User talk:D4m1en

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, D4m1en!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | অসমীয়া | asturianu | azərbaycanca | تۆرکجه | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | भोजपुरी | Bahasa Banjar | বাংলা | català | нохчийн | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | euskara | estremeñu | فارسی | suomi | français | Frysk | galego | עברית | हिन्दी | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | norsk | occitan | Ирон | polski | português | português do Brasil | rumantsch | română | русский | sicilianu | Scots | سنڌي | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | සිංහල | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | Basa Sunda | svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Tagalog | Türkçe | українська | اردو | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 粵語 | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Underground Parking Nantes Fisheye.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Underground Parking Nantes Fisheye.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Very interesting perspective. ZooFari 18:02, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Smart Roadster Coupe 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Smart Roadster Coupe 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good to me, perhaps the crop a bit tight (only tight at top?, I'm not sure) --Lmbuga 00:18, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Smart Roadster Coupe 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Smart Roadster Coupe 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cayambe 06:37, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Set Promotion[edit]

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Smart Roadster Coupé.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Smart Roadster Coupé.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--MrPanyGoff 07:51, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

QI Candidates[edit]

Good morning. I wanted to thank you for your comments on my pictures quality candidates. I've tried to correct some errors

I would greatly appreciate your comments, thanks--The Photographer (talk) 15:41, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Matthias Church Budapest Corrected.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Matthias Church Budapest Corrected.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Sky is a bit noisy but QI for me. (Could you reduce that noise a bit anyway please?) --Kadellar 18:02, 17 September 2012 (UTC<BR\>✓ Done Thank you for the review. Selective denoising of sky applied. D4m1en 20:49, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
Thanks!! --Kadellar 11:44, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
Matthias Church Budapest Roof Tiles.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Matthias Church Budapest Roof Tiles.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:38, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
Matthias Church Budapest Altar.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Matthias Church Budapest Altar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
OK for me. --JLPC 17:22, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Vachette Radial NT key.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vachette Radial NT key.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
The „halo shadow“ looks unnatural, and there’s some CA on the right edge. However, it’s definitely good enough for QI :-) --Kreuzschnabel 16:17, 23 December 2012 (UTC) ✓ Done Thank you for the review. New version with CA removed and contour improved. D4m1en 09:11, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open[edit]

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 10:50, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement[edit]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2012 Picture of the Year contest.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Keso 2000 key.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Keso 2000 key.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. However, please clone out the few very dark dirt spots around the key. Some disturbances of a grey background paper are always normal, but deep dark dirts are to be avoided. --Cccefalon 16:07, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
✓ Done thank you for the review. D4m1en 16:42, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Digipass 270 HSBC.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Digipass 270 HSBC.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Overall good quality but please apply perspective correction --Cccefalon 18:31, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
✓ Done also I made the background solid white (Photoshop curves are neat once you get the hang of it) D4m1en 21:38, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
Good quality. --Cccefalon 14:28, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
Digicode.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Digicode.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
It's slightly tilted ccw, but can be QI after correction. I also proposed a tighter crop to get rid of the darker area at the bottom --Cccefalon 18:25, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
✓ Done Rotated 0.3 deg CW. Actually the object isn't really a rectangle, it's a bit crooked... Also while I had Photoshop running I cloned out some small imperfections on the object's face. Thank you for your advice ! D4m1en 21:38, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
Good quality. Yes it was only a minimal tilt, but because of the linear brush of the metal it was immediately evident. Now it's good. --Cccefalon 14:28, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Kobo by FNAC White bg.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kobo by FNAC White bg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Copyvio I think: See the page of FNAC, in spanish page: FNAC es una marca registrada explotada en España bajo licencia de FNAC S.A. © Copyright © 2000-2014 Fnac.es. Todos los derechos reservados.--Lmbuga 04:19, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment In the french page: "© Fnac 2014".

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Bad crop? (see note)--Lmbuga 04:25, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Regarding the bad crop, that's just the power switch on the top of the device. For the logo copyright, I didn't think it was a problem. The logo is just letters and a square so it doesn't look copyrightable to me, but I've asked for advice on Commons:Village_pump/Copyright D4m1en 10:12, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment According toyann the Fnac logo is covered by {{PD-textlogo}} so no copyright problem here. D4m1en 14:47, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Ok, no problem with the logo, sorry--Lmbuga 07:59, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support I understand, QI for me, but a bit noisy to a photo of studio--Lmbuga 08:04, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

File:Kobo by FNAC White bg.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Kobo by FNAC White bg.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 18:23, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Chateau de Thoiry.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chateau de Thoiry.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:06, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Niverolle alpine (Montifringilla nivalis) - les Arcs 2018 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Niverolle alpine (Montifringilla nivalis) - les Arcs 2018 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Nice, high-quality picture, but I'm not seeing geographic coordinates. Could you add them? -- Ikan Kekek 02:02, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
Dammit I totally forgot about coordinates, it is now ✓ Done -- D4m1en 19:17, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
Great. Symbol support vote.svg Support. -- Ikan Kekek 06:59, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Yann (talk) 13:28, 23 April 2018 (UTC)