuergesch  español  português  English  hrvatski  Plattdüütsch  français  Nederlands  norsk  Malti  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:26, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Breslau-Masselwitz - Wrocław-Maślice - mapa (1912).jpg[edit]

asturianu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  euskara  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(中国大陆)‎  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Breslau-Masselwitz - Wrocław-Maślice - mapa (1912).jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Breslau-Masselwitz - Wrocław-Maślice - mapa (1912).jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Castillo blanco (talk) 13:54, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Bukowsko - mapa katastralna (1906).jpg[edit]

asturianu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  euskara  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(中国大陆)‎  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Bukowsko - mapa katastralna (1906).jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Castillo blanco (talk) 12:57, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Rektorzy Szkoly Glownej Warszawskiej.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Rektorzy Szkoly Glownej Warszawskiej.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cyfrowabiblioteka (talk) 10:47, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Stanisław Mikołajczyk.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Stanisław Mikołajczyk.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:07, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Taivo (talk) 07:00, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Commons:Categories for discussion/2019/04/Category:Jews in Brzeg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Commons:Categories for discussion/2019/04/Category:Jews in Brzeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this project page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2601:82:C101:B5F0:19C3:BFBB:52E0:4DD4 21:03, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, GMGtalk 10:35, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

@ Pre-1994 Polish photographs[edit]

Nie czuję się na siłach, by zabrać głos w tej dyskusji. Nie jestem prawnikiem i nie jestem twórcą mogącym mieć jakiś interes w temacie praw autorskich, więc mógłbym zabrać głos tylko jako ewentualny użytkownik. Moje podejście jest wobec tego dość skrajne: uważam większość ograniczeń uzasadnianych rzekomymi majątkowymi prawami autorskimi twórców (zwłaszcza wobec prostych prac, których nikt nigdy nikomu nie byłby w stanie sprzedać) za przejaw copyright paranoia. Julo (talk) 19:43, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

Copyright paranoia[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Copyright paranoia has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

4nn1l2 (talk) 09:14, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, De728631 (talk) 13:27, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Walking from Ebisu to Shibuya August 2014 01.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Walking from Ebisu to Shibuya August 2014 01.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yuraily Lic (talk) 10:29, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

File:Lwow (Lviv) - Cmentarz Łyczakowski (Lychakiv Cemetery) - summer 2017 019.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Lwow (Lviv) - Cmentarz Łyczakowski (Lychakiv Cemetery) - summer 2017 019.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Микола Василечко (talk) 14:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Polska 960 - 992.svg[edit]

Dziękuję za uwagi. Nie jest autorem pliku w wersji merytorycznej, wiele lat temu przyłożyłem rękę jedynie do wektoryzacji mapy. Ale to wcale nie musi być błąd:

pl:Niemcza (województwo lubuskie), pl:Niemcza.

Waćpan (talk) 12:56, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Category:Educational_diagrams[edit]

Category discussion warning

Category:Educational_diagrams has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Themightyquill (talk) 09:06, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

Category:Historical_diagrams[edit]

Category discussion warning

Category:Historical_diagrams has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Themightyquill (talk) 09:13, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

Cmentarz Obrońców Lwowa[edit]

Cześć: Dzięki za Twoje zdjęcia z Cmentarza Obrońców Lwowa. Czy masz jeszcze może inne, nieopublikowane, zdjęcia z tej nekropolii? Lowdown (talk) 17:12, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

@Lowdow: Zerkne, ale chyba to wszystko co mialem. Poza kilkoma ktore by wylecialy i tak jako 'wspolczesny pomnik', kilka i tak wylecialo (patrz wyzej), bo na Ukrainie nie a FOP wiec jak jest pomnik na grobowcu to jest problem :( . --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 04:31, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Gen Con Indy 2007 - elf statue.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Gen Con Indy 2007 - elf statue.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yuraily Lic (talk) 09:17, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Florida by Piotrus 217.JPG[edit]

Template:Idw/layout Aeroid (talk) 15:04, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Florida by Piotrus 221.JPG[edit]

Template:Idw/layout Aeroid (talk) 15:08, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Piotr Konieczny zdjecie 2.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Ankry ([[User talk:Ankry|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:53, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Yokohama Silk Museum 041.JPG[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Batholith ([[User talk:Batholith|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:06, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Yokohama Silk Museum 039.JPG[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Batholith ([[User talk:Batholith|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:06, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic ([[User talk:Yuraily Lic|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:42, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:J.B.Deczkowski z książeczki harcerskiej - lipiec 1938.jpg[edit]

Moje wątpliwości dotyczą tego, czy umieszczenie zdjęcia w książeczce harcerskiej spełnia amerykańskie wymogi opublikowania (wymagane w Template:Tl). Ale nie będę obstawał przy tej interpretacji. Ankry ([[User talk:Ankry|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:35, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

Template:Ping Tak na powaznie, to nie bedziemy miec 100% pewnosci dopoki nie wypowie sie sad w jakims precedensie, ale moim zdaniem uzycie zdjecia w publicznym dokumencie to jest publikacja. Dlaczego mialaby nie byc? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 03:53, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

Category:Propaganda_posters[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Estopedist1 ([[User talk:Estopedist1|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:15, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:


Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic ([[User talk:Yuraily Lic|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:35, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

Advocating to have a user banned from Wiki Commons[edit]

Next time, before you advocate to have a user banned from Wiki Commons, reach out to them first on their user page! --Steamboat2020 ([[User talk:Steamboat2020|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:48, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Gen Con Indy 2008 - Shadowrun posters.JPG[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Yuraily Lic ([[User talk:Yuraily Lic|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 02:56, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Gen Con Indy 2008 - EVE Online ads 1.JPG[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Yuraily Lic ([[User talk:Yuraily Lic|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 02:08, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

ƏXPLICIT 23:48, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:


Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic ([[User talk:Yuraily Lic|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:25, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

File:YorkQuizBook.jpg[edit]

Proabably worth checking before nominating a book cover for deletion that the uploader isn't the author of the book, who also designed the cover. Thanks. Rodhullandemu ([[User talk:Rodhullandemu|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:42, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate eien20 ([[User talk:Eien20|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:37, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

User:67writer[edit]

Sprzątniete. Zostały te współczesne. Ciekawe czy jego. Masur ([[User talk:Masur|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:17, 17 December 2020 (UTC)


File:Tarnopol (Ternopil) summer 2017 010.JPG[edit]

Template:Autotranslate And also

Микола Василечко ([[User talk:Микола Василечко|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:00, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

File:ASA conference 2008 - 32.JPG[edit]

Template:Autotranslate A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:38, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

ƏXPLICIT 13:23, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate PlanespotterA320 ([[User talk:PlanespotterA320|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:01, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate JuTa 23:59, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

PD?[edit]

Wg mnie nie - dla większości - brak podstawowych danych o źródłe (bo wiesz, skan fotki to nie źródło) i autorze, co uniemożliwia weryfikację PD. Template:T ciężko zastosować - bo jak udowodnić "publikację czy rozpowszechnienie". Ponadto wiele tych fotek to pochodne - np. [1] to skan czegoś innego. Masur ([[User talk:Masur|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:32, 6 March 2021 (UTC)


File:Tarnopol (Ternopil) summer 2017 004.JPG[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Микола Василечко ([[User talk:Микола Василечко|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:12, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

File:Facebook censored post.png[edit]

Template:Autotranslate

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Template:Noping.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot ([[User talk:Deletion Notification Bot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:12, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, GRuban ([[User talk:GRuban|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:02, 10 June 2021 (UTC)