User talk:Nefronus

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Nefronus!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel irc:wikimedia-commons #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], which produces: Image:Foo.jpg If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|correct name}} For more information read the full deletion guidelines.
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Nefronus!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT (talk) 06:14, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

• Image:Cs-sračka.ogg is uncategorized since 3 January 2009. BotMultichillT (talk) 06:14, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
• Image:Cs-bobr.ogg is uncategorized since 3 January 2009. BotMultichillT (talk) 06:14, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Image without license

File:Earth-cutaway-schematic-Czech.svg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 08:38, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

More fun nominations

Nominating photos for deletion because of low quality isn't really a way to make friends here. I would suggest you look for good quality images and nominate them for quality image or valued image and maybe if the image is really outstanding, for featured picture. That's more fun for everyone involved and files using these quality badges end up much higher in the search rankings because the search engine is configured to give these a boost. Multichill (talk) 19:10, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

The deletion policy says "Files that add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject, especially if they are of poor or mediocre quality." and in my opinion such media hinder searching for the right/representative ones. But well, I might try it the other way from time to time. --Nefronus (talk) 20:32, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

Fragaria vesca

Dear colleague, do not bother to clarify, why did I attract such close attention from you? Or are you outraged by the presence of strawberries (Zemlyanika/Wald-Erdbeere - Fragaria vesca) and strawberries (Klubnika/Hügel-Erdbeere - Fragaria viridis) [1][2][3]? Ural-66 (talk) 20:23, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

• Dear colleague, I'll gladly bother. Once I was searching for a photo of a wild strawberry and found one that looked good as a thumbnail, but when I opened the full-sized version, the strawberry itself was completely blurred (it was not a photo of yours). I nominated it from deletion (deletion policy: "Files that add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject, especially if they are of poor or mediocre quality.") and the admins accepted that nomination. I thought that presence of such images just makes searching for a certain one harder, and I thought deleting such an image just makes the category more organized/accessible. In this conviction, I continued looking around the category. Let’s admit that especially the first image is very blurred and hardly useful for anyone searching for a strawberry flower. After this, I learned that the admins don't like this approach and now I see it leads to disputes among users – so I apologize. I'm already focusing on things other than deletion nominations. --Nefronus (talk) 22:21, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Well, for the quality, excuse me for what we have. There are no professional photographers on Wikipedia, and besides, biologists. As for the photos you indicated, they are not only about flowers, but about plants in general. for example: thirdly, the leaves and their distinctive properties are clearly visible, as well as the soil (soil surface) in which they grow. Secondly, the variation of the flower and the plant itself is clearly visible depending on the growing conditions (dense soil in the sun (on the side of the forest road)). Well, in the first photo - a general view of growing plants, growth conditions, density of growth, surrounding vegetation, etc. Well, in Russia, not only wild strawberries [Zemlyanika] (Fragaria vesca), but also strawberries [Klubnika] (Fragaria viridis) grow in the wild. And in stores they sell cultivated strawberries [Zemlyanika] (Fragaria × ananassa), also called strawberries [Klubnika], incorrectly. Ural-66 (talk) 15:13, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Earth schematics

Hello Nefronus,

Thanks for your interest in these schematics. Glad to hear it helps :)

I saw you localized in Czech. Good job ! Feel free to ask for some design if you need. If I could help, I'll do it.

Bibar (talk) 17:03, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fraxinus excelsior infructescence.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 18:32, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Corylus avellana male and female flowers 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 19:44, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tussilago farfara TK 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Wilfredor 19:50, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pulmonaria officinalis TK.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Wilfredor 19:50, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chlamydomonas reinhardtii vector scheme.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 18:46, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leucojum vernum TK 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:23, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 29 March 2021 (UTC)