User talk:PeeJay
 First steps tutorialOur first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy.  Getting helpMore information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel irc:wikimedia-commons #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
 Goodies, tips and tricks
 Made a mistake?
| |
| (P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) | ||
Kimse (talk) 23:31, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
![23 [Request] File:SWE-POR 2015-06-30.svg](#[Request]_File:SWE-POR_2015-06-30.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Tip: Categorizing images[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
- [[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
- [[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
- [[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 06:14, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Kit left arm nike pinstripe redblue.png is uncategorized since 21 January 2009. BotMultichillT 06:14, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Kit body manutda0507.png is uncategorized since 21 January 2009. BotMultichillT 06:14, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Man Utd vs Palmeiras 1999-11-30.svg is uncategorized since 11 March 2009. BotMultichillT 06:17, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Rydal Penrhos Pavilion.jpg was uncategorized on 19 August 2009.
- Image:Cruz Azul vs Atlante 2009-04-22.svg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
File:Barcelona vs Man Utd 2009-05-27.svg[edit]
Ich habe gesehen das du Fußballstartaufstellung erstellt hast. Kannst du mir sagen wie man das erstellt und wo ich für ein Fußballspiel die Startaufstellung herbekomme? Das wäre nett. --Auto1234 (talk) 03:01, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Kit_body_manutd0910a.png[edit]
I think you want to delete the wrong file File: Kit_body_manutd0910a.png because I created this symbol of nike (not an illegal copy of the original image) and if you put in the category en:Template:Football kit was because you wanted to, I have nothing from that, is another thing, the shirt was launched yesterday and you have created (or invented) this file before the official release. Find fashion is also illegal, so it is not fair you delete 
because I am the author of this file.
--Bruno-ban (talk) 11:32, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
File:ARG-NED 1978-06-25.svg[edit]
Hi, the formation is slightly wrong Gallego is the 5 (middle) and Ardiles the 8 (right midfielder) --Jor70 (talk) 23:24, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
File:KOR-GRE 2010-06-12.svg[edit]
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 00:37, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi. I saw your work for the two matches of Greece in the Group B of the world cup. In both of them, the player's positions on the pitch have been inaccurate. I have corrected the positions in the text, but I cannot do it in the pictures! If possible, pls create new pictures with the right positions. Thanks a lot!!! Panagiotis Botsis (talk) 12:27, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi friend ;)[edit]
Hello friend, I saw your drawings compositions World Cup I wanted to know how do you do that too;) me I worked for the french wikipedia for a while now I deal with the Portuguese wikipedia and j Would have liked to know how it is;) to make compositions like these to thank you:) for all;) friend;))
(Biling 16:41, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
File:ITA-PAR 2010-06-14.svg[edit]
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 15:19, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
File: NED-DEN 2010-06-14.svg[edit]
Hey. The danish formation is wrong on this image: it should be 4-3-3. Midfield: Jorgensen-C.Poulsen-Kahlenberg, Attack: Enevoldsen (left)-Bendtner (middle)-Rommedahl (right). So I would ask you to please correct this. If you think that I'm wrong, please do nothing, say nothing: I won't argue. I'm a danish fan, I saw the match, I know that I'm right.
File:Kit socks Feyenoord.png[edit]
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 13:36, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
Adidas copyright[edit]
I'm not using the official Adidas logo, it's no image. So no copyright infringement! It resembles the official logo, but it is not the real thing, so again no copyright infringement. Please stop changing the RSC Anderlecht home kit.
Again, adidas copyright[edit]
Trying to be smart is not funny, but you should know. You said it yourself: it looks like the Adidas logo. "Looking the same" is not the same as BEING the same. It is suppost to resemble the logo, without violating copyrights. If I wanted to violate copyrights, why didn't use the real logo? So stop being smart and ruining somebody's work. Ofcourse it looks like the Adidas logo! What did you think? That I was going to make one that resembles the logo of Nike??? There are various kits on Wikimedia with exact the same "Adidas logo" and nobody, Wikimedia inclusive, ever complained about it. So don't try to be smarter than everbody else or I'll have to report your behaviour.
2011 Copa Libertadores final[edit]
I dont know how to make line-ups svg images (File:Man City vs Stoke 2011-05-14.svg for example), and was wondering if you could do the line-ups of the two games of the 2011 Copa Libertadores final, using official data as source:
Peñarol vs Santos - here
Santos vs Peñarol - here
(Take notice that the line up is under the "Táctica" subheading)
Thanks a million in advance. Cheers.-Nuno93 (talk) 04:11, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
Line Up shirts[edit]
Hey!
I've seen that you've uploaded alot of Uefa Euro 2012 line ups. My question is, where do you got the shirts from? I'm currently trying to make some line ups for some articles at the Swedish Wikipedia thats not here at the Media but can't find any good shirts to use...
Cheers, Hastaro (talk) 17:07, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
File:GRE-RUS_2012-06-16.svg[edit]
Hi! Sifakis was the greek goalkeeper, please correct it. --Tomcsy (talk) 00:48, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
Kits[edit]
Stops to remove the logos. They are allowed.--Principal adjoint (talk) 11:02, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- You have been accused of plagiarism by a sports brands?--Principal adjoint (talk) 11:31, 3 August 2012 (UTC)--Principal adjoint (talk) 11:31, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- What I find strange, watching your contributions that you have resisted this rat Bruno-ban for 2 years at least. What is your secret for puissse I do the same?--Principal adjoint (talk) 11:37, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
File:Chelsa vs Man City 2012-08-12.svg[edit]
I see you have previously made team formations judging by your talk page and this file. Could you please make a file for this year's Community Shield between Chelsea and Manchester City. Much appreciated! --Ricky Sen (talk) 14:21, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Final warning for edit warring in football kit images[edit]
Hello there.
This is a final warning to all editors involved in the upload war over football kits. Pages like File:Kit body rmcf1213a.png, with over a dozen back and forth uploads, are disruptive.I have seen this same type of edit war on several pages, and going back several months. It does not matter if you think you're right or not, it has to end. If you are on the side advocating for logos, and the image has no logos, upload the version with logos as a separate image, and add the version with no logos to the other versions section of the file description page. The same goes for if you are on the side advocating for no logos and the current version has logos already. It is better to have two stable versions than to have one very unstable one.
Also, since at least one party has already started this, I am explicity forbidding you from putting each other's versions up for deletion at DR. This is an extension of the edit warring, and is, like the edit warring, highly disruptive.
Because of the length and severity of this mess, the minimum block length I would consider for continued violations after a final warning is one month. Repeated infractions will quickly scale up in block length. I do not consider myself too involved to take admin action here. It has to end, and repeated pleas for you all to talk it out have fallen on deaf ears.
Sven Manguard Wha? 16:24, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Hey there[edit]
I've seen all those football lineups images you've made. I just want to ask how you make it. I'd really appreciate it if you'd help me. THANKS User:Flameguy714 User talk:Flameguy714
Notification about possible deletion[edit]
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Raoli ✉ (talk) 19:43, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion[edit]
|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 17:47, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
Starting lines-up shirts[edit]
Trying on Wikicommons I found your picture: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8d/Milan_vs_Liverpool_2005-05-25.svg. I found the image of the empty football field : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:493px-Soccer_field_-_empty.png and now I want to find the teams's shirts in order to create new lines-up. Do you know by any chance where I can find the template?
Notification about possible deletion[edit]
|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, LGA talkedits 11:10, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
[Request] File:SWE-POR 2015-06-30.svg[edit]
Hi, I see that you often do great works with football lineups.
Would it be a problem for you to create a lineup of the last 2015 European Under-21 final?
If it's easier for you, I already have the informations about that:
Sweden (home team) printscreen: http://s17.postimg.org/ixsnehc0f/swe.png
Portugal (away team) printscreen: http://s17.postimg.org/f594yqwi7/por.png
If you don't have time or it's boring it doesn't matter, thanks anyway! --SoccerFan1987 (talk) 22:17, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
- Wow, thank you so much for the great work!
Could you replace Neuer with Carlgren? Apart that, it's perfect!!! Thanks again --SoccerFan1987 (talk) 11:25, 5 July 2015 (UTC)- Very very nice, thanks a lot! --SoccerFan1987 (talk) 21:43, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
An unfree Flickr license has been found on File:Old Trafford 2 (2003 UEFA Champions League Final).jpg[edit]
), No derivative works (
), or All Rights Reserved (
), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. Unless the Flickr user changes the license to one that Wikimedia Commons accepts, the file will be speedily deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as 
(CC BY), 
(CC BY-SA) or 
(CC0) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. Once the license on Flickr is changed, you may replace the {{Unfree Flickr file}} tag with {{Flickrreview}} so that an administrator or reviewer can review the image again.Ww2censor (talk) 15:51, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
RWC[edit]
Hi, you called my remake of rugby lineups 'really ugly' so I decided to find out what's going on. I put quite a lot of effort and spend a bit of time to make it look better than those you made recently, for exaple this one File:New Zealand vs Japan 2011-09-16.svg. I drew kits that aren't just one-colour filled templates, aligned the lines and spacing between the players. I adjusted scrum position that tighthead prop looks like a tighthead one. By moving flankers a bit back I got this kind of effect (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CPG9THeWcAABaHb.png) as well as more place for locks' and flankers' surnames like Ratuniyarawa or Tchilaishvili. The only thing I'm not 100% convinced is the fact that names are bolded but I thought there is enough space for it. What made you revert my changes? I have no desire for edit warring but I sincirely think my version is more precise. Please let me know what you think. ARvєδuι + 22:01, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
- Changing the font or its bolding isn't a big problem, I assume. And about lineups from past games – who says they need to be changed? Everything evolve from worse to better and they still are not all the same (1 → 2 → 3). Main thing is to be consistent within one tournament. ARvєδuι + 06:48, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
- First of all, shouldn’t the home team be on the top? And more your main accusation was bolding the font, but afterwards you reverted all my changes with one exception: flankers position. Do you waste my time on purpose or just accidentaly? All I've done, adding those kits, organizing lineups. I made this template for some reason, to use it, not to ignore it. I wrote you a message, you overwrote my edits. Good job! ARvєδuι + 16:33, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
- Have you at least opened this file: File:2015 RWC blank lineup.svg. Not in browser, in Inkscype or any other program you use. What I made you can read few lines above, as I already wrote that. I was thinking about this font. If you use Verdana (18 pt), bold one isn't readable, standard one isn't great as well. I changed it to Arial 19 (bolded). Maybe this one will fit you better. (http://imgur.com/gRwuLcn) ARvєδuι + 18:10, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, I've opened your blank template, but the only difference I can really see is that you've changed the font. The detailed kits clearly took you a long time, but I think that level of detail is unnecessary; who's going to be looking that closely at the colours? For kits, we should be adding {{Football kit}} to the match summaries, the graphic is just to show the line-ups in a graphical format, hence only the basic colours are required. PeeJay2K3 (talk) 11:28, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
- Have you at least opened this file: File:2015 RWC blank lineup.svg. Not in browser, in Inkscype or any other program you use. What I made you can read few lines above, as I already wrote that. I was thinking about this font. If you use Verdana (18 pt), bold one isn't readable, standard one isn't great as well. I changed it to Arial 19 (bolded). Maybe this one will fit you better. (http://imgur.com/gRwuLcn) ARvєδuι + 18:10, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
- First of all, shouldn’t the home team be on the top? And more your main accusation was bolding the font, but afterwards you reverted all my changes with one exception: flankers position. Do you waste my time on purpose or just accidentaly? All I've done, adding those kits, organizing lineups. I made this template for some reason, to use it, not to ignore it. I wrote you a message, you overwrote my edits. Good job! ARvєδuι + 16:33, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Wrong initials[edit]
I see you have illustrated two different rugby world cup line ups the have the wrong initials. The Wales vs Uruguay, Uruguay's number eight position surname is incorrect. The New Zealand vs Namibia, New Zealand's blindside flanker postilon surname is incorrect.
Many thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smashem (talk • contribs)
What's the program to edit/illustrate lineups like you've been creating?
Sorry, again just thought I'd inform you that one of the lineups surname is incorrect. Samoa vs South Africa, Samoa's prop position should be Johnston not Perenise.
Thanks and I apologize
Just little tweaks to be fixed that you've probably already noticed. Scotland, Uruguay, USA and Romania have wrong color kits on in the lineups you created.
thanks Smashem (talk) 19:57, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
Wrong initials[edit]
Haha spotted another mistake in the Australia vs Uruguay line up you created. Both flankers positions are incorrect. Should be McCalman not Fardy and McMahon not Hooper. Sorry if this bothers you. I would do this myself to save you the trouble but I don't know how. Plus I noticed the color of the Uruguay's shirts are different to how you had them on the previous line up you created involving them.
Thanks Smashem (talk) 21:38, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
Little tweak. Should be Veainu not Vainikolo. 122.57.12.133 09:44, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
File:Tonga vs Namibia 2015-09-29.svg[edit]
Left wings surname is incorrect
Kind regards Rugbytaranaki (talk) 08:30, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
File:South Africa vs United States 2015-10-07.svg[edit]
South Africa's kit is the wrong color.
Kind regards Rugbytaranaki (talk) 18:47, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
File:Canada vs Romania 2015-10-06.svg[edit]
Romania's kit is the wrong color.
Kind regards Rugbytaranaki (talk) 18:49, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
File:South Africa vs United States 2015-10-07.svg[edit]
Inside centres surname is incorrect.
Kind regards Rugbytaranaki (talk) 03:43, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
File:2008 0521 Moscow 26.jpg[edit]
|
|
File:2008 0521 Moscow 26.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
A.Savin 12:36, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Johnoshea.jpg[edit]
|
|
| This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Johnoshea.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, JuTa 22:14, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
Tagging copyvios[edit]
Hi, When tagging copyright violations, please inform the uploader. This is best done using the gagdet. See in your preferences to enable them, tab "Gadget", section "Maintenance tools" : "AjaxQuickDelete" and "Quick delete". These add links in the left column (or right column for Hebrew, Arabic, etc., language interface). Regards, Yann (talk) 23:20, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
File:Alessandro Zanni 2017.jpg[edit]
|
|
File:Alessandro Zanni 2017.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:20, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
File:Marcello Violi 2017.jpg[edit]
|
|
File:Marcello Violi 2017.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:20, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
File:Tito Tebaldi 2017.jpg[edit]
|
|
File:Tito Tebaldi 2017.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:21, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
File:Braam Steyn 2017.jpg[edit]
|
|
File:Braam Steyn 2017.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:21, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
File:Federico Ruzza 2017.jpg[edit]
|
|
File:Federico Ruzza 2017.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:22, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
File:Leonardo Sarto 2017.jpg[edit]
|
|
File:Leonardo Sarto 2017.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:22, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
File:Nicola Quaglio 2017.jpg[edit]
|
|
File:Nicola Quaglio 2017.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:22, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
File:Tiziano Pasquali 2017.jpg[edit]
|
|
File:Tiziano Pasquali 2017.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:23, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
File:Sergio Parisse 2017.jpg[edit]
|
|
File:Sergio Parisse 2017.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:23, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
File:Jack Polledri 2017.jpg[edit]
|
|
File:Jack Polledri 2017.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:24, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
File:Ian McKinley 2017.jpg[edit]
|
|
File:Ian McKinley 2017.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:24, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
File:Sebastian Negri 2017.jpg[edit]
|
|
File:Sebastian Negri 2017.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:24, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
File:Edoardo Padovani 2017.jpg[edit]
|
|
File:Edoardo Padovani 2017.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:25, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
File:Matteo Minozzi 2017.jpg[edit]
|
|
File:Matteo Minozzi 2017.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:25, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
File:Andrea Lovotti 2017.jpg[edit]
|
|
File:Andrea Lovotti 2017.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:25, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
File:Maxime Mbanda 2017.jpg[edit]
|
|
File:Maxime Mbanda 2017.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:26, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
File:Giovanni Licata 2017.jpg[edit]
|
|
File:Giovanni Licata 2017.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:26, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
File:Renato Giammarioli 2017.jpg[edit]
|
|
File:Renato Giammarioli 2017.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:27, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
File:Jayden Hayward 2017.jpg[edit]
|
|
File:Jayden Hayward 2017.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:27, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
File:Edoardo Gori 2017.jpg[edit]
|
|
File:Edoardo Gori 2017.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:27, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
File:Simone Ferrari 2017.jpg[edit]
|
|
File:Simone Ferrari 2017.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:28, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
File:Marco Fuser 2017.jpg[edit]
|
|
File:Marco Fuser 2017.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:28, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
File:Leonardo Ghiraldini 2017.jpg[edit]
|
|
File:Leonardo Ghiraldini 2017.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:28, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
File:Tommaso Castello 2017.jpg[edit]
|
|
File:Tommaso Castello 2017.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:29, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
File:Oliviero Fabiani 2017.jpg[edit]
|
|
File:Oliviero Fabiani 2017.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:29, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
File:Carlo Canna 2017.jpg[edit]
|
|
File:Carlo Canna 2017.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:29, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
File:Tommaso Boni 2017.jpg[edit]
|
|
File:Tommaso Boni 2017.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:30, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
File:Luca Bigi 2017.jpg[edit]
|
|
File:Luca Bigi 2017.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:30, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
File:Dean Budd 2017.jpg[edit]
|
|
File:Dean Budd 2017.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:30, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
File:Mattia Bellini 2017.jpg[edit]
|
|
File:Mattia Bellini 2017.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:31, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
File:Tommaso Benvenuti 2017.jpg[edit]
|
|
File:Tommaso Benvenuti 2017.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:31, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
File:George Biagi 2017.jpg[edit]
|
|
File:George Biagi 2017.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:32, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
Italian rugby photos[edit]
Hi. If Daniele Resini has sent an anthorization to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org everything is fine and the pictures won't be deleted. King regards, Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:35, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
Thank you[edit]
Thank you for designing (making) all the graphic Team line-outs e.g. Bayern Munich vs Chelsea 2012-05-19. Great idea. They really "Add to the articles quality". Thanks again for all your hard work and input.
Lineup[edit]
Hi PJ,
I was wondering how you made lineups such as the following file:File:Chelsea vs Man Utd 2018-05-19.svg
Thanks
Uebelhoer (talk) 13:05, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
Request[edit]
Please read Commons:Assume good faith before doing things like what you've done in the previous hour. Thanks. – Flix11 (talk) 08:14, 11 June 2019 (UTC)