User talk:Von.grzanka

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Von.grzanka!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel irc:wikimedia-commons #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], which produces: Image:Foo.jpg If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|correct name}} For more information read the full deletion guidelines.
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Von.grzanka!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:24, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

• Image:Rzeżucha łąkowa vongrzanka.jpg is uncategorized since 13 April 2009.
• Image:Gloria Artis Vongrzanka edit.jpg was uncategorized on 9 September 2009.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mniszek lekarski vongrzanka.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good light and details --Ianare 17:22, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kozłówka pałac vongrzanka.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sky is dull, sharpness could be better, but IMHO good enough. --Afrank99 08:24, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

DOF = Depth of Field, the area of relative sharpness that you can control by your aperture. The smaller the aperture (greater number), the greater DOF. At fully opened aperture it's usually very thin, but the lens length also factors in here - wide angle lenses have greater DOF in relation to aperture, telephoto and macro lenses have small relative DOF. Also varies with distance to subject.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Szablak krwisty vongrzanka 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Correct, for me. --ComputerHotline 06:24, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Szablak krwisty vongrzanka.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Correct, for me. --ComputerHotline 06:24, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pieczarka polowa vongrzanka.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could have used a bit more DOF but visually striking, works for me. --Vladanr 14:56, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torfowisko moszne vongrzanka.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --Pudelek 14:36, 17 October 2009 (UTC)  QuestionCan you geocode please? --99of9 09:50, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Felis catus-cat on snow.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice photo --George Chernilevsky 17:12, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Portrait

Re: «blury, could use more DOF». Could you please look at the other two so to find out, are they any better? Thanks. (Pity to say I couldn't use more DOF, it was too dark in there.)--PereslavlFoto (talk) 16:45, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Felis catus-cat on snow.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Felis catus-cat on snow.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 08:01, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Xanthoria parietina on eternit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --George Chernilevsky 07:55, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wieprz river in March.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good spot.Number of striched photos in description maybe. --PetarM 18:55, 7 March 2010 (UTC)  Comment Done. Thank you for your concern. --Von.grzanka 19:06, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wieprz river in March 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Ikar.us 09:38, 11 March 2010 (UTC)  Comment Blown sky should be noted. IMHO the right fifth of the pano could be cropped. --Iotatau 09:16, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Xanthoria parietina on elm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

TUSC token bf02a8b99adaf3e1c0a1b09d9f017a92

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hepatica nobilis on leaves.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good work--Kuvaly 10:52, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cepaea nemoralis on moss 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments the grass mask the subject --Croucrou 17:44, 11 April 2010 (UTC) Comment It's not grass but stalks supporting the capsules of mosses. :) I think that's the point of this picture; showing this beautiful snail in its natural habitat. But I'm not complaining though. If you really think this picture doesn't deserve QI status, be free to decline this nomination. :]. Agree with unsigned comment above, disagree with Croucrou. QI for me--Jebulon 20:31, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cepaea nemoralis on moss edited.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dead wood mouse eaten by ants.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments metal \m/_(^-^)_\m/ --Ianare 03:35, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View from Yağdonduran Pass.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments great view and well done stitching --J. Lunau 10:35, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Misumena vatia with caught fly.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice one!-Letartean 21:26, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Campanula patula - Bialowieza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice. --Cayambe 13:50, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Feral pigeon.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 10:19, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feral pigeon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Equisetum arvense strobilus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful (damage to F5, F10 would have been better)--Archaeodontosaurus 08:02, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hyla arborea dark.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments For me a QI--Holleday 17:41, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oxalis acetosella cluster.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice--Holleday 17:36, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hyla arborea on reed.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Ximonic 20:23, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

2013!

		* * * 2013 !!! * * *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Yours faithfully, George -- George Chernilevsky talk 22:43, 24 December 2012 (UTC)