User talk:Drbogdan

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Drbogdan!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

File:HEC Confirmed Gliese163c.jpg

File:HEC Confirmed Gliese163c.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Hekerui (talk) 23:21, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

File:HEC Banner Gliese163c Large.jpg

File:HEC Banner Gliese163c Large.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Hekerui (talk) 23:21, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Copied from => User_talk:Hekerui#Image:_File:HEC_Banner_Gliese163c_Large.jpg
Drbogdan (talk) 01:25, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Section Title => Image: File:HEC_Banner_Gliese163c_Large.jpg

@Hekerui - Thank you for your recent edit on my talk page re a "speedy deletion notice" re an uploaded image => [ [File:HEC_Banner_Gliese163c_Large.jpg]] - my understanding is that this image is entirely ok based on the noted permissions on the bottom of the original WebPage at => http://phl.upr.edu/press-releases/ahotpotentialhabitableexoplanetaroundgliese163 - please let me know if this is ok (or not) after all - I'm somewhat new to all this - in any case - Thanks again - and - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan (talk) 00:01, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi Drbogdan. Commons:Licensing states "Media licensed under non-commercial only licenses are not accepted as well." and the source website offers only a non-commercial license. In case you have uploaded other images under an insufficient license, please mark them for deletion, too. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask. Thank you Hekerui (talk) 08:33, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

File:PIA16873-Planck-CMB-NASA-20130321.jpg

File:PIA16873-Planck-CMB-NASA-20130321.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

— Huntster (t @ c) 05:34, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

File:PIA16875-MapMatterUniverse-Planck-NASA-20130321.jpg

File:PIA16875-MapMatterUniverse-Planck-NASA-20130321.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

— Huntster (t @ c) 05:34, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

File:PIA16873-Planck-CMB-NASA-20130321.jpg

File:PIA16873-Planck-CMB-NASA-20130321.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TheDJ (talk) 07:24, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

File:PIA16875-MapMatterUniverse-Planck-NASA-20130321.jpg

File:PIA16875-MapMatterUniverse-Planck-NASA-20130321.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

INeverCry 19:34, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

File:PIA16915-MarsCuriosityRover-Humidity-GaleCrater.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 00:19, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

 Done - Added following to commons:Help desk:

(section title) License Now OK? => for NASA image - [ [File:PIA16915-MarsCuriosityRover-Humidity-GaleCrater.jpg]].

(comment) License Now OK? => for NASA image - [ [File:PIA16915-MarsCuriosityRover-Humidity-GaleCrater.jpg]] - for some reason, the upload file procedure didn't seem to apply the license as usual - please update the image status accordingly of course - in any case - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan (talk) 00:55, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Categories and extraneous material

Hi Doc, thanks for your contributions here and on en.wiki, they are appreciated. I wanted to ask for your help on a small issue regarding the categories you're adding to the images you upload here. Using File:PIA16915-MarsCuriosityRover-Humidity-GaleCrater.jpg as an example, you added a variety of fairly horizontal categories...for example, Category:Curiosity rover, Category:Mars rovers, and Category:Mars exploration. These are all in the same category tree, and only the most specific category should be used (in this case, "Curiosity rover"). Same with Category:Gale Crater, Category:Aeolis Mons, and Category:Aeolis Palus...the most specific and appropriate is "Aeolis Palus", since it is a subcategory of "Gale Crater", and since Curiosity has not yet reached the extremities of Aeolis Mons. See the changes I made here, such as the categories I removed and the two I added. Note that I've also significantly cut down the description text...there's really no need to copy/paste the whole catalogue page, just the targeted descriptive text. Keeps it simple. :) If there's any questions about categorisation or anything else, please feel free to leave me a note. Cheers! — Huntster (t @ c) 05:00, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

@Huntster - Thank you *very much* for the clarifications - they're *very much* appreciated - makes sense - seems simpler - and seems better - and should make things easier going forth of course - might have to do some updating first opportunity - in any case - Thanks again - and - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan (talk) 15:44, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

File:MarsCuriosityRover-TwilightAtYellowknifeBay-Sols170-176.jpg

File:MarsCuriosityRover-TwilightAtYellowknifeBay-Sols170-176.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eniagrom (talk) 15:23, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

File:PIA16934-RoverDistances-20130515.jpg

Please note the date error for Lunokhod 1 which landed on the moon first in 1970.

Thank you *very much* for the correction - and related comment on the image description page - yes, seems the Lunokhod 1 landed in 1970 - and not 1973 as noted in the graph - Thanks again - and - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan (talk)

I put the original TIFF file through an image editor and fixed the dating, so everything should be okay now. — Huntster (t @ c) 05:34, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

@Huntster - Excellent job - looks Great - Thank you - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan (talk) 12:39, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Picture categories

Hello, Doc. Thank you for uploading Martian pictures. You have added a number of Curiosity rover traverse images and I have created a special category for these at Category:Curiosity rover traverse maps because there are so many of them (36, as I write). This new category is available if you upload any new maps.

When I was recategorising these from Category:Curiosity rover to Category:Curiosity rover traverse maps‎, I noticed you had overcategorised many pictures. For example, images you categorised as Category:Aeolis Mons or Category:Aeolis Palus were also unnecessarily categorised in Category:Gale Crater. The former two categories are contained within the latter, therefore, I have removed the Gale Crater category from most of those images.

Similarly, you categorised many images in Category:Curiosity rover also in Category:Mars exploration and in Category:Mars rovers, but those latter two categories were also unnecessary because the Curiosity rover is a subset of them, therefore, I also removed those categories from many images.

The correct use of the categories hierarchy is explained at Commons:Categories. O'Dea (talk) 23:17, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

@O'Dea - Thank you for your comments - they are *greatly* appreciated - no problem whatsoever re adjusting/removing categories associated with images - yes, I'll try to more aware of image categories in future uploads - Thanks again for your comments - and - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan (talk) 09:38, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

File:PIA18018-Kepler10System-10b-Rocky10c-20140602.jpg

File:PIA18018-Kepler10System-10b-Rocky10c-20140602.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

— Huntster (t @ c) 12:30, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Re: these nominations, you know I always appreciate your uploads. I just want to ensure we do our best to comply with copyright. Please don't take offence, okay? — Huntster (t @ c) 07:48, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

@Huntster - Thank you for your comments - and overseeing copyright issues - no problem whatsoever - I *entirely* understand - and am *completely* supportive of your efforts - Thanks again for your comments - and - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan (talk) 10:58, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

File:NASA-14147-EarthDay20140422-GlobalSelfie-20140522.jpg

File:NASA-14147-EarthDay20140422-GlobalSelfie-20140522.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

— Huntster (t @ c) 12:36, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

File:PIA18018-Kepler10System-10b-Rocky10c-20140602.jpg

File:PIA18018-Kepler10System-10b-Rocky10c-20140602.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Krd 13:28, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Rover driving distances

Hey there Doc, saw you updated File:Driving Distances on Mars and the Moon.png. I feel bad that you made all those manual fixes when NASA released a new version which fixes Lunokhod and adds Yutu (plus other data). I've uploaded under the same filename, but if you feel it would be better under a different name to preserve the previous data, please let me know. — Huntster (t @ c) 04:50, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

@Huntster - Thank you *very much* for your comments - and for finding and uploading the updated image version - no problem whatsoever - before adjusting the earlier image version, I had searched NASA to no avail for an updated version - seems the updated version may have been more available than I had thought - Thanks again for your comments - and your own efforts with all this - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan (talk) 14:54, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Macaca nigra self-portrait.jpg

Hi, Please do not modify the deletion request. Add references to the talk page. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:41, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

@Yann - Thanks for your comment - no problem whatsoever - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan (talk) 19:06, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Featured Picture Nomination

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that the image NASA-SNR0519690-ChandraXRayObservatory-20150122.jpg, which was created or uploaded by you, has been nominated for featured picture status; have a look at the nomination page. Thank you and good luck! -- Ras67 (talk) 21:52, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

@Ras67: Thank you *very much* for your comments - they're appreciated - Thanks again - and - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan (talk) 01:28, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Blue Marble 2012

Hey Doc, just an FYI, I deleted the Blue Marble 2012 image you just uploaded as it already existed. See File:North America from low orbiting satellite Suomi NPP.jpg. I apologise if there was significant work involved :/ — Huntster (t @ c) 16:26, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

@Huntster: - Thank you *very much* for your help with this - no problem whatsoever - great opportunity to update my IrfanView program v4.38 - Thanks again - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan (talk) 16:44, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:NASA-PerseusGalaxyCluster-ChandraXRayObservatory-20140624.jpg

And also:

• File:NASA-SNR0519690-ChandraXRayObservatory-20150122.jpg

Yours sincerely, Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 03:46, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Duplicate New Horizons images

I want to inform you that you've so far uploaded two duplicate images relating to the New Horizons mission; File:PIA19700-Pluto-Map-NewHorizons-20150703.jpg, which is a duplicate of File:Nh-pluto-map.jpg, uploaded 16 hours before your upload, and File:PIA19702-Pluto-HeartFeature-NewHorizons-20150707.jpg, which is a duplicate of File:Pluto by LORRI, 7 July 2015 (Color).jpg, uploaded two days beforehand. Please refrain from uploading identical image, whether they be same resolution or not. If you want to upload a higher quality version of a particular file, please upload a new version of the file by going to the image page and clicking on "Upload a new version of this file" under the File history section. The only reason for uploading it as a seperate file is if it is in a different format, such as a PNG file. User:PhilipTerryGraham 16:01, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

@PhilipTerryGraham: Thank you for your comments - however => PLEASE NOTE: Your image (uploaded at 13:08, 10 July 2015) was *not* derived from the lower-resolution image file you created originally (at 18:47, 8 July 2015) - but, instead, was derived from a higher-resolution image (at 15:31, 9 July 2015) => w:File:PIA19702-Pluto-HeartFeature-NewHorizons-20150707.jpg - originally sourced at http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/jpeg/PIA19702.jpg - in any case - Thanks again for your comments - and - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan (talk) 17:08, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

File:PIA19821-Sun-NuSTAR-Hinode-SDO-20150429.jpg

File:PIA19821-Sun-NuSTAR-Hinode-SDO-20150429.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

— Huntster (t @ c) 08:42, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

@Huntster: Thank you for your post - seems the image-file (at http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/catalog/?IDNumber=PIA19821 - was credited as "NASA/JPL-Caltech/GSFC/JAXA" - and might have been ok? - esp, since NASA was first in the line of credits? - in any case - Thanks again for your post - and - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan (talk) 12:16, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

While I would normally agree given that credit formatting, the overriding question is how NASA would have the right to release another agency's material to the public domain. There's just no evidence they had such permission, and JPL (unfortunately) releases these kinds of compilations using outside agency material quite often. — Huntster (t @ c) 12:43, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

PIA19619 - Ceres

I uploaded PIA19619, this is a global view of Ceres.

• File:Ceres - PIA19619.jpg
• File:Ceres - PIA19619 (cropped).jpg

--JCP (a.k.a. John Carlo Pagcaliwagan) 22:02, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

@Jcpag2012: Thank you for your note - it's *greatly* appreciated - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan (talk) 02:23, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

File:GalaxyCluster-Abell1033-20150826.jpg

File:GalaxyCluster-Abell1033-20150826.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

— Huntster (t @ c) 16:18, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Doc, please please please stop uploading composite images if you aren't 100% sure that *all* elements are freely licensed or public domain. Don't hesitate to ask me if you have questions about a desired image's status, I'm here to help. — Huntster (t @ c) 16:20, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

@Huntster: - Thank you for your comments - yes - agreed - in this instance - NASA seemed first in the line of credits - and therefore, possibly, ok - will try to be more aware of composite image credits in the future of course - Thanks again for your comments - and - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan (talk) 18:12, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Well, the credit line is actually "X-ray: NASA/CXC/Univ of Hamburg/F. de Gasperin et al; Optical: SDSS; Radio: NRAO/VLA", and NASA only leads the Chandra portion. Notice the different types of layers are separated by semicolons, and are specifically denoted as Xray, optical, radio. This means they are separate sources. Just something to look out for. — Huntster (t @ c) 18:19, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Thanks - yes - agreed - Thanks again - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan (talk) 18:29, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

File:PIA18920-Ceres-DwarfPlanet-Animation-20150219.gif

File:PIA18920-Ceres-DwarfPlanet-Animation-20150219.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Antonsusi (talk) 16:08, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

File:GalaxyNGC4993-DsoBrowser-NgcIcProject-2017.jpg

File:GalaxyNGC4993-DsoBrowser-NgcIcProject-2017.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Giovanni Cerretani (talk) 15:12, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

File:Bautzen Großwelka - Sauriergarten - Homo erectus 02 ies.jpg

Hi Drbogdan, please don't crop the original file. If you need a cropped version, make a new file of it and upload this one. Greetings, -- Ies (talk) 14:47, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

@Ies: Thank you for your comments - and suggestion - yes - agreed - uploaded a new cropped version at the following => File:Homo erectus 02 ies-crop.jpg - hope it's *entirely* ok - please let me know if otherwise - Thanks again - and - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan (talk) 15:30, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

File:KIC 8462852 TS r-prime-band Normalized Flux by TabbyTeam, 20170502-20171004.png

File:KIC 8462852 TS r-prime-band Normalized Flux by TabbyTeam, 20170502-20171004.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Renerpho (talk) 07:48, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

File:RoughDraft-TabbysStarDimmings-2009-to-2017.png

Hey Doc. I really think the border needs to be removed and contrast sharpened, and overall size enlarged. The newest material is especially impossible to make out now. I'm apparently dumb and cannot figure out the exact original images, but I'd like to give it a shot. — Huntster (t @ c) 07:12, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

@Huntster: Finally back online (down for several days due to XS local ACs?) - yes - agree about the graph - could be improved of course - tried earlier but not sufficiently experienced with GIMP/CAD/related to make a better effort at the moment - may try again at my next opportunity, but entirely ok with me if other editors (more experienced with this than I) would like to give it a try of course - hope this helps in some way - in any case - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan (talk) 19:17, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

Do you happen to know the filenames of the images you used for this work? — Huntster (t @ c) 22:13, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

@Huntster: yes - afaik atm - seems the image files are as follows => "File:KIC 8462852 - gesamte Helligkeitsmessung von Kepler.png" - and - "File:KIC 8462852 TS Normalized Flux by Bruce Gary, 20170502-20171231.png" - other relevant image files are at => "Category" - hope this helps - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan (talk) 23:08, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

Thanks bud! — Huntster (t @ c) 01:23, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

File:PIA21972-Jupiter-Clouds-JunoSpacecraft-20171024.jpg

File:PIA21972-Jupiter-Clouds-JunoSpacecraft-20171024.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Prismo (talk. | contr. | recs.) 06:12, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

File:ExoplanetarySystemHR8799-20181121.jpg

File:ExoplanetarySystemHR8799-20181121.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Original source is http://www.keckobservatory.org/hr8799c, no evidence that image is released under a free license. Further, credit line states "NRC-HIA" which is the NRC Herzberg Institute of Astrophysics. By NRC-HIA terms and conditions, commercial use is not allowed without permission, thus incompatible with Commons. Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

— Huntster (t @ c) 04:49, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

Hey Doc, please stop pulling images from Eurekalert without verifying that the original source provided the image under a free license (in which case. As with this above, there is zero evidence that the author released the image under a license compatible with Commons. — Huntster (t @ c) 04:54, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

@Huntster: Thank you for your comments - Yes - *entirely* agree - seems I may have unintentionally overlooked (or misunderstood) the permissions in some way - seems the credit line, apparently "NRC-HIA", may not be associated with NASA or related after a recent look - Thanks again for your comments - and - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan (talk) 14:21, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

Yes, NRC-HIA is a Canadian organisation. My concern with Eurekalert is twofold: they often obfuscate the credit or license of an image they re-post, and the potential strongly exists that such image, even if licensed appropriately, may not be as high of resolution or quality as pulling from an original source. That same concern goes for any site that re-posts material from somewhere else, like Spaceref and others. — Huntster (t @ c) 14:39, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

@Huntster: Yes - my uploaded images (over 1700 at the moment) usually come from the source website(s) (almost always NASA these days) if possible - also yes - seems some websites, like EurekAlert!, could make the permissions clearer (and resolutions better) - expect to watch this more closely going forth - Thanks again for *all* your comments - they're all *greatly* appreciated - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan (talk) 15:53, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

File:Report on the Investigation Into Russian Interference in the 2016 Presidential Election (2019).pdf

File:Report on the Investigation Into Russian Interference in the 2016 Presidential Election (2019).pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Habitator terrae 🌍 16:10, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

Fermi 5 year image

Hey Doc, noticed File:NASA-EntireSky-GammaRays-MoreThanOneGeV-FiveYears-FermiSpaceTelescope.jpg had previously been uploaded as File:Fermi 5 year 11000x6189.png. Would you have any objection to merging them? — Huntster (t @ c) 20:15, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

@Huntster: Thank you for your comments - and suggestion - no problem whatsoever merging the image files - hope this helps - iac - Thanks again - and - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan (talk) 22:53, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

File:BlueKeep logo.jpg

File:BlueKeep logo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

 — billinghurst sDrewth 11:18, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

File:NASA-AT2018cow-NeutronStar-BlackHole-20190110.jpg

File:NASA-AT2018cow-NeutronStar-BlackHole-20190110.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Unfortunately, images created by NOAO remain copyrighted. See https://www.noao.edu/image_gallery/copyright.html. Only the graphic overlays would be PD-NASA. Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

— Huntster (t @ c) 09:25, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

Sorry, just came across this one during a random licensing check of NOAO stuff. — Huntster (t @ c) 09:27, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

@Huntster: Thank you for your comments - and efforts - yes - thought NOAO, being a US national organization, may be providing PD-USGov images, but guess not after all ( https://www.noao.edu/image_gallery/copyright.html ) - in any case - Thanks again - and - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan (talk) 12:08, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

@Huntster: As added to Talk:AT2018cow => "FWIW - above image in the AT2018cow article has been removed - *entirely* ok with me to speedy delete image - hope this helps - in any case - Enjoy! :)" Drbogdan (talk) 12:45, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

As far as I'm aware, it's one of those weird public/private concerns. Regardless, they expressly claim an all rights reserved copyright over their works, and specifically disallow commercial reuse without prior notification. Their structure is complicated and involves a lot of partner, parent, and subsidiary organisation. However, until and unless I get a better feel for them, I'm not going to challenge material where the attribution leads with "NASA/", especially Hubble material (which typically uses NOAO ground telescope data to fill in the edges of Hubble photos, and I feel a de minimis argument could be applied there). — Huntster (t @ c) 20:25, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

@Huntster: Thanks for the reply - yes - *entirely* agree - no problem whatsoever - iac - Thanks again - and - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan (talk) 20:34, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

Archean Earth

Hey Doc, regarding File:NASA-EarlyEarth-PaleOrangeDot-20190802.jpg, I found a much higher resolution version of the image at https://www.flickr.com/photos/gsfc/32407459560, but it has slightly bolder colouration. If you think it's alright, I can upload over the current image, but if you prefer the paler current version, I'll upload a slightly higher res version at https://www.newsweek.com/biosignatures-extraterrestrial-life-chemicals-790410. Your call. — Huntster (t @ c) 00:22, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

@Huntster: Thanks for the note and suggestions - the Flicker image seems best imo - the Newsweek image seems about the same - however - its *entirely* ok with me with whatever you think best - Thanks again for your note - and - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan (talk) 00:45, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

Okay, I'll toss up the Flickr image. Cheers :) — Huntster (t @ c) 01:02, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

File:PIA21645-Jupiter-PerijovePass-JunoCam-20170525.jpg

File:PIA21645-Jupiter-PerijovePass-JunoCam-20170525.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

108.179.40.35 17:39, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Comet-2I-Borisov-color-GeminiObs-20190910.jpg

File:Comet-2I-Borisov-color-GeminiObs-20190910.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Uploader misinterpreted source website, see talk page. No evidence that image is released under any sort of free license. Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

— Huntster (t @ c) 18:52, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Need your presence at Featured video candidates

		We request the honor of your presence at Featured video candidates
		Dear Drbogdan, Are you Interested in Film Making/Videography/Cinematography or Animated films? Featured video candidates needs your help and you can help by reviewing , nominating your videos for the FV Tag. You can start reviewing/nominating videos now. Welcome ! -- Eatcha (talk) 05:46, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

FV Promotion

Play media

★ This file has been promoted to Featured media! ★ The file File:NASA-WeeklyArcticSeaIceAge-1984-2019.webm, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest file on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured media candidates/File:NASA-WeeklyArcticSeaIceAge-1984-2019.webm. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FVCBot (talk) 13:02, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

File:Star-LB-1-WikiSky-20191202.png

File:Star-LB-1-WikiSky-20191202.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

— Huntster (t @ c) 07:05, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

MOTD Notification

Play media

⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐ File:NASA-WeeklyArcticSeaIceAge-1984-2019.webm, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:03, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

FV userbox

Hi, Drbogdan I noticed that the video that you upload got featured at COM:FVC , if you wish you can add an user box {{User FV|colors=light-blue|category=Featured videos by {{subst:SUBPAGENAME}}}} to your user page if you wish. The wiki-text prints the following user box:

This user has uploaded featured media to Wikimedia Commons.

Thanks // Eatcha (talk) 10:44, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

@Eatcha: Thank you *very much* for your comments - and suggestion - it's *greatly* appreciated - Thanks again - and - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan (talk) 13:23, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

FV Promotion

Play media

★ This file has been promoted to Featured media! ★ The file File:Mars2020Rover-SampleCollectionStorage-20200206.webm, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest file on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured media candidates/File:Mars2020Rover-SampleCollectionStorage-20200206.webm. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FVCBot (talk) 13:04, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

File:PossibleGEODE-Powehi-M87Galaxy.jpg

File:PossibleGEODE-Powehi-M87Galaxy.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

— Huntster (t @ c) 16:43, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:PIA22946-Jupiter-RedSpot-JunoSpacecraft-20190212.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:PIA22946-Jupiter-RedSpot-JunoSpacecraft-20190212.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

File:CometC2020F3-Neowise-20200716.jpg

"© 2020 by Zoltan G. Levay, used with permission" would indicate this is not PD NASA.Geni (talk) 12:54, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

@Geni: Thanks for your comments - added the following to image => { {SD |1=G7 |2=may not be pd after all}} - hope this helps - Thanks again - and - Stay Safe and Healthy !! Drbogdan (talk) 13:15, 24 August 2020 (UTC)