User talk:Trace
Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
badname[edit]
Hi, the {{Badname}} is for duplicate files which are uploaded by the author. If a Imagename is missleading please use the templage {{Rename}} instead ({{rename|bettername.jpg}}). Thanks and greetings, --Martin H. (talk) 17:18, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
- The concerned images: Image:LoumaOperatorPaleo.JPG, Image:LoumaPaleo02.JPG, Image:LoumaPaleo01.JPG, Image:LoumaPaleo03.JPG. --Martin H. (talk) 17:20, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
- [[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
- [[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
- [[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT (talk) 06:16, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Base nautique de Vaires sur Marne.jpg is uncategorized since 7 January 2009. BotMultichillT (talk) 06:16, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Étiquette Comtes de Champagne 1966.jpg was uncategorized on 12 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:32, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Contre-étiquette Comtes de Champagne 1966.jpg was uncategorized on 12 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:32, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chalets et domes de Miage.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. As I am absolutely unable to understand how Hugin works, I'm admirative. With the mountains, I like the walking tourists, and the little stream too.--Jebulon 21:27, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! SNCF TGV PSE Viaduc de Cize - Bolozon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Très belle image, et le moment est parfaitement choisi! Quelques artefacts dans l'eau au 1er plan, si on veut chipoter...--Vassil 13:20, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
|
Are you who write in my words? [edit]
(poor english)
Are you who write in my words?
- Español: Eres tú el que decidió votar en mi lugar al leer mis palabras en Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list? Te agradecería que me respondieses--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 22:46, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
Sorry, I think that you're not, but I can't find who do it.--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 23:00, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry, it was User:Iifar, see this--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 23:34, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! IAO-Hanle-high energy gamma ray telescope-UnderRainbow.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Support --Iifar 19:16, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Scopus umbretta -Kruger National Park, South Africa-8a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality.--ArildV 06:43, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Panorama Bled 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality.--ArildV 06:36, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Arran's northern hills from Ardrossan ferry.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality.--ArildV 06:36, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 20130330 - Vendée Volley-Ball Club Herbretais - Foyer Laïque Saint-Quentin Volley-Ball - 105.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. Very nice --Smial 10:27, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Réfectoire de l'abbaye Saint-Jean des Vignes.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Good quality. no white, no black - good work --Ralf Roletschek 11:12, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
|
Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement[edit]
Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]
- ⧼Wikibase-terms/Trace⧽: العربية, български, Deutsch, English, français, italiano, македонски, മലയാളം, 日本語, русский, svenska, اردو, 中文
Dear Wikimedians,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 1 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2012 Picture of the Year contest.
Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]
- ⧼Wikibase-terms/Trace⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, français, magyar, italiano, македонски, 日本語, русский, svenska
Dear Wikimedians,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 2 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.
This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:21, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]
Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]
- In other languages: Deutsch, español, français, 日本語, Nederlands, русский, svenska, Türkçe, українська
Dear Trace,
The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).
- In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
- In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)
We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:
- 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
- In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
- In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.
Click here to view the top images »
We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.
Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:58, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Sonic Protest-10042014.png[edit]
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Sonic Protest-10042014.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, JuTa 17:26, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
- email sent today to : com dot sonicprotest chez gmail punkt com, asking for authorization. Trace (talk) 14:29, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
your deletion requests[edit]
Hi Trace, there is a problem with your 3 SD-requests. These images had been published by you 7 years ago and up-to-now all re-users had been requested to credit you under the given name. Which name shall re-users credit now? As all of them are currently in use on-wiki, simply deleting the file would break all these links. However, I can rev-del the original log-entries and thereby remove the name. But I would ask you to send an email to OTRS stating that these 3 files until today were requested to be credited to <unwantedname>, which was change today to <newname>. --Túrelio (talk) 06:30, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
- @Túrelio: thank you for your reply. I would like those files to be credited to "Trace", that's all.
- Excuse me to ask, but who shall I send the email to ? Is there a peculiar OTRS email address that deals with that kind of problems ?
- All the best, Trace (talk) 21:39, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
Please check whether that is enough for you: File:AiguilleCrochedepuislesommetduVeleray.jpg and File:AiguilleCroche.jpg. For File:DomesdeMiage.png, you first need to upload a "new" version over the existing one (might be exactly the same file) just to create a new uploal-log without the real name. --Túrelio (talk) 06:57, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
- @Túrelio: perfect ! Thanks a lot ! It is exactly what I wanted. I re-uploaded the file File:DomesdeMiage.png. Shall I also write to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org ? Thank you for taking care of such a minor problem that only concerns me and not the community. Trace (talk) 07:26, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
- @Túrelio: I notice you also did it for the last file. I really appreciate. Thank you. Trace (talk) 19:03, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, to your question. I just want to be sure that when you and I may long have gone from Commons, a re-user who had used the old credit will not get into trouble. OTRS is the best way to have a safe, but (sort of) confidential record. --Túrelio (talk) 20:16, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
- @Túrelio: now I understand ! I'll write to OTRS. Thank you. Trace (talk) 20:42, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
- @Túrelio: I notice you also did it for the last file. I really appreciate. Thank you. Trace (talk) 19:03, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
- @Túrelio: perfect ! Thanks a lot ! It is exactly what I wanted. I re-uploaded the file File:DomesdeMiage.png. Shall I also write to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org ? Thank you for taking care of such a minor problem that only concerns me and not the community. Trace (talk) 07:26, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
File:A14V1000BASC.jpg[edit]
File:A14V1000BASC.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.
The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 15:07, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Clarinet-horiz.png[edit]
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Clarinet-horiz.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:59, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open![edit]
You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.
Dear Trace,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 2 will end on 28 May 2016, 23:59:59 UTC.
Thanks,
-- Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 09:44, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Themightyquill (talk) 18:50, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2018 is open![edit]
Dear Trace,
You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in R1 of the 2018 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2018) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked.
In the final (and current) round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2018.
Round 2 will end 17 March 2019, 23:59:59.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 18:05, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
Autopatrol given[edit]
Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. ~riley (talk) 04:47, 25 March 2020 (UTC)